SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could This Be A Possibility

Created by: ForsbergForVezina
Team: 2020-21 New York Islanders
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 13, 2020
Published: Sep. 13, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This would be absolutely devastating but also maybe the best case scenario if we actually have to move someone from the core. Nelson would garner a lot of interest on the trade market and we'd probably be able to clear all or most of his salary. Thankfully, center depth has become a strength for this team and I think we'd survive in the long-run, although it would be definitely take a hit next season.

I'd say only do this in case of a $10 million offer sheet for Barzal. I'm still a big believer in the Boychuk dump to a team like Anaheim, Dallas or New Jersey, but you never know how that is going to work in a flat cap world.

That said, this would absolutely break my heart :(
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$6,000,000
4$4,250,000
7$10,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,300,000
2$1,250,000
Trades
1.
NYI
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (VGK)
2.
NYI
  1. 2022 6th round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. Komarov, Leo ($1,000,000 retained)
3.
NYI
  1. 2021 1st round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
What might a fair return for Nelson be and to who? Would have to be prospects/picks ideally. He's an ideal 2C, so many offensive tools. Winnipeg seems like the perfect fit.
WPG
  1. Nelson, Brock
Additional Details:
Brock has a 16 team no-trade list I believe, but you could probably work around it
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
2022
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NYI
2023
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$81,232,500$0$1,287,500$267,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Islanders
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Islanders
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$3,350,000$3,350,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Islanders
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
#1
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
I think you move bailey instead. There will be multiple teams interested - the guy is on a fair contract and is a point per game player in the playoffs
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:48 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: Isles777
I think you move bailey instead. There will be multiple teams interested - the guy is on a fair contract and is a point per game player in the playoffs


He's an option as well, although if you want to maximize your return, Nelson could be the way to go. I think we're stronger at C than on the wings too.

Neither are fun options to think about
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:50 p.m.
#3
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
He's an option as well, although if you want to maximize your return, Nelson could be the way to go. I think we're stronger at C than on the wings too.

Neither are fun options to think about


I would move cizikas or bailey instead. Nelson is so underrated and hes providing excess value on his contract right now. Also has the best shot on the team, I get that he’s get the biggest return , it’s not worth it IMO.

Half the league would be interested in cizikas
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:55 p.m.
#4
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,765
Likes: 31,479
I don't think so.

The Bjugstad trade pretty much proved that cap dump trades won't be happening in a normal way.

Teams just don't have the money to take in bigger contracts by default.

Normally Leddy might bring you a 3rd. But now I think you'll need to at least retain some salary to gain that 6th you're getting from Komarov.

And no one is taking Komarov without actually getting paid to do it...
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:57 p.m.
#5
Isles7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 12,222
Likes: 5,299
Quoting: justaBoss
I don't think so.

The Bjugstad trade pretty much proved that cap dump trades won't be happening in a normal way.

Teams just don't have the money to take in bigger contracts by default.

Normally Leddy might bring you a 3rd. But now I think you'll need to at least retain some salary to gain that 6th you're getting from Komarov.

And no one is taking Komarov without actually getting paid to do it...


You’re implying Nelson is a cap dump?
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:58 p.m.
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,765
Likes: 31,479
Quoting: Isles777
You’re implying Nelson is a cap dump?


Ofc not. It's just that teams don't have money to do moves reguralry. WPG is also long-term cap strapped.
Isles777 liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:06 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 641
Quoting: Isles777
You’re implying Nelson is a cap dump?


He certainly won't have his usual market value as a result of the current cap situation, his value isn't negative, but it has reduced as the result of the impending couple of years of cap hell.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:10 p.m.
#8
Wes6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 3
I can't see Detroit taking that. In a world where cap space is at a premium, I think they can get a much better return for $5.5 Million especially since a 29 year old defenseman wouldn't help a rebuild for when Detroit is ready to compete again.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
#9
Brock On Dudes
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 528
why the hell would the islanders do this
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:25 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 932
Likes: 320
Quoting: Chief_Kief
why the hell would the islanders do this


to keep Barzal and Pulock in the fold.

I still think Bailey would be a better option, especially if he's projected to play that low in the lineup.

Also, I don't think Toews gets that much, I think he gets a bridge at 2y 2.5M
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:49 p.m.
#11
LGI
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 439
Nelson is going nowhere Very Angry
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:07 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 457
No one is taking that Komarov deal. Unless s team gets a first and more, that gm should be fired on the spot.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:46 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Sharks have no reason to even consider this. Send Wilde or Bellows and we would consider.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:49 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: Chief_Kief
why the hell would the islanders do this


Quoting: niko
Nelson is going nowhere Very Angry


Ideally we won't and he shouldn't be. Just looking over ways we can be creative with the cap and maximize any return we get
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: TooMalevolent
No one is taking that Komarov deal. Unless s team gets a first and more, that gm should be fired on the spot.


Quoting: crankshaft
Sharks have no reason to even consider this. Send Wilde or Bellows and we would consider.


Had that one set up as a Melker Karlsson replacement for them. Most numbers I've seen actually rate him higher both offensively and defensively than Karlsson. He's been very good in the playoffs for the Isles. I think in a defensive role, he could be a really serviceable bottom-sixer. Doesn't necessarily have to be San Jose, but they've got more space than most this offseason and are pretty shallow on the wings. But anywhere we could send him for a low pick or whatever-prospect at 33% or even 50% retention works for me.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:05 p.m.
#16
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 1,888
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Had that one set up as a Melker Karlsson replacement for them. Most numbers I've seen actually rate him higher both offensively and defensively than Karlsson. He's been very good in the playoffs for the Isles. I think in a defensive role, he could be a really serviceable bottom-sixer. Doesn't necessarily have to be San Jose, but they've got more space than most this offseason and are pretty shallow on the wings. But anywhere we could send him for a low pick or whatever-prospect at 33% or even 50% retention works for me.


lol sharks don't want another Melker Karlsson.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:11 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Had that one set up as a Melker Karlsson replacement for them. Most numbers I've seen actually rate him higher both offensively and defensively than Karlsson. He's been very good in the playoffs for the Isles. I think in a defensive role, he could be a really serviceable bottom-sixer. Doesn't necessarily have to be San Jose, but they've got more space than most this offseason and are pretty shallow on the wings. But anywhere we could send him for a low pick or whatever-prospect at 33% or even 50% retention works for me.


Letting Melker walk is one of the best things Doug WIlson can do this summer. An older, more expensive Melker type is not what we need going forward. We have prospects/young guys like True and Blichfeld ready to step into that role in the bottom six with much more upside and on ELC's.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:45 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
CHI NYI
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 2,253
Quoting: Klara
lol sharks don't want another Melker Karlsson.


Quoting: crankshaft
Letting Melker walk is one of the best things Doug WIlson can do this summer. An older, more expensive Melker type is not what we need going forward. We have prospects/young guys like True and Blichfeld ready to step into that role in the bottom six with much more upside and on ELC's.


Thought the role he played was a little more valued than that, but okay, you know your team better than I do
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:48 p.m.
#19
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 1,888
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Thought the role he played was a little more valued than that, but okay, you know your team better than I do


He was great at PK, but on a team with no forward depth, you can't have bottom sixers whose only good quality is the PK.
crankshaft liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 5:04 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: Klara
He was great at PK, but on a team with no forward depth, you can't have bottom sixers whose only good quality is the PK.


We had the best PK this season, it could stand to be a little worse if the replacement can put the puck in the net a little more. Noesen is the most reasonable thought to replace. I think True will step up and take Melker's PK duties, maybe split with Kellman. Gambrell could stand to adapt some PK skills to his game if he expects to stay in the NHL, if not he is doomed to the AHL for a long time, he can't survive on his skill alone.

When Goody departed the best PKer became Couture. Melker didn't seem to raise his game much whether that's the ceiling of his ability or he had just given up ( I think a lot of Sharks just threw in the towel tbh)
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll