SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Red n Black Slugs

Created by: PubGoatHead
Team: 2020-21 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 23, 2020
Published: Jul. 24, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Admittedly, I used a Die By The Blade podcast as reference and inspiration for some of these trades. Again, was super fun to make, and listed below is some of my thought process:

Toronto may be looking for a more controllable, right handed d man option with C. Ceci and T. Barrie possibly departing. Montour has offensive upside if used correctly, and has comparisons to a Will Butcher contract (3.7). In return, Kerfoot serves as a hard-working, reliable 2C to fill the gap for when Cozens is ready to progress up the lineup.

Calgary may be looking for a right handed d man due to the possible loss of a chunk of the defensive end, as Risto can then be a nice depth option behind Gio and Hanifin. I believe Risto can still be relevant, and can be quite effective if his minutes are managed correctly. He needs a change of scenery, and Calgary could be a nice fit for him. Asplund can be a nice middle or bottom 6 counterpart to a line combo. The question here is Bennett, as I'm under the impression Calgary fans are split on him. Some consider him a bust, and others love how he's transitioned his game to a more gritty/high energy style (as I do). The 3rd round pick is conditional, and would essentially just be swapping goalies, with the Sabres retaining some of Hutton's salary. Calgary fans, feel free to voice how you feel about Bennett, and possibly A. Mangipane because he would be my other option.

Lastly, the Sabres still own Pilut's rights, and I personally think the dude should be playing in the NHL and not in Russia. To give him a fresh start, Carolina can be a low key fun market for him, and possibly be a cost controllable, right handed, immediate part of that defense with J. Edmundson potentially out the door. The Sabres get a nice left handed defensive prospect who is close in comparison to Pilut on d man prospect rankings.

Offense:
Protecting the core of Eichel-Reinhart-Skinner-Olofsson is key. Kerfoot as 2C with M.Johansson and J.Skinner flanking, as they showed some nice chemistry last season. Cozens as 3C, but being protected by a fast, high energy Bennett who will stand up to any **** thrown Cozens' way, and Kahun as a very solid two-way counterpart. Then a highly effective shut down 4th line, with Lazar's spot being prone to substitution with Thompson being my first in line call-up. The ethos of the group is to be a nice mix of talented, defensively confident, high energy, relentless dogs after the puck; just the kind of lunch pail collection of guys the people of Buffalo can cheer for.

Defense:
DeMelo signs as a UFA if he can be wrestled away from the Jets, and TVR being signed to serve as a vet shut down 7th defensemen. Bryson's spot is prone to call-ups and downs for prospect competition. McCabe needs to be paired with Jokiharju for his lapses in defensive focus from time to time. Miller has an under appreciated slapshot, and Dalhin is Dalhin.

Goalies:
Talbot had a nice resurgence in Calgary, but Rittich likely has the foothold of starter there. Calgary has a clear 1-2 of Rittich and Hutton, while the Sabres split the tandem of Ullmark and Talbot like BOS and ARI does. At least until UPL is ready to move up with Ullmark in a couple years.

Hopes and dreams to be crushed t-minus 3...2....1.....
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,900,000
4$4,500,000
3$2,300,000
2$2,900,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
1$875,000
1$800,000
1$875,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
4$3,200,000
3$3,000,000
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
BUF
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
Conditional 3rd round pick if Risto plays in 50% of the games and the Flames make the postseason in 2020-21.

Talbot comes over as pending UFA.
CGY
  1. Asplund, Rasmus
  2. Hutton, Carter
  3. Ristolainen, Rasmus
Additional Details:
1,000,000 retained on Hutton salary
3.
CAR
  1. Pilut, Lawrence [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$74,637,500$1,487,500$4,337,500$6,862,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,900,000$6,900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,900,000$2,900,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$900,000$900,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,200,000$3,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$889,166$889,166
LD/RD
RFA - 2
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,300,000$2,300,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
RD
RFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA - 3
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 24, 2020 at 12:06 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 443
Leafs might agree to that deal.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 12:11 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,324
Likes: 7,160
Eichel and Skinner both play their best hockey together. I wouldn't split them up.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 12:12 a.m.
#3
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,996
Likes: 3,305
Not nearly enough value for Risto. No deal. No point in trading for Bean if we don't play him in the NHL and no chance Carolina even makes that trade. Bean >> Pilut
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 12:24 a.m.
#4
Meh
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 848
Likes: 239
I don't see any reason why Toronto should want Montour. He is small, poor defensively, and most likely to again be an over-paid RHD on his next contract, who brings elements to the team that they are already over-flowing with, and brings nothing except further weakness for the areas where Toronto is already weak. Surely there are many other teams out there who could actually benefit from a D like Montour.

I could be wrong. After all Dubas built a bad, unbalanced, poor-defensively, soft D-core this year and it showed. Everyone who watches them should know that they are more in need of Muzzin-types than Barrie-types. But maybe he will double down on his direction. However, as there is no evidence that Dubas was interested in Montour a little over a year ago (especially as Toronto and Anaheim have had a good relationship trade-wise), I am hoping that he is still not interested.
oneX liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 6:21 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 982
You're undervaluing both montour and risto.
Team is largely the same maybe slightly better but that second line sucks. And the 3rs isnt much better. If you're trading both risto and montour I would imagine you get at least one player that makes the offense better. Bennett and kerfoot do not.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 9:22 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 639
Trade 1: Not my favorite trade option for a center, but I wouldn't be upset at the trade.

Trade 2: We're getting absolutely fleeced by Calgary.

Trade 3: No clue why Carolina would do that trade
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jul. 24, 2020 at 10:03 a.m.
#7
look good play good
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 426
Likes: 98
Cgy doesnt want Risto, again for the 400th time its been leaked by CGY management group that Risto was outed by amateur scouts around the time of the draft saying he doesnt fit the flames game plan/environment.

He will never be a flame.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll