SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary would you do this

Created by: Bruinsdiehard
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 10, 2020
Published: Sep. 10, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Assuming a team like Calgary signs Hall for an absurd 8M+/year contract, maybe they would be extra motivated to move on from Johnny Gaudreau.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,400,000
2$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
8$5,250,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (CGY)
Additional Details:
Draft pick is 2020 not 2021
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
  2. Moore, John
  3. 2021 5th round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Draft pick is 2020 not 2021
2.
BOS
  1. Anderson, Josh [RFA Rights]
CBJ
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (BOS)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Draft pick is 2020 not 2021
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$80,505,889$964,222$1,250,000$994,111
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:36 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 932
Likes: 320
How is Calgary giving the better player and the higher pick?
Thielraven and KINGS67 liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:37 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Columbus has no interest in adding yet another bottom-6 wing in Nick Ritchie, and given the reports from Dreger that Anderson is interested in re-signing long-term in Columbus, I could see a 5x4 deal being enough to keep him around at a reasonable hit. Pass.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:38 p.m.
#3
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,599
Likes: 8,270
Take moore and give a 2nd, no they dont do that
Thielraven liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:41 p.m.
#4
MK458
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 931
Value is a little off in my opinion. The Bruins need to be giving up the 2nd rounder, not Calgary
bhavikp27 liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:44 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,334
Likes: 19,564
When did Gaudreau become a cap dump? Isn't it too early to be drinking? No chance Calgary considers this troll offer

Heres my counter
Dube, Lucic and a 5th for Bergeron and a 2nd
Alfie11, mhockey91, Thielraven and 1 other person liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:45 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 10
Quoting: benjgc
Columbus has no interest in adding yet another bottom-6 wing in Nick Ritchie, and given the reports from Dreger that Anderson is interested in re-signing long-term in Columbus, I could see a 5x4 deal being enough to keep him around at a reasonable hit. Pass.


And they how does Columbus keep Pierre Luc Dubois if they sign Anderson to that?
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:46 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Horrible for Calgary
Thielraven and Connys_Cucks liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:48 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 140
I’m a bruins fan. It would be more realistic to say Debrusk and a 2nd for Gaudreau.
Bruinsdiehard liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:50 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
And they how does Columbus keep Pierre Luc Dubois if they sign Anderson to that?


Glad you asked! Here's my recent ACGM answering that. Short version: trade Jenner, Murray and Harrington, and buy out Wennberg.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:54 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 10
Quoting: benjgc
Glad you asked! Here's my recent ACGM answering that. Short version: trade Jenner, Murray and Harrington, and buy out Wennberg.


I don’t see Columbus doing any of that in real life, but that’s why these boards are fun.

Also, I’d 100% change the term on your hypothetical for Anderson. Why would we want to become a UFA at 30 years old? He’s either going to sign a 1-2 year deal or a very long term deal (7-8 years)
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:57 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
I don’t see Columbus doing any of that in real life, but that’s why these boards are fun.

Also, I’d 100% change the term on your hypothetical for Anderson. Why would we want to become a UFA at 30 years old? He’s either going to sign a 1-2 year deal or a very long term deal (7-8 years)


They're absolutely gonna move at least one D this offseason, and possibly more. Priority is to add scoring talent up front. Not sure the Domi idea happens, but Jarmo knows a 2C is the goal. And I don't see Andy getting 6 or more from anybody, so a 4- or 5-year deal seems his most likely option.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:58 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Why would Calgary do that? Johnny is better than Debrusk lol

Bruins Laugh at that Columbus deal, Andersson is worth nothing rn

That Krug deal is hilarious

This is a mess
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:58 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 10
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
When did Gaudreau become a cap dump? Isn't it too early to be drinking? No chance Calgary considers this troll offer

Heres my counter
Dube, Lucic and a 5th for Bergeron and a 2nd


Like I said in the caption for this roster, this assumes Calgary signs Taylor Hall and are looking to move on from Gaudreau (which has been widely reported anyways, but who knows). As for the trade, Calgary is getting value in a cost controlled LD in John Moore, and Jake Debrusk is 5 years younger than Gaudreau. The picks I guess could be changed around if Calgary was willing to retain a slight amount of Gaudreau’s contract, but that’s ultimately dressing on the deal. The heart of it is Debrusk and Moore for Gaudreau.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 3:59 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: KMMHL2012
How is Calgary giving the better player and the higher pick?


Quoting: benjgc
Columbus has no interest in adding yet another bottom-6 wing in Nick Ritchie, and given the reports from Dreger that Anderson is interested in re-signing long-term in Columbus, I could see a 5x4 deal being enough to keep him around at a reasonable hit. Pass.


Quoting: Jfstompers
Take moore and give a 2nd, no they dont do that


Quoting: mk458
Value is a little off in my opinion. The Bruins need to be giving up the 2nd rounder, not Calgary


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
When did Gaudreau become a cap dump? Isn't it too early to be drinking? No chance Calgary considers this troll offer

Heres my counter
Dube, Lucic and a 5th for Bergeron and a 2nd


Quoting: flamesfan
Horrible for Calgary


Quoting: l19f9
I’m a bruins fan. It would be more realistic to say Debrusk and a 2nd for Gaudreau.


Yall dont worry, this guy DOES NOT speak for the bruins
This trade clearly favors the bruins by a mile lol

The Colombus one is QUICKLY decline by the bruins cuz andersson is hardly worth a 4th rn so we dont want that either
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:05 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,334
Likes: 19,564
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
Like I said in the caption for this roster, this assumes Calgary signs Taylor Hall and are looking to move on from Gaudreau (which has been widely reported anyways, but who knows). As for the trade, Calgary is getting value in a cost controlled LD in John Moore, and Jake Debrusk is 5 years younger than Gaudreau. The picks I guess could be changed around if Calgary was willing to retain a slight amount of Gaudreau’s contract, but that’s ultimately dressing on the deal. The heart of it is Debrusk and Moore for Gaudreau.


Lmao what?
1. Moore is far from cost controlled. He eould be paid almost 3 million to play in the minors. Flames have 4 maybe 5 better LD than him.
2. DeBrusk is 3 years younger than Gaudreau not 5. DeBrusk is a middle 6 player that might not even make Calgary's 2nd line.
3. Flames retain on Gaudreau?!?! God you are funny. Have you tried stand up?

The fact that you think this offer is even remotely close to fair shows how much of a homer you are.
Connys_Cucks liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:05 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 10
Quoting: benjgc
They're absolutely gonna move at least one D this offseason, and possibly more. Priority is to add scoring talent up front. Not sure the Domi idea happens, but Jarmo knows a 2C is the goal. And I don't see Andy getting 6 or more from anybody, so a 4- or 5-year deal seems his most likely option.


Ok, well I’m not gonna argue with all those moves you suggested (although the Wennberg buyout is truly outrageous...almost no team has ever bought out a guy with 3 years left on his contract since the last lockout) since that’s your purview as a Blue Jackets fan, but I will say the Anderson thing I feel is just flat out wrong. I agree that nobody would want to give him a long term contract given his injury history, so that’s exactly why a short term deal would be in everyone’s best interest. He can prove he has healed and that is 20+ goal season wasn’t a fluke, and then sign a longer term deal when he’s 27 or 28. The only way he takes a 4-5 deal is if he believes his value will never be higher, which would be a scary proposition given he is coming off shoulder surgery.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:17 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 10
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lmao what?
1. Moore is far from cost controlled. He eould be paid almost 3 million to play in the minors. Flames have 4 maybe 5 better LD than him.
2. DeBrusk is 3 years younger than Gaudreau not 5. DeBrusk is a middle 6 player that might not even make Calgary's 2nd line.
3. Flames retain on Gaudreau?!?! God you are funny. Have you tried stand up?

The fact that you think this offer is even remotely close to fair shows how much of a homer you are.


Just because Moore isn’t playing regularly for the Bruins doesn’t mean he’s not a good defender. Same type of situation with how Matt Irwin was in the AHL for the Bruins and then went on to start for Nashville when they went to the Finals. Or Nick Holden who couldn’t crack the Bruins lineup but has played 60+ games for Vegas in each of the last two years. But if you think John Moore is THAT terrible, then that’s your opinion.

As for Debrusk, my apologies, I read his DOB wrong. But that being said, at 24 he still has a little time left to shape his perception in the league........unlike Gaudreau who apparently has cemented his legacy as a soft, regular season player who disappears completely in the playoffs. So before you start crapping all over what Debrusk may or may not be, you might wanna look at what Gaudreau actually is.

I get that you’re angry Calgary has once again proven themselves to be the laughingstock of “competitive” teams, but you might wanna take a breath there buddy
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:23 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
Dude, you’re the idiot out of the two of us if you think Anderson is hardly worth a 4th round pick. Did you not watch him play against the Bruins in their series against Columbus 2 years ago? Or did you only become a fan last year?


How many points did he have this year?
Please dont call someone else an idiot when you are not even close to right
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:26 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 10
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
How many points did he have this year?
Please dont call someone else an idiot when you are not even close to right


Lol oh my god he was injured dude. Injured. Lmao

Just go away
benjgc liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:26 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,334
Likes: 19,564
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
Just because Moore isn’t playing regularly for the Bruins doesn’t mean he’s not a good defender. Same type of situation with how Matt Irwin was in the AHL for the Bruins and then went on to start for Nashville when they went to the Finals. Or Nick Holden who couldn’t crack the Bruins lineup but has played 60+ games for Vegas in each of the last two years. But if you think John Moore is THAT terrible, then that’s your opinion.

As for Debrusk, my apologies, I read his DOB wrong. But that being said, at 24 he still has a little time left to shape his perception in the league........unlike Gaudreau who apparently has cemented his legacy as a soft, regular season player who disappears completely in the playoffs. So before you start crapping all over what Debrusk may or may not be, you might wanna look at what Gaudreau actually is.

I get that you’re angry Calgary has once again proven themselves to be the laughingstock of “competitive” teams, but you might wanna take a breath there buddy


If you are going to make comments at least fact check them. Gaudreau would have been 5th in scoring on the Bruins this playoffs in 3 less games. Your top 6's scoring was almost equally as invisible.

Im not angry i just know you have no idea what you are talking about. Gaudreau had the worst season of his career and was still leagues better that Jake DeBust.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:28 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
Lol oh my god he was injured dude. Injured. Lmao

Just go away


Lol cool so then Its a bad trade anyway!
Ritchie also was good the past 4 years so lets do Ritchie for Andersson 1 for 1

Or does that only matter when it benefits you!? smile
I see smile

lol bruins reject and its a bad trade!
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:29 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
Lol oh my god he was injured dude. Injured. Lmao

Just go away


I'm glad somebody outside the Columbus fanbase has an actual understanding of what Anderson is.
Bruinsdiehard liked this.
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:32 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 10
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
If you are going to make comments at least fact check them. Gaudreau would have been 5th in scoring on the Bruins this playoffs in 3 less games. Your top 6's scoring was almost equally as invisible.

Im not angry i just know you have no idea what you are talking about. Gaudreau had the worst season of his career and was still leagues better that Jake DeBust.


Hahahahaha! Wow!!! 5th?! You don’t say? How impressive! 5th!!!! Wooo!

lol looking at your profile, you’re clearly one of the countless posters on this site who just seems to thrive on calling people trolls and shouting about all the things you think are so dumb. So good for you. I’m honestly glad you root for a train wreck of a team. You’re clearly so passionate and aggressive about it so it’s fun thinking about how much Calgary will continue to suck year after year. Maybe if you shout loud enough, Brad Treliving will hear you and hire you to be his next little assistant!
Sep. 10, 2020 at 4:39 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,334
Likes: 19,564
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
Hahahahaha! Wow!!! 5th?! You don’t say? How impressive! 5th!!!! Wooo!

lol looking at your profile, you’re clearly one of the countless posters on this site who just seems to thrive on calling people trolls and shouting about all the things you think are so dumb. So good for you. I’m honestly glad you root for a train wreck of a team. You’re clearly so passionate and aggressive about it so it’s fun thinking about how much Calgary will continue to suck year after year. Maybe if you shout loud enough, Brad Treliving will hear you and hire you to be his next little assistant!


People like you is why the block option exists. Enjoy the shadow realm
Sep. 10, 2020 at 6:28 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 932
Likes: 320
Quoting: Bruinsdiehard
Just because Moore isn’t playing regularly for the Bruins doesn’t mean he’s not a good defender. Same type of situation with how Matt Irwin was in the AHL for the Bruins and then went on to start for Nashville when they went to the Finals. Or Nick Holden who couldn’t crack the Bruins lineup but has played 60+ games for Vegas in each of the last two years. But if you think John Moore is THAT terrible, then that’s your opinion.

As for Debrusk, my apologies, I read his DOB wrong. But that being said, at 24 he still has a little time left to shape his perception in the league........unlike Gaudreau who apparently has cemented his legacy as a soft, regular season player who disappears completely in the playoffs. So before you start crapping all over what Debrusk may or may not be, you might wanna look at what Gaudreau actually is.

I get that you’re angry Calgary has once again proven themselves to be the laughingstock of “competitive” teams, but you might wanna take a breath there buddy


I like how you're still defending your terrible trades, tooth and nail looking to prove your point.
nobody agrees, take the L and move on. LOL
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll