SalarySwishSalarySwish

What this team could look like

Created by: ChiHawk
Team: 2025-26 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 26, 2023
Published: Oct. 26, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Hawks are going to have their core ready for the 2025/2026 to start competing; maybe a last entry into the playoffs but in 2026/2027 look out. This is just a best guess at this point...obviously other prospects are in the system.

The Hawks have a real shot at either Celebrini or Eiserman this year and I do think Levshunov is in the mix of the top 3, potentially taken #2 but Hawks should pass as they need top 6 more immediately. With all the extra draft capital in the 2023 draft (late 1st, 3 2nds and 2 3rds) I do expect them to select a couple of RHD guys preparing for Murphy eventually being gone and Seth Jones declining. I'm high on Sam Rinzel though, and think he could be 2nd liner.

I do think they make a big splash to round out the top 6 either next summer or the following summer and RW is a gap. There are several RW guys at this point available over the next two free agent periods.

There are several more prospects that could make a run for the team, but at this point this is my best projection.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,100,000
3$1,100,000
3$2,500,000
3$3,000,000
3$4,000,000
3$4,000,000
3$4,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$9,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3$950,000
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$87,500,000$55,777,500$0$4,925,000$31,722,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 1
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Celebrini, Macklin
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,000$825,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, C, RW
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$896,667$896,667
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$931,667$931,667
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$855,833$855,833
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$825,000$825,000
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Oct. 26, 2023 at 4:22 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Really need to get Reichel over to the wing as you've shown here. I like Rinzel too, think he will take another season after this at least before he joins, maybe even another after that depending. Im also quite high on Vlasic.
exo2769, Garak, RicXX and 1 other person liked this.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 8:08 a.m.
#2
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,703
Likes: 9,860
I'm not convinced Top 6 is a bigger area of concern vs RD though. And I really don't like the "more immediate" thing there. (No offense, sorry if perceived that way) The build will take as long as it takes. If you have a top 3 pick, make sure you draft best available. I feel for Dach because he can't stay healthy which sucks, but that wasn't exactly a hit. We don't have a #1 RD. Levshunov looks like he's that guy. I'd actually argue the opposite to you, a #1 RD (IF that's what Levshunov turns out to be) is more important than a top 6 forward. You can find top 6 forwards in the NHL...#1 RD you won't find in the UFA market. They're locked up.

Oh, and I'd try to get as many picks as possible at the TDL and move up in the draft. Let's say you have (4) 2nd rounders. Per sound of hockey, of you take the average 2nd and multiply by 4...just because we don't know where they land yet...you can get a #13OA pick. I'd 100% do that if we had a taker. We need high end talent more that more picks imo.
Garak and SociallyHawkward liked this.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 8:24 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,937
Likes: 10,754
Quoting: exo2769
I'm not convinced Top 6 is a bigger area of concern vs RD though. And I really don't like the "more immediate" thing there. (No offense, sorry if perceived that way) The build will take as long as it takes. If you have a top 3 pick, make sure you draft best available. I feel for Dach because he can't stay healthy which sucks, but that wasn't exactly a hit. We don't have a #1 RD. Levshunov looks like he's that guy. I'd actually argue the opposite to you, a #1 RD (IF that's what Levshunov turns out to be) is more important than a top 6 forward. You can find top 6 forwards in the NHL...#1 RD you won't find in the UFA market. They're locked up.

Oh, and I'd try to get as many picks as possible at the TDL and move up in the draft. Let's say you have (4) 2nd rounders. Per sound of hockey, of you take the average 2nd and multiply by 4...just because we don't know where they land yet...you can get a #13OA pick. I'd 100% do that if we had a taker. We need high end talent more that more picks imo.


I am definitely convinced top 6 is more important than RD. We have Jones for 7 more years, Murphy for 3 more, Rinzel is looking like he won't take as long as originally predicted, and Kelley is having a decent year. Some positions could always be addressed through free agency or trades, if/when it becomes necessary, and RD kind of fits the bill for that. Most of what have right now for forwards seem like 2nd liners tops. We need another BIG talent to play with Bedard on the top line, IMO. Someone who can think the game the way and speed he does. But, we'll see. I do certainly want to add RHD to our pool. But I don't think we need to use a top pick on an RHD right now. I'd strongly consider guys like Mews, Elick, Cristoforo, etc. with that TBL pick or in the early 2nd round, depending where the rankings end up and the picks land.

Side note: VAN has an absolute WEALTH of RHD out of the 2023 draft. Bruzcewicz, Willander, and A. Celebrini are ALL hitting for them. If we can figure out a way to steal one of them away, that would also help our RHD pool.
exo2769, RicXX and ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 8:43 a.m.
#4
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,703
Likes: 9,860
Quoting: Garak
I am definitely convinced top 6 is more important than RD. We have Jones for 7 more years, Murphy for 3 more, Rinzel is looking like he won't take as long as originally predicted, and Kelley is having a decent year. Some positions could always be addressed through free agency or trades, if/when it becomes necessary, and RD kind of fits the bill for that. Most of what have right now for forwards seem like 2nd liners tops. We need another BIG talent to play with Bedard on the top line, IMO. Someone who can think the game the way and speed he does. But, we'll see. I do certainly want to add RHD to our pool. But I don't think we need to use a top pick on an RHD right now. I'd strongly consider guys like Mews, Elick, Cristoforo, etc. with that TBL pick or in the early 2nd round, depending where the rankings end up and the picks land.

Side note: VAN has an absolute WEALTH of RHD out of the 2023 draft. Bruzcewicz, Willander, and A. Celebrini are ALL hitting for them. If we can figure out a way to steal one of them away, that would also help our RHD pool.


So you don't think Moore/Nazar/Reichel can play a top 6 role? If we're on the same page that Rinzel can be a 2nd pair guy...and at least I do believe so far he can do that....and...that Seth Jones is getting older. We don't have a #1 RD in 4 years. Is 34 Seth Jones a #1 RD? I just see that as a bigger need. I'm not saying if you get the #1 OA that you force yourself to Levshunov. You draft best available, but I don't see Demidov as a better choice than Levshunov.
RicXX, SociallyHawkward, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Oct. 26, 2023 at 9:16 a.m.
#5
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,308
Likes: 4,487
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Really need to get Reichel over to the wing as you've shown here. I like Rinzel too, think he will take another season after this at least before he joins, maybe even another after that depending. Im also quite high on Vlasic.


I agree, the Reichel at center experiment has been a complete disaster, it’s time to move him back to the wing

And honestly I knew that experiment wasn’t going to work, he didn’t play center when he was called up last year so I thought it was quite a bad decision
RicXX, ChiHawk and Aussie_Blackhawk liked this.
See All