Quoting: aedoran
I disagree. For now Hronek, Seider and Lindstrom are just fine. Maybe he is better than Lindstrom now but I doubt he will be after Lindstrom gets a full season under his belt. Detroit also has Antti Tuomisto who is probably going to be pretty good, There was an article on the Athletic about Tuomisto and you'd think his dad that wrote it. From pervious
discussions I know you have a subscription to the Athletic. It just doesn't make sense to give up a 3rd for an RD when Detroit has a couple that are better and several with higher ceilings. It's not like Detroit is going to be a playoff team next season. So why give up a 3rd for something they don't need this instant, Especially when there is a much bigger need for centers, a left defenseman or 2 and a goalie. That's why I don't think he is worth a 3rd a least not from Detroit pov.
I wasn't arguing that Detroit needs or wants him, I was arguing Benning's market value.
Maybe Detroit isn't a good fit for a trade, but it seems to me that you're putting an awful lot of stock in non-blue chip prospects who haven't proven anything yet.
Lindstrom was 45, 0-5-5 -12 in the AHL this year, going into next season with him penciled into the starting lineup is exactly the way to remain at the bottom of the league.
Tuomisto is a 19-year-old playing in a Finnish junior league, he's several years away realistically.
Detroit needs actual NHL players filling roster spots if they want to compete in this league. I'm not saying Benning is necessarily a great fit, but using distant bells as a reason why doesn't hold water.