SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What to do with Marner

Created by: JTrades
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 6, 2019
Published: Aug. 6, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
You've probably read or heard the article about the leafs offering Marner 9-11M. Today I've been thinking and at what dollar amount is Marner more valuable as a trade chip. I would hate to lose him but I don't like him at 11m.
This got me thinking. What should the leafs look for in return for him?
I highly doubt this trade would ever happen. Just having fun
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$8,500,000
Trades
1.
TOR
    6th or 7th round pick. I don't see a place for him on this team after last year
    ANA
    1. Holl, Justin
    Additional Details:
    Any team or waivers
    2.
    TOR
    1. Boeser, Brock [RFA Rights]
    2. Juolevi, Olli
    3. 2020 2nd round pick (VAN)
    VAN
    1. Marner, Mitchell [RFA Rights]
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the CBJ
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the VGK
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CAR
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the STL
    Logo of the WPG
    2021
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2022
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$80,523,032$0$1,450,000$976,968
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,634,000$11,634,000
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,200,000$3,200,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $775,000$775,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $700,000$700,000
    C, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $700,000$700,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $700,000$700,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $863,333$863,333
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$1,450,000$1M)
    LD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $725,000$725,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,300,000$5,300,000
    RW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $675,000$675,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    RW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $700,000$700,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:04 p.m.
    #1
    Rangers
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 445
    Likes: 114
    This is probably the best Marner trade I've seen.
    SammyT_51, Snipshow4416 and TanSor liked this.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:06 p.m.
    #2
    PhoneyAnteater
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 235
    Likes: 82
    I don't think a Marner trade would happen unless the team trading for him could figure out a contract beforehand.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:08 p.m.
    #3
    GM Hockeysaurus Rex
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2016
    Posts: 14,152
    Likes: 5,738
    Quoting: Rangers13232
    This is probably the best Marner trade I've seen.


    As a Leafs fan.. I like it! Maybe I will change Juolevi to some RHD like Woo or some other D prospect but honestly this is a nice refresher of a trade. Boeser would fit nicely in Leafs.
    Snipshow4416 and TanSor liked this.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:10 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 942
    Likes: 207
    holy crap a Leafs fan that actually knows what he's talking about. Not saying this will happen but it actually makes sense. Usually just see copies of crappy trades but this ones decent.
    Snipshow4416 and SammyT_51 liked this.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:11 p.m.
    #5
    LEAFSandBRUINSfan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 1,492
    Likes: 461
    Quoting: Phoneyanteater123
    I don't think a Marner trade would happen unless the team trading for him could figure out a contract beforehand.

    Honestly wouldn’t be that big of a deal
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:15 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2018
    Posts: 319
    Likes: 99
    Van doesn't have the cap space to sign marner
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:15 p.m.
    #7
    BleuBlancEtRouge
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 152
    Likes: 50
    No from the Canucks. To give up Juolevi and Boeser doesn't make sense for the rebuilding Canucks and asking for a 2nd rounder on top of that is being greedy
    Goulet liked this.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:22 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2017
    Posts: 1,930
    Likes: 418
    The Leafs would like, maybe love this deal however, Vancouver wouldn't.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:24 p.m.
    #9
    GM Hockeysaurus Rex
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2016
    Posts: 14,152
    Likes: 5,738
    Quoting: Goulet
    The Leafs would like, maybe love this deal however, Vancouver wouldn't.


    I think Vancouver too would like that deal a lot.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:29 p.m.
    #10
    Marner Enthusiast
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 4,396
    Likes: 996
    Quoting: Rangers13232
    This is probably the best Marner trade I've seen.


    Quoting: Phoneyanteater123
    I don't think a Marner trade would happen unless the team trading for him could figure out a contract beforehand.


    Quoting: SammyT_51
    As a Leafs fan.. I like it! Maybe I will change Juolevi to some RHD like Woo or some other D prospect but honestly this is a nice refresher of a trade. Boeser would fit nicely in Leafs.


    Quoting: JelloPony
    holy crap a Leafs fan that actually knows what he's talking about. Not saying this will happen but it actually makes sense. Usually just see copies of crappy trades but this ones decent.


    Quoting: Snipshow4416
    Honestly wouldn’t be that big of a deal


    Quoting: beavereater
    Van doesn't have the cap space to sign marner


    Quoting: Jame5man
    No from the Canucks. To give up Juolevi and Boeser doesn't make sense for the rebuilding Canucks and asking for a 2nd rounder on top of that is being greedy


    Quoting: Goulet
    The Leafs would like, maybe love this deal however, Vancouver wouldn't.


    What I don’t understand is when someone gives Boeser a 7 year deal worth 8.5 million AAV, no one complains. But when someone gives Marner 10 million AAV for the same term, everyone starts crying and calling it an overpay. Why is that? Cuz I think Marner is far better than Boeser.
    FedererSmooth liked this.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:31 p.m.
    #11
    LEAFSandBRUINSfan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 1,492
    Likes: 461
    Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
    What I don’t understand is when someone gives Boeser a 7 year deal worth 8.5 million AAV, no one complains. But when someone gives Marner 10 million AAV for the same term, everyone starts crying and calling it an overpay. Why is that? Cuz I think Marner is far better than Boeser.


    I’m 100% fine with a 7x10. I disagree with 10 million when it’s on a 3 year term
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:34 p.m.
    #12
    Marner Enthusiast
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 4,396
    Likes: 996
    Quoting: Snipshow4416
    I’m 100% fine with a 7x10. I disagree with 10 million when it’s on a 3 year term


    Yes you might be fine with it, but I’m sure there are many Leaf fans who aren’t.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:35 p.m.
    #13
    LEAFSandBRUINSfan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 1,492
    Likes: 461
    Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
    Yes you might be fine with it, but I’m sure there are many Leaf fans who aren’t.


    I don’t see why they would that will be a good contract in after the new tv deal
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:38 p.m.
    #14
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,818
    Likes: 22,839
    The out of playoffs Canucks might like the on the ice value , but look at the Canucks cap. Doubt if they can squeeze in signed Marner who might cost 3m more than Boesner
    beavereater liked this.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:40 p.m.
    #15
    Marner Enthusiast
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 4,396
    Likes: 996
    Quoting: Snipshow4416
    I don’t see why they would that will be a good contract in after the new tv deal


    @SammyT_51 What’d you guys think of Olli Juolevi? Is he a bust?
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:42 p.m.
    #16
    LEAFSandBRUINSfan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 1,492
    Likes: 461
    Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
    @SammyT_51 What’d you guys think of Olli Juolevi? Is he a bust?


    Not busy but not a top 5 pick
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:44 p.m.
    #17
    Marner Enthusiast
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 4,396
    Likes: 996
    Quoting: Snipshow4416
    Not busy but not a top 5 pick


    He was once speculated as the video game addict. Then it turned out to be Rubstov and Jones, who did not match Marek’s report at all.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 2:57 p.m.
    #18
    BleuBlancEtRouge
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 152
    Likes: 50
    Quoting: Snipshow4416
    Not busy but not a top 5 pick


    Parayko wasn't signed to his ELC until age 22, Ryan Ellis didn't start in the NHL until he was 20 and didn't play a full year until 22. Subban was 21 at the start of hi first full season.
    Reach, maybe but he hasn't played yet so we don't know. Ellis by the way was an 11th overall pick. When he's 25 we can make that distinction. Until then he has a lot of development to do.
    palhal liked this.
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:00 p.m.
    #19
    LEAFSandBRUINSfan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 1,492
    Likes: 461
    Quoting: Jame5man
    Parayko wasn't signed to his ELC until age 22, Ryan Ellis didn't start in the NHL until he was 20 and didn't play a full year until 22. Subban was 21 at the start of hi first full season.
    Reach, maybe but he hasn't played yet so we don't know. Ellis by the way was an 11th overall pick. When he's 25 we can make that distinction. Until then he has a lot of development to do.


    That’s why I said he wasn’t a bust
    Aug. 6, 2019 at 3:06 p.m.
    #20
    BleuBlancEtRouge
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 152
    Likes: 50
    Quoting: Snipshow4416
    That’s why I said he wasn’t a bust


    right but he still could be top 5. Sure you want an impact sooner with that draft position. But that doesn't mean he can't be worth it
    Snipshow4416 liked this.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:19 a.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 942
    Likes: 207
    Quoting: BrandonDubinskyGOAT
    What I don’t understand is when someone gives Boeser a 7 year deal worth 8.5 million AAV, no one complains. But when someone gives Marner 10 million AAV for the same term, everyone starts crying and calling it an overpay. Why is that? Cuz I think Marner is far better than Boeser.


    I think around 10 mil is what Marner is going to get and yes Marner is better then Boeser but Boeser plus the rest of the package is worth it and keeps the Leafs under the cap.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll