SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres 2020-2021

Created by: BleedingEdge
Team: 2020-21 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 20, 2020
Published: Aug. 20, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,500,000
5$7,000,000
2$2,250,000
1$950,000
2$2,750,000
1$800,000
1$950,000
3$3,200,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,300,000
3$1,800,000
1$1,000,000
4$6,250,000
Trades
1.
2.
DET
  1. Okposo, Kyle
  2. 2021 1st round pick (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. Anderson, Josh [RFA Rights]
CBJ
  1. Montour, Brandon [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$78,354,167$1,487,500$3,487,500$3,145,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:14 p.m.
#1
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3,418
Question on that Jackets trade: why? What motivation do you imagine us having for making that move?
Advance warning: "getting something for Anderson" is not a valid motivation nor has it ever been one.
dzmets liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:15 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 641
That Okposo contract is 3 years long. Unless he can be sent to Robidas Island he will likely require more than a future 1st in a weak draft to pass off on another team.
buffbry and aedoran liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:16 p.m.
#3
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,989
Likes: 5,390
Gonna take this year's first and either Ryan Johnson or Matias Samuelson for us to take okposo contract
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:18 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 22
Likes: 1
Quoting: Viqsi
Question on that Jackets trade: why? What motivation do you imagine us having for making that move?
Advance warning: "getting something for Anderson" is not a valid motivation nor has it ever been one.


Sorry I made a mistake, the trade was supposed to be Eichel for Anderson
JimmyV1993 liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:29 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Seider53
That Okposo contract is 3 years long. Unless he can be sent to Robidas Island he will likely require more than a future 1st in a weak draft to pass off on another team.


Quoting: buffbry
Gonna take this year's first and either Ryan Johnson or Matias Samuelson for us to take okposo contract


2021 first for OK posts contract is fair. Let's be honest Detroit will not be spending to the cap the next 3 years so this foes not hinder them in that regard. Honestly I think the Sabres are more likely to just ride out the contract rather than give up a significant asset to unload this player. He is still a good bottom 6 player that provides leadership and production. Obviously not 6 million worth but still is not a player that shouldn't be in a NHL lineup
BleedingEdge and aedoran liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:31 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Viqsi
Question on that Jackets trade: why? What motivation do you imagine us having for making that move?
Advance warning: "getting something for Anderson" is not a valid motivation nor has it ever been one.


Quoting: BleedingEdge
Sorry I made a mistake, the trade was supposed to be Eichel for Anderson


agreed the trade is not a good fit for cbj as they don't NEED RHD, but the value is definitely fair
Ajp_18 liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:33 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 641
Quoting: dzmets
2021 first for OK posts contract is fair. Let's be honest Detroit will not be spending to the cap the next 3 years so this foes not hinder them in that regard. Honestly I think the Sabres are more likely to just ride out the contract rather than give up a significant asset to unload this player. He is still a good bottom 6 player that provides leadership and production. Obviously not 6 million worth but still is not a player that shouldn't be in a NHL lineup


Right, but the sabres can't afford to ride him out, the cap is flat.
Detroit will comfortably be able to make the cap floor because teams will NEED to get rid of roster players on overinflated contracts, and will pay to do so. Not only will the actual salary cap be flat, but not every team will be spending to it, cap is a finite resource and as such has value. Okposo's contract is 3x longer than Marleau's. Marleau required a 1st. That is a rough precident, I'm not saying that a 3 year contract requires 3 1sts, but it certainly should require more than just 1, there should be other picks, prospects or actually valuable roster players.
aedoran and JimmyV1993 liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:33 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
I think it will take a lot more to get RNH. Probably 8 o/a in addition to Risto and Montour. That is if Edmonton will consider moving this player. That being said I would still make that deal. He is exactly the player the Sabres need
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:41 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Seider53
Right, but the sabres can't afford to ride him out, the cap is flat.
Detroit will comfortably be able to make the cap floor because teams will NEED to get rid of roster players on overinflated contracts, and will pay to do so. Not only will the actual salary cap be flat, but not every team will be spending to it, cap is a finite resource and as such has value. Okposo's contract is 3x longer than Marleau's. Marleau required a 1st. That is a rough precident, I'm not saying that a 3 year contract requires 3 1sts, but it certainly should require more than just 1, there should be other picks, prospects or actually valuable roster players.


Sure the Sabres can ride him out. They will be among the teams not spending to the cap. Okposo only has 13 million remaining on his contract so that is 4.33 per year. He is worth 3 million per so only a slight overpay on the dollars being sent out. Not worth jeopardizing your future team and revenues for minimal savings now.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:44 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Seider53
Right, but the sabres can't afford to ride him out, the cap is flat.
Detroit will comfortably be able to make the cap floor because teams will NEED to get rid of roster players on overinflated contracts, and will pay to do so. Not only will the actual salary cap be flat, but not every team will be spending to it, cap is a finite resource and as such has value. Okposo's contract is 3x longer than Marleau's. Marleau required a 1st. That is a rough precident, I'm not saying that a 3 year contract requires 3 1sts, but it certainly should require more than just 1, there should be other picks, prospects or actually valuable roster players.


Additionally he is only to be paid 2.4 million by the Sabres this year so they at least keep him 1 more year and then if they decide to spend close to the cap next year they move him then and maybe retain some salary
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:46 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 8,072
Likes: 4,256
This is a joke right? Nuge for Ristolainen... come on. Ristolainens value is so small compared to Nuge’s. Nuge is a good top 6 forward, and Ristolainen is a not so good defence man, that only knows how to play offence. That’s not even close to fair value. It would probably have to start with Olofsson.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 5:53 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 641
Quoting: dzmets
Sure the Sabres can ride him out. They will be among the teams not spending to the cap. Okposo only has 13 million remaining on his contract so that is 4.33 per year. He is worth 3 million per so only a slight overpay on the dollars being sent out. Not worth jeopardizing your future team and revenues for minimal savings now.


Ok, so with the 34.5 million dollars of cap space the sabers have left they need to sign a minimum of: 1 top line forward, 2 second line forwards, 5 bottom 6 forwards 1 top 4 defenceman and a starting goalie.

Reinhart eats up 6-7 of that comfortably, and completes the top line. Olofsson should be between 4-5 more and an average 2C earns between 5 and 6 million.
Those three players already eat up just under half of your spare cap dollars. That leaves you roughly $17m to sign 5 of your bottom 6, a minimum of 1 D and a goalie. That is highly unlikely, and if you only take the affordable options, Buffalo will remain in or around the basement.
buffbry and aedoran liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:03 p.m.
#13
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,989
Likes: 5,390
Quoting: dzmets
2021 first for OK posts contract is fair. Let's be honest Detroit will not be spending to the cap the next 3 years so this foes not hinder them in that regard. Honestly I think the Sabres are more likely to just ride out the contract rather than give up a significant asset to unload this player. He is still a good bottom 6 player that provides leadership and production. Obviously not 6 million worth but still is not a player that shouldn't be in a NHL lineup


Just because the wings have the cap space doesn't mean they are gonna help out a division rival, it's this year's pick and one of the 2 prospects I named or you can keep his contract for 3 years
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:15 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Seider53
Ok, so with the 34.5 million dollars of cap space the sabers have left they need to sign a minimum of: 1 top line forward, 2 second line forwards, 5 bottom 6 forwards 1 top 4 defenceman and a starting goalie.

Reinhart eats up 6-7 of that comfortably, and completes the top line. Olofsson should be between 4-5 more and an average 2C earns between 5 and 6 million.
Those three players already eat up just under half of your spare cap dollars. That leaves you roughly $17m to sign 5 of your bottom 6, a minimum of 1 D and a goalie. That is highly unlikely, and if you only take the affordable options, Buffalo will remain in or around the basement.


Ulmark is our starting goalie ranked around middle of the league last year and has improved every year so no need to add there. We already have 5 of our bottom 6 in Cozens, Kahun, Johansson, Lazar, Okposo. That only adds about 3.5 per for resigning Kahun and Lazar. We can spend 1- 2 on a good fourth line player for the 6th spot. We have 5 of our top 6 D on the books already and at least one maybe 2 top 6 d salary that will be moved out to make room for another player on the left side or if Bryson is ready then we put him in the bottom pair. Top 4 Jokiharju/Dahlin, McCabe/Risto or Montour.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:16 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: buffbry
Just because the wings have the cap space doesn't mean they are gonna help out a division rival, it's this year's pick and one of the 2 prospects I named or you can keep his contract for 3 years


we can keep it in is not that big of a deal. It make really no sense to move until after this year anyhow as he is only owed 3 million with 20% escrow that is only 2.4 dollars paid out and we will not be against the cap
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:19 p.m.
#16
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,989
Likes: 5,390
Quoting: dzmets
we can keep it in is not that big of a deal. It make really no sense to move until after this year anyhow as he is only owed 3 million with 20% escrow that is only 2.4 dollars paid out and we will not be against the cap


It's about cap space not money owed
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:23 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: buffbry
It's about cap space not money owed


Sabres will be nowhere near the cap so it is not an issue. They will be operating on an internal cap based on dollars spent
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:24 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 641
Quoting: dzmets
Ulmark is our starting goalie ranked around middle of the league last year and has improved every year so no need to add there. We already have 5 of our bottom 6 in Cozens, Kahun, Johansson, Lazar, Okposo. That only adds about 3.5 per for resigning Kahun and Lazar. We can spend 1- 2 on a good fourth line player for the 6th spot. We have 5 of our top 6 D on the books already and at least one maybe 2 top 6 d salary that will be moved out to make room for another player on the left side or if Bryson is ready then we put him in the bottom pair. Top 4 Jokiharju/Dahlin, McCabe/Risto or Montour.


Fair play to the Sabres if they can make that work. If I was management I would not be looking at that as a roster that can just continue on from last year and expect success. Sorry bud.
aedoran liked this.
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:32 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,053
Quoting: Seider53
Fair play to the Sabres if they can make that work. If I was management I would not be looking at that as a roster that can just continue on from last year and expect success. Sorry bud.


The Sabres will get better the same way other teams do. Drafting and developing and making good trades. Spending a bunch of UFA dollars is not going to improve this team. They are bringing the highest rated affiliated prospect in hockey into the lineup this year and their entire core is still young with varying room for growth. If they take a good step forward collectively in their development they will be good if not they won't. It is the same path forward the Wings have. If their young players do not make significant strides year over year in their development then they will remain where they are now also
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:50 p.m.
#20
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,995
Likes: 3,305
We gotta add more to get RNH, if he signs a 7 year, 6-7 mil per contract I'd be willing to give Risto, 2021 1st (top 5 protected), and a prospect like TT
Aug. 20, 2020 at 6:53 p.m.
#21
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 2,180
Quoting: BleedingEdge
Sorry I made a mistake, the trade was supposed to be Eichel for Anderson


Just because anderson isn't worth eichel means he's worth Montour?
Aug. 21, 2020 at 9:13 a.m.
#22
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3,418
Quoting: BleedingEdge
Sorry I made a mistake, the trade was supposed to be Eichel for Anderson

Only if you also take back a bunch of cap dumps we don't actually have and **** it can't keep a straight face.

I'm not claiming it's a ripoff; it's that we have zero need for defensemen, and yet the Andy bounceback gamble is valuable to us. It's a fair attempt but it makes zero sense whatsoever for the Jackets.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll