SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Unfortunately This Looks to Be the Team

Created by: ChiHawk
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 9, 2020
Published: Oct. 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Shaw won't make it a full season and go on LITR and retire after the season.

Nylander will not see much improvement, Suter will be given an opportunity.

Carps and Saad will get traded at the TDL.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,750,000
3$3,800,000
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$70,578,814$1,090,244$6,832,500$10,921,186
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:16 a.m.
#1
Chewbacca88
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 114
Good lord we have to pay Mitchell, Toews, Kane, DeBrincat, and Kubalik all in 3 years. That will cost what, 25 million dollars?
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:17 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 1,760
WOW!! that is some team friendly deals right there
Strome will most likely start at 5 AAV and Kubalik might go long term and itll cost the hawks most likley between 6-7 AAV
They are still gonna have to move out some cash. Dehaan and/or Sadd
BCAPP and OlegP liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:20 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: CrazyK04
Good lord we have to pay Mitchell, Toews, Kane, DeBrincat, and Kubalik all in 3 years. That will cost what, 25 million dollars?


At that point with Covid over and people back in the stands in 21/22 plus the money flowing from Seattle, there should be a pretty big jump in the cap, probably to $84M'ish. De Haan, Shaw, Saad and Murphy all will likely be off the books at that time. Toews will be $4M less at least, and Kane will be $3M less maybe more. Cat will unlikely get that much of a raise.
Hawks_Are_Dumm liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:21 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,383
Likes: 3,695
How did you get Strome and Kubailk to sign so cheap
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:21 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: masterjuddi
WOW!! that is some team friendly deals right there
Strome will most likely start at 5 AAV and Kubalik might go long term and itll cost the hawks most likley between 6-7 AAV
They are still gonna have to move out some cash. Dehaan and/or Sadd


Wrong. Strome doesn't have arbitration rights. Both of these deals are being reported by The Athletic.
Cham liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:22 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: BCAPP
How did you get Strome and Kubailk to sign so cheap


The Athletic reported this last night that Strome and Kubalik are both close to getting deals done at the price reflected here.
Cham liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:23 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,383
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: ChiHawk
At that point with Covid over and people back in the stands in 21/22 plus the money flowing from Seattle, there should be a pretty big jump in the cap, probably to $84M'ish. De Haan, Shaw, Saad and Murphy all will likely be off the books at that time. Toews will be $4M less at least, and Kane will be $3M less maybe more. Cat will unlikely get that much of a raise.


It's really hard to know what kind of cashflow professional sports will see in the medium term.

My guess is when they open up to fans there will be a short term bump from missing it and built up pressure.

Then my guess (pure guess) will be fairly significantly lower revenues for a few years while people deal with lower employment rates, lost income, etc.

Sports are a luxury purchase.
ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
This team should trade Kane.
The cap isn't going to get any better next year. If anything it will get worse.
Two years of players wanting raises and no cap increase.
Kane will also be older, he's 32 this year. He'll be 33 next.
I can't imagine he's looking at this team right now and saying, this is where I want to be. Team with no effort to help him win. High taxes, city full of riots and shootings.

Every year that goes by the return on him will be smaller. By the time the cap starts to fix itself he'll be a 34 year old rental,
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 1,760
Quoting: ChiHawk
Wrong. Strome doesn't have arbitration rights. Both of these deals are being reported by The Athletic.


WHo cares about arbitration. He still needs to sign the deal and 2 years makes no sense, maybe one. Domi just got 5.3 for two years and I would take Strome over him all day long.
I coudl be wrong, but these deals are not market value, If i were both those guys I would be holding out for more cash
OlegP liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: ChiHawk
At that point with Covid over and people back in the stands in 21/22 plus the money flowing from Seattle, there should be a pretty big jump in the cap, probably to $84M'ish. De Haan, Shaw, Saad and Murphy all will likely be off the books at that time. Toews will be $4M less at least, and Kane will be $3M less maybe more. Cat will unlikely get that much of a raise.


they have already said the cap is flat for the next 2 years. What are you even talking about.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.
#11
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,590
Likes: 11,268
what are your thoughts on this:



ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:26 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: BCAPP
It's really hard to know what kind of cashflow professional sports will see in the medium term.

My guess is when they open up to fans there will be a short term bump from missing it and built up pressure.

Then my guess (pure guess) will be fairly significantly lower revenues for a few years while people deal with lower employment rates, lost income, etc.

Sports are a luxury purchase.


Don't disagree but there is also a new TV deal during this time as well as the Seattle revenues as all season tickets are sold out. The big clubs aren't the concern (Hawks hold the longest sellout streak and still going) it's the smaller markets that are most concerning in what you are saying which impacts total NHL revenues and as such the cap. I still think the NHL has no choice but to raise the cap to $84M in 3 years or more. Too many teams will be totally cap strapped and the players who's contracts are coming up will want raises regardless.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:29 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,383
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: ChiHawk
Don't disagree but there is also a new TV deal during this time as well as the Seattle revenues as all season tickets are sold out. The big clubs aren't the concern (Hawks hold the longest sellout streak and still going) it's the smaller markets that are most concerning in what you are saying which impacts total NHL revenues and as such the cap. I still think the NHL has no choice but to raise the cap to $84M in 3 years or more. Too many teams will be totally cap strapped and the players who's contracts are coming up will want raises regardless.


Maybe but the economy will have a large say. They could just give a compliance buyout and not raise the cap.

Players are having huge escrow just to have the cap this high. The economy will dictate a lot

But we're all guessing here. Time will tell
ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,383
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: ChiHawk
The Athletic reported this last night that Strome and Kubalik are both close to getting deals done at the price reflected here.


Wow.

That is insanely cheap.
ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: masterjuddi
WHo cares about arbitration. He still needs to sign the deal and 2 years makes no sense, maybe one. Domi just got 5.3 for two years and I would take Strome over him all day long.
I coudl be wrong, but these deals are not market value, If i were both those guys I would be holding out for more cash


If Strome wants to play, he has to sign with the Hawks. He has no choice if he wants to play in the NHL. I agree, he might sign a 1 year deal but the money won't be above $3M for a 1 year. Kubalik has arbitration rights but there has never been a player in the history of the NHL that has only played 1 season and scored 30 goals and been up for a new contract so nothing to compare to. I'm not a fan of a 3 year deal for Kubalik because it walks him to UFA but that's the trade off for a lower price.

I trust The Athletic more then any source. They rarely speculate or guess, usually everything they report is pretty spot on. Strome they said will be $2.5M to $3M for 2 years. Kubalik 3 years for $3.5M to $4M.

The Domi deal is a joke; the guy is WAY overrated.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:34 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: pharrow
they have already said the cap is flat for the next 2 years. What are you even talking about.


This thread is talking about in 3 years; please follow along smile
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:35 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: mondo
what are your thoughts on this:





Yeah, saw something like that as well. My guess is they will, but who knows with No Plan Stan Bowman
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:37 a.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: ChiHawk
This thread is talking about in 3 years; please follow along smile


no one knows what the number will be in 3 years. Because of the new tv deal.
And if the NHL is smart enough to put it on multiple networks like they should.

But if they keep killing their ratings turning hockey into a stupid ass social justice platform it won't be worth ****.

Worst finals ratings in years. In a time where everyone is stuck at home.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:39 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: pharrow
This team should trade Kane.
The cap isn't going to get any better next year. If anything it will get worse.
Two years of players wanting raises and no cap increase.
Kane will also be older, he's 32 this year. He'll be 33 next.
I can't imagine he's looking at this team right now and saying, this is where I want to be. Team with no effort to help him win. High taxes, city full of riots and shootings.

Every year that goes by the return on him will be smaller. By the time the cap starts to fix itself he'll be a 34 year old rental,


You have an obvious obsession with Kane and keep trolling Hawks posts with the same comment. Bottom line, Kane has to be willing to be traded...it is HIS call not the Hawks. If he asks to be traded I'm sure the Hawks would entertain it but there has been ZERO reports about it coming out of Chicago. The ONLY player from the old guard the Hawks have approached about waiving is Seabrook and he has declined twice. Kane is deep part of the Hawks organization 12 months a year beyond what you see on the ice, likely he will be part of the Hawks beyond when his career on the ice ends. Toews and Keith are more likely to ask to be traded and waive then Kane at this point IMO.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:40 a.m.
#20
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,590
Likes: 11,268
Quoting: pharrow
no one knows what the number will be in 3 years. Because of the new tv deal.
And if the NHL is smart enough to put it on multiple networks like they should.

But if they keep killing their ratings turning hockey into a stupid ass social justice platform it won't be worth ****.

Worst finals ratings in years. In a time where everyone is stuck at home.


NHL finals were against literally everything happening at the same time. I don't think social justice had anything to do with it.
BCAPP and ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:40 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,383
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: ChiHawk
If Strome wants to play, he has to sign with the Hawks. He has no choice if he wants to play in the NHL. I agree, he might sign a 1 year deal but the money won't be above $3M for a 1 year. Kubalik has arbitration rights but there has never been a player in the history of the NHL that has only played 1 season and scored 30 goals and been up for a new contract so nothing to compare to. I'm not a fan of a 3 year deal for Kubalik because it walks him to UFA but that's the trade off for a lower price.

I trust The Athletic more then any source. They rarely speculate or guess, usually everything they report is pretty spot on. Strome they said will be $2.5M to $3M for 2 years. Kubalik 3 years for $3.5M to $4M.

The Domi deal is a joke; the guy is WAY overrated.


Domi averaged about 20 goals and 60 points over the last two seasons in 82 gp as a c. As a Ufa that's worth 7ish million based on recent contracts.

C's get a lot. Why can't another team offersheet Strome?
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:42 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 9,383
Likes: 3,695
Quoting: pharrow
no one knows what the number will be in 3 years. Because of the new tv deal.
And if the NHL is smart enough to put it on multiple networks like they should.

But if they keep killing their ratings turning hockey into a stupid ass social justice platform it won't be worth ****.

Worst finals ratings in years. In a time where everyone is stuck at home.


What on earth are you talking about? Players pointing out they don't want racism... That was about it on social justice. Then they just played hockey...
ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:43 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,377
Likes: 5,038
unless saad or dehaan are moved for cap space this will be the team
ChiHawk liked this.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:45 a.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,414
Likes: 9,974
Quoting: pharrow
no one knows what the number will be in 3 years. Because of the new tv deal.
And if the NHL is smart enough to put it on multiple networks like they should.

But if they keep killing their ratings turning hockey into a stupid ass social justice platform it won't be worth ****.

Worst finals ratings in years. In a time where everyone is stuck at home.


I get that, we are just speculating which is the point of the forums. My opinion, the cap will be $84Mish in 3 more seasons. This season revenues will be bad, next season the stadiums will be packed again and revenues start recovering, the following season the NHL will be able to dig itself out from Covid. That's 3 more seasons at which point the cap will be $84M'ish going into the season 4th season from now.
Oct. 9, 2020 at 11:46 a.m.
#25
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: mondo
NHL finals were against literally everything happening at the same time. I don't think social justice had anything to do with it.


worst NBA and NHL both ratings in forever, totally tanked.
Keep telling yourself that.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll