SalarySwishSalarySwish

Love for Laine

Created by: yikes
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 1, 2022
Published: Jul. 2, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Just for fun
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
3$2,150,500
8$4,000,000
2$1,250,500
3$2,250,500
8$8,500,500
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2023 5th round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
PLACEHOLDER TEAM
2.
SJS
  1. Laine, Patrik [RFA Rights]
CBJ
  1. Coe, Brandon
  2. Dahlén, Jonathan
  3. Hill, Adin
  4. Labanc, Kevin
  5. 2022 1st round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
*assuming the Jackets flip Korpi to one of the desperate teams for a decent return, Hill is included here, could swap out for a prospect*
3.
SJS
  1. Dellandrea, Ty
  2. Hakanpää, Jani
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (DAL)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent ($2,000,000 retained)
4.
SJS
  1. 2022 4th round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
PLACEHOLDER TEAM
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$82,500,000$71,602,333$0$1,145,000$10,897,667
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
$8,500,500$8,500,500
C, RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,500$1,250,500
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$848,333$848,333 (Performance Bonus$60,000$60K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,500$2,250,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 2, 2022 at 4:49 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 409
Likes: 407
I don't see CBJ being interested in any of those pieces for Laine. If the deal doesn't include Hertl, Meier or Eklund+ there's not much of a deal to be made. He's a cornerstone of the team and CBJ would need a similar player back.

This chart should explain why:
https://www.eliteprospects.com/league/nhl/stats/all-time?min-age=18&max-age=23&sort=g&from=2000-2001
dk325, Viqsi and Friendly_Cannon liked this.
Jul. 2, 2022 at 4:54 p.m.
#2
Temple of Ferraro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 638
Likes: 336
Not enough for Laine imo + CBJ is on the upswing and would probably look to add rather than sell
Viqsi, Friendly_Cannon and dk325 liked this.
Jul. 2, 2022 at 5:01 p.m.
#3
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,749
Likes: 3,231
A general rule of thumb is that if you go beyond a 3:1 ratio in terms of assets exchanged in a trade, you're ripping off the team with the 1 and you need to be replacing existing assets with higher quality ones, not trying to throw in more and hoping that makes it work.
dk325 and Civil_Eng_PE liked this.
Jul. 2, 2022 at 5:39 p.m.
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,093
Likes: 12,835
Quoting: Viqsi
A general rule of thumb is that if you go beyond a 3:1 ratio in terms of assets exchanged in a trade, you're ripping off the team with the 1 and you need to be replacing existing assets with higher quality ones, not trying to throw in more and hoping that makes it work.


Get the point just starting a conversation. (Don’t think that ratio always is applicable tho, but again I get it)

Starting with Dahlen, Labanc, 11 wasn’t tryna to throw crap.
Roster player (like Eichel trade, Labanc), 11th OA, quality young player Dahlen, and Coe who I personally have high hopes for, and I would rather keep in if I’m CBJ.

As mentioned below in my other reply, definitely would entertain throwing guys like Gushchin and such into the mix. And if we take out Hill that only puts up more prospects if that’s up your alley.

Quoting: pocke
I don't see CBJ being interested in any of those pieces for Laine. If the deal doesn't include Hertl, Meier or Eklund+ there's not much of a deal to be made. He's a cornerstone of the team and CBJ would need a similar player back.

This chart should explain why:
https://www.eliteprospects.com/league/nhl/stats/all-time?min-age=18&max-age=23&sort=g&from=2000-2001

Completely fair.
I dont think SJS would part with any pieces except for a Meier Laine swap but Meiers play last year definitely puts the favour in SJ as both players had their personal years of struggle but I would say recency bias would factor in based on Meiers overall dominance.

Id be willing to part with better prospects than Coe (but I don’t think Coe is a low quality prospect just FYI, higher on him than Ozzy) and maybe go Gushchin/ Ozzy/ Merkley (Ryan) but I don’t think SJ would entertain moving Eklund, Bordeleau.
Quoting: Bias_it_self
Not enough for Laine imo + CBJ is on the upswing and would probably look to add rather than sell


Oh yeah - just food for thought if Laine was willing/ wanting to move and CBJ wanted to load up for a deep run by 2024-26.
Jul. 2, 2022 at 6:01 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 409
Likes: 407
Quoting: yikes
Get the point just starting a conversation. (Don’t think that ratio always is applicable tho, but again I get it)

Starting with Dahlen, Labanc, 11 wasn’t tryna to throw crap.
Roster player (like Eichel trade, Labanc), 11th OA, quality young player Dahlen, and Coe who I personally have high hopes for, and I would rather keep in if I’m CBJ.

As mentioned below in my other reply, definitely would entertain throwing guys like Gushchin and such into the mix. And if we take out Hill that only puts up more prospects if that’s up your alley.


Completely fair.
I dont think SJS would part with any pieces except for a Meier Laine swap but Meiers play last year definitely puts the favour in SJ as both players had their personal years of struggle but I would say recency bias would factor in based on Meiers overall dominance.

Id be willing to part with better prospects than Coe (but I don’t think Coe is a low quality prospect just FYI, higher on him than Ozzy) and maybe go Gushchin/ Ozzy/ Merkley (Ryan) but I don’t think SJ would entertain moving Eklund, Bordeleau.

Oh yeah - just food for thought if Laine was willing/ wanting to move and CBJ wanted to load up for a deep run by 2024-26.


If San Jose don't want to move Eklund for the player who has scored the most number of U24 goals in the last 10 years not named Matthews, Pastrnak or McDavid I don't really know waht to tell them.
See All