Ideas

RESERVE LIST	YEARS	CAP HIT
Král, Filip	3	$925,000
Stotts, Riley	3	$925,000

RFA	YEARS	CAP HIT
Mikheyev, Ilya	2	$1,500,000
Gauthier, Frédérik	2	$700,000
Paul, Nicholas	4	$2,000,000

UFA	YEARS	CAP HIT
Spezza, Jason	1	$700,000
Clifford, Kyle	2	$1,000,000
Thornton, Joe	1	$700,000
Rutta, Jan	2	$1,000,000

CREATED	YEARS	CAP HIT
Bocharov, Ivan	2	$925,000

ROSTER SIZE	SALARY CAP	CAP HIT	OVERAGES	BONUSES	CAP SPACE
22	$81,500,000	$77,937,283	$0	$0	$3,562,717

Left Wing	Centre	Right Wing
Hyman, Zach $2,250,000$2,250,000 RW, LW M-NTC UFA - 1	Matthews, Auston $11,640,250$11,640,250 C UFA - 4	Marner, Mitchell $10,903,000$10,903,000 RW UFA - 5
Nylander, William $6,962,366$6,962,366 RW UFA - 4	Tavares, John $11,000,000$11,000,000 C, LW NMC UFA - 5	Kapanen, Kasperi $3,200,000$3,200,000 RW UFA - 2
Engvall, Pierre $1,250,000$1,250,000 RW, LW UFA - 2	Paul, Nicholas $2,000,000$2,000,000 C, LW UFA - 2	Mikheyev, Ilya $1,500,000$1,500,000 LW, RW UFA - 2
	Thornton, Joe $700,000$700,000 C, LW UFA - 1	Spezza, Jason $700,000$700,000 C, RW UFA - 1
Clifford, Kyle $1,000,000$1,000,000 LW UFA - 2	Gauthier, Frédérik $700,000$700,000 C UFA - 1

Left Defense	Right Defense	Goaltender
Rielly, Morgan $5,000,000$5,000,000 LD M-NTC UFA - 2	Savard, David $1,062,500$1,062,500 RD UFA - 1	Andersen, Frederik $5,000,000$5,000,000 G M-NTC UFA - 1
Muzzin, Jake $5,625,000$5,625,000 LD NMC UFA - 4	Holl, Justin $2,000,000$2,000,000 RD M-NTC UFA - 3	Campbell, Jack $1,650,000$1,650,000 G UFA - 2
Sandin, Rasmus $894,167$894,167 LD UFA - 2	Rutta, Jan $1,000,000$1,000,000 LD/RD UFA - 2
Marincin, Martin $700,000$700,000 LD UFA - 1

Power Play 1
Nylander, W.	Tavares, J.	Matthews, A.
	Rielly, M.	Marner, M.

Power Play 2
Hyman, Z.	Thornton, J.	Kapanen, K.
	Sandin, R.	Spezza, J.

Penalty Kill 2
	Hyman, Z.	Kapanen, K.
	Muzzin, J.	Holl, J.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:04 a.m.

#1

Copenhagen

Joined: May 2019

Posts: 6,649

Likes: 2,517

If i am Columbus I would hang up the phone.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:06 a.m.

#2

aadoyle

Thread Starter

Hakuna Matata

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 34,128

Likes: 20,983

Edited Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:15 a.m.

Quoting: Copenhagen

If i am Columbus I would hang up the phone.

lul they would pass on a guy who has had 2 40point seasons and his first year as a center has 28 points for a guy whose has 1 year left and is slowing down i dont think so. Sure savard is good but he only has a year left making his value less a one for one trade with kerfoot and him is fair. As for bracco fresh start on a new team can sign him to league min or flip him in another trade

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:15 a.m.

#3

Copenhagen

Joined: May 2019

Posts: 6,649

Likes: 2,517

Quoting: aadoyle

lul they would pass on a guy who has had 2 40point seasons and his first year as a center has 28 points for a guy whose has 1 year left and is slowing down i dont think so. Sure savard is good but he only has a year left making his value less a one for one trade with kerfoot and him is fair.

I would pass yes. Kerfoot is playing against other teams 3rd and 4th lines. Not a big whoop. Savard is playing first line minutes (since Jones injury) and plugs 20 minutes a night every year. He is a minute muncher. Very very important to have on the roster. Every team needs a guy like that. Savard is a stud. Kerfoot is buck a shuck oyster and Bracco is worth nothing. IMO

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:20 a.m.

#4

aadoyle

Thread Starter

Hakuna Matata

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 34,128

Likes: 20,983

Quoting: Copenhagen

I would pass yes. Kerfoot is playing against other teams 3rd and 4th lines. Not a big whoop. Savard is playing first line minutes (since Jones injury) and plugs 20 minutes a night every year. He is a minute muncher. Very very important to have on the roster. Every team needs a guy like that. Savard is a stud. Kerfoot is buck a shuck oyster and Bracco is worth nothing. IMO

i have seen this trade posted before and columbus fans have said its fine. Some people even attempted to overpay for the Savard and were told by columbus fans it was an overpayment. If columbus rejects leafs dont care they can look elsewhere as many teams would love to have kerfoot especially on that contract.

Copenhagen liked this.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:24 a.m.

#5

Ajp_18

Joined: Mar. 2018

Posts: 9,851

Likes: 6,441

Sorry... the appeal for Kerfoot has died in Columbus. We need a second line center... not another 3rd line guy. We have Wennberg and Jenner for 3rd lines already. Also Bracco isn’t anything of value to Columbus. He’s yet another depth RW... he’d be stuck in the AHL again.

Maybe if the trade were to also have Holl to kinda replace Savard maybe Columbus does it, but as it stands the value might be fine, there’s just really no interest in the trade from a Columbus stand point. The only difference between Kerfoot and Wennberg is their contracts... oh and the fact that Wennberg has a 59 point season under his belt.. Kerfoots max was 40 but he’s also younger.

This trade could happen at the deadline if Peeke is able to take over the top 4 role from Savard though, so it’s not a no, it’s more of a not yet.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:31 a.m.

#6

aadoyle

Thread Starter

Hakuna Matata

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 34,128

Likes: 20,983

Quoting: Ajp_18

Sorry... the appeal for Kerfoot has died in Columbus. We need a second line center... not another 3rd line guy. We have Wennberg and Jenner for 3rd lines already. Also Bracco isn’t anything of value to Columbus. He’s yet another depth RW... he’d be stuck in the AHL again.

Maybe if the trade were to also have Holl to kinda replace Savard maybe Columbus does it, but as it stands the value might be fine, there’s just really no interest in the trade from a Columbus stand point. The only difference between Kerfoot and Wennberg is their contracts... oh and the fact that Wennberg has a 59 point season under his belt.. Kerfoots max was 40 but he’s also younger.

This trade could happen at the deadline if Peeke is able to take over the top 4 role from Savard though, so it’s not a no, it’s more of a not yet.

Holls story has been big here and not sure if toronto wants to part from him. I would offer Král, Filip but people who have seen him and who he has played with have told me he could be big in a few years. Then again trading holl for savard could be worth if not toronto could provide a 2nd with kerfoot as with my other trade we have an extra. So would kerfoot a 2nd and if I switch things up dermott for him.

So a 2nd pick kerfoot and dermott for savard (some people have said throw in anderson i said nah i believe columbus would regret trading him as he could bounce back)

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:49 a.m.

#7

LeafsFanForSomeReason

Joined: Jan. 2020

Posts: 6,793

Likes: 5,278

Quoting: Copenhagen

I would pass yes. Kerfoot is playing against other teams 3rd and 4th lines. Not a big whoop.

Kerfoot and Savard actually rank in the same percentile in %time against elite players.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 2:35 a.m.

#8

Sagecoll

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 6,730

Likes: 1,559

tbh CBJ should run away with that Toronto deal.

unless they think they can get more at the deadline next year. But this seems like a really good opportunity to get younger. Dermott is awesome and cost controlled, Kerfoot is a solid middle 6 C and Savard (despite playing big high leverage defensive mins) had an absolute down year offensively (as did most of Columbus), but was also really carried defensively by Gavrikov.

I'd say 3 years of Kerfoot and like 5 years of Dermott PLUS a 2nd brings more value than 1 year of Savard.

The main problem is that Dermott is a LHD.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 2:39 a.m.

#9

aadoyle

Thread Starter

Hakuna Matata

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 34,128

Likes: 20,983

Quoting: Sagecoll

tbh CBJ should run away with that Toronto deal.

unless they think they can get more at the deadline next year. But this seems like a really good opportunity to get younger. Dermott is awesome and cost controlled, Kerfoot is a solid middle 6 C and Savard (despite playing big high leverage defensive mins) had an absolute down year offensively (as did most of Columbus), but was also really carried defensively by Gavrikov.

I'd say 3 years of Kerfoot and like 5 years of Dermott PLUS a 2nd brings more value than 1 year of Savard.

The main problem is that Dermott is a LHD.

Dermott can play Rd and he's not bad at it.with the excellent coaches in Columbus he should settle fine on the right side. Also knew my revamped deal would be better received lul. I took what muzzin got and applied it to savard except I swapped the first for a 2nd and gave kerfoot as a difference maker

Mar. 31, 2020 at 3:02 a.m.

#10

Sagecoll

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 6,730

Likes: 1,559

Quoting: aadoyle

Dermott can play Rd and he's not bad at it.with the excellent coaches in Columbus he should settle fine on the right side. Also knew my revamped deal would be better received lul. I took what muzzin got and applied it to savard except I swapped the first for a 2nd and gave kerfoot as a difference maker

I just don't see this making sense for Toronto (certainly not for Dubas)....

Mar. 31, 2020 at 4:18 a.m.

#11

aadoyle

Thread Starter

Hakuna Matata

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 34,128

Likes: 20,983

Quoting: Sagecoll

I just don't see this making sense for Toronto (certainly not for Dubas)....

Toronto can't keep dermott our left side is locked (rielly, muzzin, sandin) and we need to upgrade our defense and if it means losing dermott so be it. Dubas will be looking for someone like savard who can come cheap and boost our defense in the summer otherwise this team aint getting far in a cup run

Mar. 31, 2020 at 7:15 a.m.

#12

palhal

LongtimeLeafsufferer

Joined: Jul. 2015

Posts: 59,601

Likes: 22,712

That's way too much to give up for one year of Savard. Oh, the fascination with a right handing shooting Dman. Others team have left shooting Dman playing the right side, but seems like the Leafs can't.
If Paul is truly a legit 3C, the Sens don't trade him for Johnsson and three non NHLers. But really Paul hasn't proved he NHL capable

Mar. 31, 2020 at 8:16 a.m.

#13

Leafsfan34

Banned

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 437

Likes: 138

Quoting: Ajp_18

Sorry... the appeal for Kerfoot has died in Columbus. We need a second line center... not another 3rd line guy. We have Wennberg and Jenner for 3rd lines already. Also Bracco isn’t anything of value to Columbus. He’s yet another depth RW... he’d be stuck in the AHL again.

Maybe if the trade were to also have Holl to kinda replace Savard maybe Columbus does it, but as it stands the value might be fine, there’s just really no interest in the trade from a Columbus stand point. The only difference between Kerfoot and Wennberg is their contracts... oh and the fact that Wennberg has a 59 point season under his belt.. Kerfoots max was 40 but he’s also younger.

This trade could happen at the deadline if Peeke is able to take over the top 4 role from Savard though, so it’s not a no, it’s more of a not yet.

The appeal for Savard has died. Leafs need a guy on term. Someone like Murphy or signing a guy like Demelo or Tanev.
Savard isn't the one to carry us

Mar. 31, 2020 at 10:35 a.m.

#14

Sagecoll

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 6,730

Likes: 1,559

Quoting: aadoyle

Toronto can't keep dermott our left side is locked (rielly, muzzin, sandin) and we need to upgrade our defense and if it means losing dermott so be it. Dubas will be looking for someone like savard who can come cheap and boost our defense in the summer otherwise this team aint getting far in a cup run

tbh, I don't think Savard is an upgrade over Dermott, and that doesn't take into account any of the age/team control differences...That alone makes the trade non-sensical.

Just go after a team with too many right Dmen like Buffalo. Can't you do like Kerfoot for Miller or something?

Mar. 31, 2020 at 10:57 a.m.

#15

awsomemathews

Joined: Feb. 2018

Posts: 46

Likes: 4

You would be selling way too low on Dermott right now. His value should be considerably higher possibly as soon as the trade deadline.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.

#16

aadoyle

Thread Starter

Hakuna Matata

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 34,128

Likes: 20,983

Edited Mar. 31, 2020 at 12:50 p.m.

Quoting: Sagecoll

tbh, I don't think Savard is an upgrade over Dermott, and that doesn't take into account any of the age/team control differences...That alone makes the trade non-sensical.

Just go after a team with too many right Dmen like Buffalo. Can't you do like Kerfoot for Miller or something?

Savard would be an upgrade over dermott. This team needs a dman who can block shots and is a beast in his own zone. Savard is that guy. Sure he is old but he is a true RD that could be a perfect partner for rielly. As for Miller is not a good option. He had 1 good season with Vegas than crashed. buffalo kept him mostly in the pressbox this season which is not a good look for him. Out of all buffalos RD montour would probs be the best option but buffalo probs aint trading him and it would be expensive.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 12:56 p.m.

#17

Sagecoll

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 6,730

Likes: 1,559

Quoting: aadoyle

Savard would be an upgrade over dermott. This team needs a dman who can block shots and is a beast in his own zone. Savard is that guy. Sure he is old but he is a true RD that could be a perfect partner for rielly. As for Miller is not a good option. He had 1 good season with Vegas than crashed. buffalo kept him mostly in the pressbox this season which is not a good look for him. Out of all buffalos RD montour would probs be the best option but buffalo probs aint trading him and it would be expensive.

Your talent evaluation...is concerning.

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:02 p.m.

#18

aadoyle

Thread Starter

Hakuna Matata

Joined: Feb. 2020

Posts: 34,128

Likes: 20,983

Quoting: Sagecoll

Your talent evaluation...is concerning.

https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/hockey/news/sabres-colin-miller-heading-to-press-box/

As for savard ever since jones got hurt he has stellped up big time on the first pairing.

Dermott may be doing good now but he aint worth keeping. Those numbers were of him primarily on the Left side with one season on the right.

As for Montour hes just finding his place with buffalo

If toronto keeps dermott and puts him on the right it wont work for us. We will have rielly, muzzin, sandin on LD and Dermott, Holl, Liligren on the right. Thats a downgrade on defense and that team wont get anywhere. heck they would have to be outscoring there problems again which is not what cup teams should do

Mar. 31, 2020 at 1:21 p.m.

#19

Sagecoll

Joined: May 2017

Posts: 6,730

Likes: 1,559

Quoting: aadoyle

https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/hockey/news/sabres-colin-miller-heading-to-press-box/

As for savard ever since jones got hurt he has stellped up big time on the first pairing.

Dermott may be doing good now but he aint worth keeping. Those numbers were of him primarily on the Left side with one season on the right.

As for Montour hes just finding his place with buffalo

If toronto keeps dermott and puts him on the right it wont work for us. We will have rielly, muzzin, sandin on LD and Dermott, Holl, Liligren on the right. Thats a downgrade on defense and that team wont get anywhere. heck they would have to be outscoring there problems again which is not what cup teams should do

Savard has been carried by Gavrikov. His numbers without him are bad....

As for Montour, that chart included all of his time with Anaheim...Miller had a better season in Buffalo and Montour has been there longer lol...

Again, there are major concerns here with your talent evaluation...

Not sure if you want to hold up Buffalo coaching decisions as a basis for correctness...

Draft	Round 1	Round 2	Round 3	Round 4	Round 5	Round 6	Round 7
2020
2021
2022

Scratches	Injured Reserve (IR)	Long Term IR (LTIR)
		Liljegren, Timothy $863,333$863,333 ($400,000$400K) RD RFA - 2
		Bocharov, Ivan $925,000$925,000

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Forums/Armchair-GM

Description

Free Agent Signings

Trades

TOR

CBJ

TOR

OTT

Buyouts

Retained Salary Transactions

Roster

Special Teams

Embed Code

Text-Embed

Question:

Options: