SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

OEL asking price revealed

Created by: zk97
Team: 2020-21 Arizona Coyotes
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 1, 2020
Published: Oct. 1, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
ARI
    First round pick
    Young blueliner (such as Bouchard or Broberg idk)
    Another contract to even the cap
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    2021
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    2022
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    Logo of the ARI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    17$81,500,000$70,936,951$196,951$1,750,000$10,563,049
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $3,350,000$3,350,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $7,150,000$7,150,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $1,533,333$1,533,333
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $5,850,000$5,850,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $6,800,000$6,800,000
    RW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $775,000$775,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $4,450,000$4,450,000
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $5,275,000$5,275,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$1,750,000$2M)
    C, LW
    RFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $3,937,500$3,937,500
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $5,475,000$5,475,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $4,600,000$4,600,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:08 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 24,044
    Likes: 7,749
    Zero interest at that price. None. I mean, who in their right mind would pay that for OEL if the possibility exists that Pietrangelo could be signed to nearly that exact contract with ZERO assets given up? AZ is dreaming in technicolor on this one.
    Jeuck75 and Smokingun71 liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:08 a.m.
    #2
    Jeuck75
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 4,079
    Likes: 1,603
    I think its a bit too much. I'd rather keep my prospects
    Smokingun71 liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:09 a.m.
    #3
    Jeuck75
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 4,079
    Likes: 1,603
    Quoting: CD282
    Zero interest at that price. None. I mean, who in their right mind would pay that for OEL if the possibility exists that Pietrangelo could be signed to nearly that exact contract with ZERO assets given up? AZ is dreaming in technicolor on this one.


    Rutherford would pay thatlaugh
    CD282 liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:12 a.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 38,334
    Likes: 19,566
    Quoting: CD282
    Zero interest at that price. None. I mean, who in their right mind would pay that for OEL if the possibility exists that Pietrangelo could be signed to nearly that exact contract with ZERO assets given up? AZ is dreaming in technicolor on this one.


    That is a very moddest price for OEL first of all. Secondly unlike Pietrangelo, OEL is a guaranteed asset + you are dumping cap the other way so you are getting him technically at a discount. I think 2021 1st + Broberg/Jones + Russell is an excellent deal for Edmonton.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:23 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2018
    Posts: 1,616
    Likes: 748
    No way that we should include Bouchard or Broberg in any deal. The most that I would do is our 2021 first, Jones and Russell. If push came to shove then I might include Benson but that’s it.
    Jeuck75 liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:23 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 24,044
    Likes: 7,749
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    That is a very moddest price for OEL first of all. Secondly unlike Pietrangelo, OEL is a guaranteed asset + you are dumping cap the other way so you are getting him technically at a discount. I think 2021 1st + Broberg/Jones + Russell is an excellent deal for Edmonton.


    OEL isn't the player he was in 2015 though. He's already declining and he's almost 30, and signed to top-10 defenseman money for 7 more years. That's a terrible deal, we don't want it and we certainly aren't giving up assets for it. Someone suggested James Neal + the 2020 1st, but that's too steep already. Adding Broberg, who was 8th overall and seems to be living up to that billing, who will be a great top-4 defenseman for 10-15 years to that deal is asinine.
    Jeuck75 liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:24 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 24,044
    Likes: 7,749
    Quoting: Smokingun71
    No way that we should include Bouchard or Broberg in any deal. The most that I would do is our 2021 first, Jones and Russell. If push came to shove then I might include Benson but that’s it.


    Jones is probably as good as OEL right now, he's $850k for the next 2 years. No way I do that.
    Jeuck75 liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:32 a.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 38,334
    Likes: 19,566
    Quoting: CD282
    OEL isn't the player he was in 2015 though. He's already declining and he's almost 30, and signed to top-10 defenseman money for 7 more years. That's a terrible deal, we don't want it and we certainly aren't giving up assets for it. Someone suggested James Neal + the 2020 1st, but that's too steep already. Adding Broberg, who was 8th overall and seems to be living up to that billing, who will be a great top-4 defenseman for 10-15 years to that deal is asinine.


    I mean sure if he keeps up his over ppg pace in the SHL then yes but its also only been 2 games and he had a really rough season last year. OEL hasnt been declining, he was 11th last year in Norris votes. Most of his struggles have come from misuse under Tocchet. Like I said though, Jones is probably fine too, they need to use their expansion slots on someone besides Chychrun anyways.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:32 a.m.
    #9
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,362
    Likes: 3,361
    Fun twitter fact of the day: Most analytics people say OELs closest comparable in player and contract is Subban, so just some food for thought
    CD282 liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:32 a.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 38,334
    Likes: 19,566
    Quoting: CD282
    Jones is probably as good as OEL right now, he's $850k for the next 2 years. No way I do that.


    i mean this is just so incredibly wrong I dont know where to begin.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:43 a.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 24,044
    Likes: 7,749
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    I mean sure if he keeps up his over ppg pace in the SHL then yes but its also only been 2 games and he had a really rough season last year.

    I mean this is just so incredibly wrong I don't know where to begin.

    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    OEL hasnt been declining

    OEL's 5v5 GF% (rel) for the past 4 years:

    2016-17: 45.69% (+2.92)
    2017-18: 45.76% (-0.47)
    2018-19: 43.93% (-2.74)
    2019-20: 48.28% (-3.34)

    That's a decline by any measure. And he's nearly 30 on a contract that could possibly land a much, much better defenseman in Alex Pietrangelo without spending any assets. And your suggestion for dumping money the other way was Kris Russell, who is owed just $1.5M on his contract. This is hardly comparable to the $54M still owed to OEL. Remember, AZ is not going to be spending to the cap going forward, they'll have an internal budget probably $10M or more below, and the money owed OEL means much, much more to them than the cap hit.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 8:46 a.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 40,169
    Likes: 18,355
    2022 1st round pick
    Caleb Jones
    James Neal
    JmoneyTalk liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 9:00 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 24,044
    Likes: 7,749
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    i mean this is just so incredibly wrong I dont know where to begin.


    How about starting with a look at how they fared relative to their teammates?

    Jones
    +1.59 CF% rel
    +0.90 FF% rel
    +2.81 SF% rel
    +6.40 GF% rel
    +1.91 xGF% rel

    OEL
    -0.47 CF% rel
    -1.94 FF% rel
    -3.07 SF% rel
    -3.34 GF% rel
    -2.77 xGF% rel

    You can argue that Jones played a more sheltered role and that makes a difference, and you'd be right. But Jones did spend a significant amount of time in the top-4 replacing Klefbom when he was injured, and his results (+16.03 GF% rel) were BETTER than when he was on the 3rd pair. I guess Adam Larsson is just that good...

    Look, I realise that Holland isn't going to want to go into training camp depending on a guy who has just 62 NHL games experience to hold down a top-4 position, but that doesn't mean you throw a bunch of premium assets at one of the worst contracts in the league today.
    JmoneyTalk liked this.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 10:14 a.m.
    #14
    Legend
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 10
    Likes: 1
    Something along the lines of Lavoie, Athanasiou, Jones/Samorukov, and Russell for OEL and Fischer probably works for Edmonton. I'd think Holland is willing to give away good young players with Russell at 4 million (2.5 million real dollars) to acquire all of OEL's contract, but NOT Bouchard or Broberg, and definitely not Edmonton's 14th pick until at least after the draft.
    Oct. 1, 2020 at 11:06 a.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 24,044
    Likes: 7,749
    Quoting: boomshocks
    Something along the lines of Lavoie, Athanasiou, Jones/Samorukov, and Russell for OEL and Fischer probably works for Edmonton. I'd think Holland is willing to give away good young players with Russell at 4 million (2.5 million real dollars) to acquire all of OEL's contract, but NOT Bouchard or Broberg, and definitely not Edmonton's 14th pick until at least after the draft.


    Russell is owed just $1.5M. That doesn't even scratch the surface of OEL's $54M owed. Even Neal's $17.25M is less than 1/3 the money owed to OEL. That contract is crippling AZ, there's no need to give up A-level prospects for that. For comparison:

    Josi: $61.472 over 8 years ($7.68M per)
    McDavid: $57M over 6 years
    Ekman-Larsson: $54M over 7 years ($7.71M per)
    Spurgeon: $49M over 7 years ($7M per)
    Carlsson: $38M over 6 years ($6.33M)
    Marner: $35M over 5 years
    Tavares: $34.11M over 5 years
    Draisaitl: $34M over 5 years
    Matthews: $27.07M over 4 years

    In a scenario where all teams are facing a drastic reduction in revenue, the OEL contract will be very, very hard to move. Nobody is giving up prime assets and throwing in a $1.5M contract for this beast. It's a McDavid-money level of commitment for a player who hasn't been at the top of his game for several years and will soon be in his 30's.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll