Boqvist isn’t a prospect anymore. I would argue that neither is Dobson (even though he isn’t quite a regular either)
I would replace their spots with Perunovich and Söderström. Also replace broberg with Bouchard. If u are willing to add more, I would say Samberg (probably my bias), timmins, Broberg, merkley, and lundqvist and should all be added
Nils Lundkvist
Victor Söderström
biased Egor Zamula
Quoting: arafay
Boqvist isn’t a prospect anymore. I would argue that neither is Dobson (even though he isn’t quite a regular either)
I would replace their spots with Perunovich and Söderström. Also replace broberg with Bouchard. If u are willing to add more, I would say Samberg (probably my bias), timmins, Broberg, merkley, and lundqvist and should all be added
Agree on Soderstrom Lundkvist Perunovich
Disagree on Zamula ( even if he had a good tournament WCJ-20 )
Maybe Boston prospect Vakaarainen ( not sure how to write it )
Mb, sorry for the impatience! I was confused why u had Samberg and lunquvist as new players but then I remembered their deals don’t start until next year
Educate yourself on both. Fehevary is very good. Looked better than a lot of guys on your list that have already played a short amount in the NHL.
Alexeyev for sure, but I don’t see fehevary as being a better prospect. Sure, he is more nhl ready right now and all, but I think overall, the guys listed here are better prospects
Alexeyev for sure, but I don’t see fehevary as being a better prospect. Sure, he is more nhl ready right now and all, but I think overall, the guys listed here are better prospects
I mean you can argue ceilings all you want but he can play in the NHL right now. Hard to ignore a guy who’s more NHL ready. Isn’t that the ultimate goal. Took Gudas spot on the current roster. People don’t know him bc he’s a 2nd round pick and not a house hold name yet.
Educate yourself on both. Fehevary is very good. Looked better than a lot of guys on your list that have already played a short amount in the NHL.
Quoting: arafay
Alexeyev for sure, but I don’t see fehevary as being a better prospect. Sure, he is more nhl ready right now and all, but I think overall, the guys listed here are better prospects
Almost all those prospects have top2-3 potential, tell me honestly you think Fehevary have top2-3 potential
I mean you can argue ceilings all you want but he can play in the NHL right now. Hard to ignore a guy who’s more NHL ready. Isn’t that the ultimate goal. Took Gudas spot on the current roster. People don’t know him bc he’s a 2nd round pick and not a house hold name yet.
I’m going with the prospect with the highest ceiling
Fehevary Timmins Merkley Vakaarainen York etc aren’t there because I think they don’t have the same potential
Almost all those prospects have top2-3 potential, tell me honestly you think Fehevary have top2-3 potential
Absolutely! They had him paired with Carlson already this year and he looked great. You’re talking about “potential” this dude has already done it. Today he took Gudas spot played 15 minutes looked great. He’s only going to get better. Don’t be surprised when he’s in Washington’s top 4 in a year or 2.
I’m going with the prospect with the highest ceiling
Fehevary Timmins Merkley Vakaarainen York etc aren’t there because I think they don’t have the same potential
Idk it’s hard to ignore how well he’s done when called upon. He’s like a better defensive ORLOV imo.(not as good at zone entries of offensively) We’ll see. It’s a list of great prospects wouldn’t kill you to add a guy like him who’s shown he’s at least able to play in the NHL Guys like Marino are complete unknowns. Fehevary isn’t the same type as Mario but my point is all the same.
Edit:
Hugo Has is another capital d prospect I think is going to be amazing. He’s not signed yet idt but he’s solid
Absolutely! They had him paired with Carlson already this year and he looked great. You’re talking about “potential” this dude has already done it. Today he took Gudas spot played 15 minutes looked great. He’s only going to get better. Don’t be surprised when he’s in Washington’s top 4 in a year or 2.
Victor Mete played with Weber at 19-20 yo top pairing and looked good. He’s still a #5 with top4 potential but he is far from having top pairing potential. Not because you looked good playing with an Elite player makes your ceiling go higher. Nothing against Fehevary, in my book he has more top4 potential than top pairing potential
Victor Mete played with Weber at 19-20 yo top pairing and looked good. He’s still a #5 with top4 potential but he is far from having top pairing potential. Not because you looked good playing with an Elite player makes your ceiling go higher. Nothing against Fehevary, in my book he has more top4 potential than top pairing potential
Eh little different. Weber is good In both end Carlson is .... he’s really good at offense. He is below average at defense. Either way I understand your point.
he's a great athlete, but just isn't good when going against other guys that he can't just skate around, in the SHL he was a turnover machine and struggled to get the puck out of his own zone (badly), especially under pressure he really struggled, also is not a very good positional guy, and when you put all that together you get a guy who struggles defensively, and isn't good enough offensively to anchor your best puck moving DFD with to help him get out of his own end, but that's probably why he impressed during the TC practices bc he took advantage of his physical gifts while nobody else was at 100%, then got absolutely caved in during the exhibition game thing, like seriously couldn't get a puck out of his own end (sorry for rambling, I'm not really good at explaining stuff lol)