ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

PLAYERS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

RicXX

Cup Whore

Member Since

Jan. 9, 2018

Favourite Team

Chicago Blackhawks

Forum Posts

413

Posts per Day

0.2

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GM8 hours ago

Thread: Upgraded top 4 bottom 6 backup means playoffs

Sorry Hawks don't need another small LD.

Forum: Armchair-GM8 hours ago

Thread: Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Newtown</b></div><div>Hawks would EASILY accept. 9.5 million for 7 years is impossible to dump. Watching Seth Jones uninspired play was difficult last year. Imagine another 7 years and almost 70 million. He’s eating 11.5% of your cap. What kind of player do you think 9.5 million over 7 years would buy you in UFA? Let me answer that for you — ANY ****ing player.</div></div>

Ok then, Seth Jones declines. He has the NMC and has the final say... Hawks just wouldn't let it get to that.

Forum: Armchair-GM9 hours ago

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I wonder how many teams will actually be desperate this year and how many will just opt to tough things out until the cap increase next summer. It'll be interesting to see.</div></div>

Absolutely, many GMs weighing these options and their jobs I'm sure.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 7:11 p.m.

Thread: Has To Be Done

I'm not so sure on that Chicago deal...

Only if you buy the beer... LMAO

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 7:08 p.m.

Thread: Playoff Hockey Ready Leafs

I'm not 100%, but I believe Chicago says yes to this.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 7:06 p.m.

Thread: Lets see

Chicago says deal, no take backies!

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 6:06 p.m.

Thread: Ideas

I could see CHI adding CAL 2023 3rd, but not the NYR 2nd.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 6:05 p.m.

Thread: Vancouver Fans yes or no

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMBL</b></div><div>That just means they would need to be getting a player who is just as marketable which would be McDavid or Matthews. I don't think CHI would take any package with Matthews for Bedard since currently there's the prospect of CHI potentially having both if Matthews tests FA.

McDavid on the other hand has 3-years until UFA which is a whole lot less than 8-years of potentially having Bedard, but it's possible that could be offset in a multipiece deal. The base of the deal though would have to be a 1 for 1 for either side to even consider.

I think Zegras+2OV would be a compelling offer as well but still not enough to pull the trigger with confidence.

A package around Jack Hughes might be enough assuming he's marketable enough, especially if it's Jack+Luke Hughes for Bedard.</div></div>

Love your lines of thinking here, that's what I make these critical thinking posts for.

The Lindros effect, could the return be equal or better than what is being given up.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 6:00 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Some of these are pretty rich returns, but all are decent cap dump candidates.</div></div>

Ya it was up for debate, with what else would be good for the Hawks obviously lol

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:58 p.m.

Thread: Stupid Experiment

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mtm816</b></div><div>CHI has 1 LD currently rostered, and ever hear of trade fodder?</div></div>

Chicago has enough LD in there prospect pool to fill multiple teams... and they are all better than the prospect offered.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 9:04 p.m.

Thread: Would they though

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IDKtbh</b></div><div>No, they wouldn’t.</div></div>

Which side wouldn't? Or neither?

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 9:03 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>He's a 70 point guy.... he's many things, not a cap dump</div></div>

I dropped Reinheart.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 9:01 p.m.

Thread: Vancouver Fans yes or no

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac555</b></div><div>No team could build a package that could make Chicago trade this pick. That isn’t hyperbole - not a single team.</div></div>

It's just for fun, let's see what they offer...

I am a Hawks fan, and I can't wait to see Bedard pull the sweater over his head!

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 9:00 p.m.

Thread: Vancouver Fans yes or no

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Victor24</b></div><div>It's a no. Trading two young and great players on top of very high draft picks for one player is a bad strategy.
Now if it were Pett and Hughes for Bedard, it would be much closer.</div></div>

Hmmm interesting... lol

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 8:37 p.m.

Thread: penguins

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks probably accept. That's fair value to move up to #14.</div></div>

I think the first and second gets it done at least by the pick value.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 8:32 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Reinhart? Why Reinhart?</div></div>

Saw someone post a dump of him just put it in... probably delete it as now 3 votes he shouldn't be there.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 8:01 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SNipeSHowInc</b></div><div>If they are getting nothing back they decline. Yeah buying him out is the better option than trading a first and getting nothing in return</div></div>

If you notice none of the trades had anything, and I put it in the description. Probably would be NYR or TBL 2nd in return.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 7:59 p.m.

Thread: Stupid Experiment

Chicago says no, you need to pay to rid those pieces not get paid to take them. Chicago doesn't need anymore LD either.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 7:58 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SNipeSHowInc</b></div><div>Leafs decline :)</div></div>

I didn't put what they were getting back... you of the feeling they should just buy him out?

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 7:49 p.m.

Thread: Making Edmonton better

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks decline. Takes more than a one round pick swap to dump 2 years of Ceci. And doubt the Hawks would take him anyway.

CBJ declines. No GM is giving up anything to acquire Campbell. That contract takes multiple 1st's to dump.

Tampa Bay declines. They can't afford to take on Kulak's cap hit.</div></div>

It's not even one round in the same draft. It's the 2025 3rd.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:53 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brady_t12</b></div><div>Nice critical thinking skills. 31 goals and 67 points this season and multiple huge goals in the playoffs for a team in the finals making 6.5M for one more year is a cap dump. Yep. That makes sense.</div></div>

Hey I can't track every player, I did take a few from other AGCMs. That's why I noted it in the description.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:51 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Billy739</b></div><div>Gally will stay until he's offered a deal from a playoff team
We have no reason to move him and no need to cut him for cap space.
Most of our contracts that are Dead Weight are gone or are done in the next 2 years.
Longterm we can afford to keep Gally and Anderson until their deals are done with no real issues.
Gets a little tight in Matheson's final year only if we Sign PLD and Caufield above 9m each but beyond that we can manage it</div></div>

Figured you would make an appearance lmao. That's why I added it hahaha. One vote against Gally, got it :)

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:50 p.m.

Thread: Cap Dumps to Consider

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brady_t12</b></div><div>At first, I was just disgusted by your valuations of what it costs to dump a player, but then I saw you trading for Reinhart as a cap dump and realized this is just a troll. Good job 👍🏼</div></div>

I saw it in another AGCM, just made the jump to add it. You say no to him being a dump ok, one vote :)

Forum: Armchair-GMMon. at 6:33 p.m.

Thread: Big Job

I believe it would take more to move Gallagher. Maybe add Calgarys 2025 1st, or Montreals 2025 2nd.

Forum: Armchair-GMSun. at 12:18 p.m.

Thread: Hawks movn on up

You have the Hawks 1OA pick not Tampas. I'm sure it's just a pick click mistake.

Page 1

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2023 CapFriendly.com