Quoting: VijayPatel11
Classic CapFriendly, sending a list of stats with no context and using it to justify your statement, not once actually explaining what the hell is the significance...
lol no context?
kerfoot and kadri both produced effectively the same point totals at 3C. kerfoot had more blocks, less giveaways etc.
kadri only scored 30 goals when he played 2C minutes with marner. Otherwise he's a run of the mill 15-20 goal 40-50 point grinder centreman
we lost a bunch of 'intangibles' when we traded him, yeah, but he also never won us a round, he actually cost us 1, arguably two with his stupid penalties and suspensions
kadri was straight up NOT suited for a 3C role, he struggled bigtime
with that extra million we saved were able to afford one of bogosian, vesey, thornton, jake muzzin's raise etc.
I'd rather have kerfoot and one of those guys than just kadri at 3C
with JT, he became expensive and obsolete so we traded him for a 60 point dman and a better 2way centre who was cheaper/younger. it was supposed to be brodie/janikowski, but instead we got kerfoot/barrie, let barrie walk and signed brodie anyway. Since kerfoot > janikowski, I'd say it worked out rather well imo