SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trying to get younger and acquire picks

Created by: MelonVK
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 19, 2020
Published: Sep. 21, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I criticized a guy for trading away picks in order to compete with Chicago, so here's a suggestion on how they could acquire picks and get younger by taking on some salary and trading away pieces not fit for their long-term plan instead. It's probably a bit overexaggerated - there's a lot of trades in here, but try to think about each trade individually and most importantly conceptually - don't get stuck on if it's a 3rd rounder too much or too little.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,000,000
6$4,000,000
3$4,250,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,250,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Perreault, Mathieu
  2. Roslovic, Jack [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. Shaw, Andrew
  3. 2020 4th round pick (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (CGY)
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (EDM)
  3. 2020 4th round pick (SJS)
3.
CHI
  1. Bjork, Anders
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Saad, Brandon ($2,250,000 retained)
4.
CHI
  1. Alzner, Karl
  2. 2020 1st round pick (MTL)
MTL
  1. De Haan, Calvin
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CHI)
5.
CHI
  1. 2020 4th round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Caggiula, Drake [RFA Rights]
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$73,436,206$1,090,244$5,050,000$8,063,794
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,125,000$4,125,000
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2,198
Realistically i dont think theres too much motivation for MTL to swap Alzner for De Haan and give us a 1st for it. Very similar contract, and the expectation is that Romanov slots into that 2LD spot so either way whoever it is is gonna be the 3LD and not play meaningful minutes
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:28 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: SlickWilly
Realistically i dont think theres too much motivation for MTL to swap Alzner for De Haan and give us a 1st for it. Very similar contract, and the expectation is that Romanov slots into that 2LD spot so either way whoever it is is gonna be the 3LD and not play meaningful minutes


Alright, maybe there's a better team to take on DeHaan while Montreal still gets rid of Alzner in a deal for a pick or a prospect?
SlickWilly liked this.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:29 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,494
Likes: 9,121
WPG MTL COL all decline
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:36 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: Xqb15a
WPG MTL COL all decline


I had the idea Roslovic wanted out of Wpg? And they still need a LHD and possibly a forward? But of course they could still decline.

Mtl I discussed with the guy above, maybe CDH goes somewhere else and Alzner still goes to Chicago?

Colorado could decline, but I'm sure some team wants a winger scoring 10 and getting 18 points in 48 games this year?
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:48 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,494
Likes: 9,121
Quoting: MelonVK
I had the idea Roslovic wanted out of Wpg? And they still need a LHD and possibly a forward? But of course they could still decline.

Mtl I discussed with the guy above, maybe CDH goes somewhere else and Alzner still goes to Chicago?

Colorado could decline, but I'm sure some team wants a winger scoring 10 and getting 18 points in 48 games this year?


A 4th for Caggiula isn’t unreasonable COL just doesn’t need to add to the bottom 6.

WPG I’m not a Jets fan, but for me the difference lies in Roslovic, He Is far and away the most attractive piece of the trade.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:53 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: Xqb15a
A 4th for Caggiula isn’t unreasonable COL just doesn’t need to add to the bottom 6.

WPG I’m not a Jets fan, but for me the difference lies in Roslovic, He Is far and away the most attractive piece of the trade.


I think he is, but Perrault is a burden, while Määttä and Shaw are pretty solid players at decent costs. If Roslovic wants out I don't think this is that unattractive of an offer - depending on what direction the Jets want to go in. As I said, it doesn't have to be the Avs, but most competing teams can probably sling a pick at Chicago for Caggiula. Colorado strikes me as a team to get good value in trades more than anything.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:53 p.m.
#7
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,721
Likes: 12,399
No reason for the Jets to do that.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:56 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
No reason for the Jets to do that.


Is Roslovic more settled? I had the idea he wanted out, but maybe I'm seeing things. Määttä is coming off a pretty good season, and while Shaw obviously had it tough this year, he was great in 18-19. Is the value really that off if Wpg want to compete this year?
Sep. 21, 2020 at 3:59 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,299
Likes: 4,950
pretty sure i was that guy lol. This team is not better than the current one. It's going no where with Dell and Delia as the tandem.swaping saad for Roslovic is a huge downgrade as well, and the defence is attrocious. There's no way this is the right path for the hawks. They should eigther stay the course or try to aquire young already established talent (like sergachev which is what I originally proposed) to add the the young core of Dach, Cat, Kubalik, Boqvist, etc.
MelonVK liked this.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 2,198
Quoting: MelonVK
Alright, maybe there's a better team to take on DeHaan while Montreal still gets rid of Alzner in a deal for a pick or a prospect?


yeah i think the consensus for De Haan is NJ for a 3rd or 4th, depending on how youre feeling that day. As for Alzner getting out of MTL, might be a little tougher but ultimately probably wont cost them a 1st, they arent in dire need for a big cap boost
Sep. 21, 2020 at 4:04 p.m.
#11
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,721
Likes: 12,399
Quoting: MelonVK
Is Roslovic more settled? I had the idea he wanted out, but maybe I'm seeing things. Määttä is coming off a pretty good season, and while Shaw obviously had it tough this year, he was great in 18-19. Is the value really that off if Wpg want to compete this year?


I don't know but he's a controlled asset for 4 more years and that 2nd rounder is 40th overall, I wouldn't part with either for Määtä or Shaw.
There was a rumor he wanted out but should they just cave in and trade him for this if that rumor is true? Nah, not in my opinion anyway.

Hawks might have to buyout Määtä or give Da Haan away to create cap space, those could be cheaper options for the Jets to get a 2nd pair LHD.

If the Jets want to compete this year it'll take a major overhaul and the guy with Dayoff in his name has never been a very active GM so getting back to contender status in one offseason seems highly unlikely.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 4:12 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: Wadejos123
pretty sure i was that guy lol. This team is not better than the current one. It's going no where with Dell and Delia as the tandem.swaping saad for Roslovic is a huge downgrade as well, and the defence is attrocious. There's no way this is the right path for the hawks. They should eigther stay the course or try to aquire young already established talent (like sergachev which is what I originally proposed) to add the the young core of Dach, Cat, Kubalik, Boqvist, etc.


What I think this accomplishes is setting the team up for a real run again in a few years, instead of trying to patch up a ship that keeps on sinking. I feel like Chicago's already on the second run of patching up the mentioned, metaphorical, first round of patches. Of course Saad is better, of course the defense is worse, but you gather assets to make a serious run rather than slowly morphing into the Minnesota Wild.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 4:17 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
I don't know but he's a controlled asset for 4 more years and that 2nd rounder is 40th overall, I wouldn't part with either for Määtä or Shaw.
There was a rumor he wanted out but should they just cave in and trade him for this if that rumor is true? Nah, not in my opinion anyway.

Hawks might have to buyout Määtä or give Da Haan away to create cap space, those could be cheaper options for the Jets to get a 2nd pair LHD.

If the Jets want to compete this year it'll take a major overhaul and the guy with Dayoff in his name has never been a very active GM so getting back to contender status in one offseason seems highly unlikely.


Sure, that could happen too. I wouldn't buy out an improved Määttä, but maybe DeHaan is a better fit in Wpg.
MisstheWhalers liked this.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 4:33 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,123
Likes: 9,458
Quoting: Xqb15a
WPG MTL COL all decline


Agree and hawks decline the Calgary and Boston trades.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 4:55 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 351
Likes: 55
Draft picks and getting younger doesn't always automatically translate into competing in a few years, although overall Bowman/Kelly have been good at drafting players. It's a good thought though to see what trying to get picks/youngers while keeping Toews/Kane/Keith/Seabs would look like. Problem is of course it looks like one should bet the under on wins and over on goals allowed, hah.

Maybe Alzner gets better with a change of scenery? I don't know. Otherwise I don't see how this team is better, especially since the goaltending isn't as good as last year's team when they started out with Lehner/Crawford in tandem. I think the sum of the trades is a step back, and for a team like the Blackhawks with Bowman at least being on the hot seat (or should be if not), I don't think they're in a spot to take even a minor step back.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 5:03 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: RamonDaze
Draft picks and getting younger doesn't always automatically translate into competing in a few years, although overall Bowman/Kelly have been good at drafting players. It's a good thought though to see what trying to get picks/youngers while keeping Toews/Kane/Keith/Seabs would look like. Problem is of course it looks like one should bet the under on wins and over on goals allowed, hah.

Maybe Alzner gets better with a change of scenery? I don't know. Otherwise I don't see how this team is better, especially since the goaltending isn't as good as last year's team when they started out with Lehner/Crawford in tandem. I think the sum of the trades is a step back, and for a team like the Blackhawks with Bowman at least being on the hot seat (or should be if not), I don't think they're in a spot to take even a minor step back.


Oh I agree I don't think they are better. But the point being they are probably that in 2 years or so. Otherwise I think you're looking at this team in two years and wonder why you gave up draft picks or capital (or not accumulating it, which really should be viewed as the exact same thing - staying put is as much of a decision as trying to renew). I don't think Alzner will be good, but I also don't think Chicago should try to be before their roster is flowing with more talent. You don't have to agree with me though!
RamonDaze liked this.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 5:14 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,299
Likes: 4,950
Quoting: MelonVK
What I think this accomplishes is setting the team up for a real run again in a few years, instead of trying to patch up a ship that keeps on sinking. I feel like Chicago's already on the second run of patching up the mentioned, metaphorical, first round of patches. Of course Saad is better, of course the defense is worse, but you gather assets to make a serious run rather than slowly morphing into the Minnesota Wild.


The only assets that were gathered were a few 2nd round picks. That MTL trade isn't happenening. Statisticly the percentages show the chances of that second round pick being a quality player is pretty low. If you're lucky 2 of those 4 2nd turn out. And why couldn't saad and murphy surive a retool and be ready to help make a run in 2-3 years. They are both just entering their prime at 27 years old and could be key pieces in a run down the line. The logic to trade them for 2nd round picks and a few scraps doesn't make any sense to me
MelonVK liked this.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 5:48 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Watches no games
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 977
Quoting: Wadejos123
The only assets that were gathered were a few 2nd round picks. That MTL trade isn't happenening. Statisticly the percentages show the chances of that second round pick being a quality player is pretty low. If you're lucky 2 of those 4 2nd turn out. And why couldn't saad and murphy surive a retool and be ready to help make a run in 2-3 years. They are both just entering their prime at 27 years old and could be key pieces in a run down the line. The logic to trade them for 2nd round picks and a few scraps doesn't make any sense to me


Bjork is an NHLer, just younger and on a cheaper contract. He might be as good as Saad is in 2 years for all we know, and he makes significantly less money. Murphy will require a bigger contract at that point as well. Either you can trade up, or you take the small chance that still is that a 2nd round player becomes Bergeron, Kucherov or whoever. The more picks you have the more likely it becomes you actually find something in the lower rounds.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 8:09 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,494
Likes: 9,121
Quoting: MelonVK
I think he is, but Perrault is a burden, while Määttä and Shaw are pretty solid players at decent costs. If Roslovic wants out I don't think this is that unattractive of an offer - depending on what direction the Jets want to go in. As I said, it doesn't have to be the Avs, but most competing teams can probably sling a pick at Chicago for Caggiula. Colorado strikes me as a team to get good value in trades more than anything.


Here’s the the thing though for COL bottom 6, they Compher, Donskoi, Calvert and PEB all under contract for next year. Jost and Nichushkin are RFA’s and LOC and Kaut are ready for the NHL full time with Bowers probably another 1/2 season away. That’s 8 guys for 6 spots. But I’m not going to really ball at a trade that nets an NHLer for a 4th rd pick, just don’t think they do it.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 8:11 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,494
Likes: 9,121
Quoting: ChiHawk
Agree and hawks decline the Calgary and Boston trades.


Yeah I thought that too just not trying to spike everything people do on here, especially when it isn’t ‘my team’
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll