SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kevyn Szn

Team: 2020-21 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 9, 2020
Published: Sep. 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,750,000
1$800,000
1$1,000,000
2$3,500,000
6$5,000,000
6$6,500,000
1$1,000,000
3$2,750,000
6$6,000,000
4$3,400,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Cirelli, Anthony [RFA Rights]
TBL
  1. 2020 1st round pick (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (ANA)
  2. 2022 5th round pick (ANA)
3.
CAR
  1. 2020 5th round pick (BUF)
4.
BUF
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]
COL
  1. 2020 4th round pick (BUF)
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (ANA)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,707,500$1,487,500$4,337,500$792,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$845,000$845,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,125,000$3,125,000
G
UFA - 1
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$864,166$864,166
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 9, 2020 at 6:58 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,795
Likes: 19,853
Cirelli is not being moved for futures
JTBF81 liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:31 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 5,976
Make that 2nd a lower pick if the Ducks are taking Hutton as well, probably even without Hutton. Millers value has gone down since BUF traded for him
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:33 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,704
Likes: 6,788
Quoting: Salzy
Make that 2nd a lower pick if the Ducks are taking Hutton as well, probably even without Hutton. Millers value has gone down since BUF traded for him


OldNYIfan was okay with it? I think anything less we'd just keep him and try to rise his value
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:35 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 5,976
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
OldNYIfan was okay with it? I think anything less we'd just keep him and try to rise his value


Which at that point is fair, I just dont see how Miller helps the Ducks more than a possible early second at this point. And I see Hutton as a cap dump personally, Anthony Stolarz was great in the AHL and is making league min, cant see him being bad enough to justify Hutton, worst case we go sign Domingue/Brossoit or whoever for half of Huttons AAV
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:37 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,704
Likes: 6,788
Quoting: Salzy
Which at that point is fair, I just dont see how Miller helps the Ducks more than a possible early second at this point. And I see Hutton as a cap dump personally, Anthony Stolarz was great in the AHL and is making league min, cant see him being bad enough to justify Hutton, worst case we go sign Domingue/Brossoit or whoever for half of Huttons AAV


Gotcha. Would you do it without Hutton?
Lenny7 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:40 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,000
Likes: 14,633
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Cirelli is not being moved for futures


If he is moved it will have to be for futures as they cannot take on a penny in cap.

Maybe he isnt available, but if he is, this would be an excellent return
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:41 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 5,976
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Gotcha. Would you do it without Hutton?


I would say no right now, I'm a big fan of Miller but I would hold off on ANA and see if they add anything else in trade or FA. This is a big off-season for ANA as they could fully commit to a rebuild. If they do I would 100% be against trading that much for Miller, though I definitely see at least one team being willing to pay that price
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:44 a.m.
#8
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Gotcha. Would you do it without Hutton?


I would. Hutton is pretty rotten, and would just suck away the last bit of cap space on the team. I'm quite content rolling with Gibby and Stolarz to start the season.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 7:46 a.m.
#9
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: Salzy
I would say no right now, I'm a big fan of Miller but I would hold off on ANA and see if they add anything else in trade or FA. This is a big off-season for ANA as they could fully commit to a rebuild. If they do I would 100% be against trading that much for Miller, though I definitely see at least one team being willing to pay that price


I don't think there's going to be a full commitment at any point that Gibby is on the team. Add a piece or two, see where you're at when you get to the deadline. I don't see Murray doing anything earth shattering. Plus, that draft is terrifying.
Salzy liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 8:29 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 745
Likes: 238
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Cirelli is not being moved for futures


I feel like thats the only think they'd want for him. What are you thinking ? They cant afford a star D-Man, unless they shed alot of a salary. But Cirelli is due for a huge pay day
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 10:02 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,795
Likes: 19,853
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If he is moved it will have to be for futures as they cannot take on a penny in cap.

Maybe he isnt available, but if he is, this would be an excellent return


It would be a good return, but that doesnt make him any more available. Sergachev can get almost an identical return and is more available due to defense being harder to protect in expansion. Tampa is in a "win now" mentality so selling the young core pieces for scratch tickets os counterintuitive.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 10:13 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,795
Likes: 19,853
Quoting: kedogs00
I feel like thats the only think they'd want for him. What are you thinking ? They cant afford a star D-Man, unless they shed alot of a salary. But Cirelli is due for a huge pay day


Cirelli paced ~19 goals and 53 points this year. Last year Point had 41g, 92p and got 6.75M x 3yr. Point is the better 2-way player as well in both this year and last. I cant imagine a difference in 40 points demands anything less than a 2M difference in pay. So anything over 4.75M is a massive overpayment.

As for Sergachev, he doesn't have a lot of ground to bargain. He's not better than McAvoy or Werenski so he shouldn't get more than 4.9M. My guess is a similar number to Klingberg in Dallas.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 10:48 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 745
Likes: 238
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Cirelli paced ~19 goals and 53 points this year. Last year Point had 41g, 92p and got 6.75M x 3yr. Point is the better 2-way player as well in both this year and last. I cant imagine a difference in 40 points demands anything less than a 2M difference in pay. So anything over 4.75M is a massive overpayment.

As for Sergachev, he doesn't have a lot of ground to bargain. He's not better than McAvoy or Werenski so he shouldn't get more than 4.9M. My guess is a similar number to Klingberg in Dallas.


Unless they wanna provide a home town discount they are both going to get more. They both should be offer sheeted if thats the case. Cirelli is young and getting better each year, As a BUF fan, I'd offer a 1st and 4th or offer sheet him 5 years at 5.5 a year.

Sergachev I feel will get similar if not more.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.
#14
GO BOLTS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 388
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Cirelli paced ~19 goals and 53 points this year. Last year Point had 41g, 92p and got 6.75M x 3yr. Point is the better 2-way player as well in both this year and last. I cant imagine a difference in 40 points demands anything less than a 2M difference in pay. So anything over 4.75M is a massive overpayment.

As for Sergachev, he doesn't have a lot of ground to bargain. He's not better than McAvoy or Werenski so he shouldn't get more than 4.9M. My guess is a similar number to Klingberg in Dallas.


You make perfect sense, coming from a TB fan. Serg has grown considerably. He is not McAvoy but has the chance of being better than him in 2 years. I watched Hedman grow up and if you compare the 2 at the same period time Serge is better (but he is on a much better team) . I am not saying he will be better than Hedman, almost impossible just he can grow considerably. Cirelli is great defensively but he needs to finish scoring better. Most of his goals comes from just driving the net. I would not hand him a 6 million dollar contract this year.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
#15
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,808
Likes: 25,634
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Cirelli is not being moved for futures


Why do you think not? It would seem to solve their cap problems.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 2:27 p.m.
#16
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,808
Likes: 25,634
I still think a 2021 second for Colin Miller is a reasonable idea. I think that every incremental step we can take towards getting better is positive, even if it means getting the 10th or 15th or 20th pick next year instead of the 5th.

As my esteemed colleagues have established, Hutton is not merely unnecessary but actively unwanted.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 2:54 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 566
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Cirelli is not being moved for futures


Agreed, if Tampa even entertained the idea of trading Cirelli, then it would have to be for a good, nhl ready etc type. Tampa, as you said, is in “win now” mentality and just traded the equivalent of 3 1st round picks for added depth. They aren’t looking to move the young core for lottery tickets. Most on here don’t seem to get that though. I think Cirelli comes in around 4 and Serg no more than 4.5. Neither player seems interested in leaving and have already indicated they are open to working with the team on the contract. Unless Tampa is blown away by an offer for one of them, they are staying. From Buffalo, the offer would likely have to start with Jokiharju or Cozens for Tampa to seriously consider it.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:09 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 566
Quoting: kedogs00
Unless they wanna provide a home town discount they are both going to get more. They both should be offer sheeted if thats the case. Cirelli is young and getting better each year, As a BUF fan, I'd offer a 1st and 4th or offer sheet him 5 years at 5.5 a year.

Sergachev I feel will get similar if not more.


Pretty much zero chance Cirelli would sign an OS to Buffalo, and at 5 years, 5.5, Tampa quickly matches. Tampa rfas have a history of taking less than some others to keep the team together, not to mention the location, great organization and yes, the tax advantages that are available in Tampa. Serg will come in around 4.5(He’s definitely not getting more than McAvoy or Werenski, and with the flat cap and Tampa guys taking less...) and Cirelli around 4 or just above. Tampa doesn’t massively overpayguys right off an elc, it’s not how their organization works. If either Serg or Cirelli only care about max dollars right now and want to take a very inflated OS to go play for a non contender, that’s their choice, but it seems far more likely that they will stay with a top 3-5 contender while still getting a sizable raise. They’ll bet on themselves only getting better in that time and then getting a very good 8 year deal after the bridge, which based on their play now, seems likely. Both guys and their agents know how Tampa handles their contracts, and nothing from either seems to indicate they will be the first to rock the boat.

That being said, Tampa isn’t trading him for the 8th pick, who may help Tampa 3 years from now(2 being generous). Tampa is in a balancing act where they are definitely looking to “win now” while not shredding the future core in the process. Players like Cirelli and Serg are part of that core so moving them is going to require an offer that really wows Brisebois. The 8th pick isn’t it. If Buffalo really wants Cirelli, the offer needs to start with either Jokiharju or Cozens to keep Brisebois interested.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll