Quoting: Salzy
So a player that isn’t signed doesn’t have lower value than he would if he was signed? That’s a joke if I’ve ever heard one, seems like you’re the typical delusional Toronto fan a top 10-15 wing doesn’t equal a top pair Dman, funny how you talk about being serious though “Dont under value my teams player but let me do that to yours” get out of here with that garbage, I never said Nylander had no value, I said he is valuable, just not worth a top pair Dman, especially while he isn’t signed. And I never said Manson is worth Nylander +, although in the current scenario he would be since Toronto has 0 leverage in the deal and the Ducks have 0 reason to trade Manson
Who would trade anything for a player that they don't know they can sign. Come on man, don't get silly here. If anyone wants to trade for Nylander they will be given permission to offer him a contract and then make the trade once he's agreed to it in principal. That's how these work, and everyone knows that. This whole "his value is getting really low" stuff is just opposing fans wanting to see Toronto bleed a little. It has no basis in reality.
I've repeatedly said that a top 15 RW isn't worth a top 15 defenceman. But tell me, who is the top 15 defenceman being traded to the Leafs? Is Brett Pesce a top 15 defenceman? Not even close.
Who am I overvaluing and who am I undervaluing?
The thing I keep getting blasted for is saying Pesce isn't equal to Nylander, he just isn't. Pesce is a defensive defenceman who is worth about 4 million a year. He is on a fair contract for what he does. Pretty much everyone agrees on that.
Nylander is worth about 6.5 to 7 mill a season, pretty much everyone agrees on that as well.
So I say they are not equal nor are they worth the same. Then everyone loses their minds and tells me I am overvaluing a winger and undervaluing a defenceman.
So explain to me, how a player is worth 4 million salary wise but somehow worth more in a trade than a player who is worth 6.5 million salary wise?