SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Part 2 Hawks rebuild at TDL

Created by: exo2769
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 29, 2020
Published: Dec. 31, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Part 2 is to utilize the pending UFAs the best you can. This is obviously a bit of a projection and we have no idea how well Janmark/Soderberg will play this year.

We don't have a crystal ball...so maybe there's salary coming back again??? IDK, but trading the pending UFAs is an absolute must.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Demers, Jason
  2. Jeník, Jan
Additional Details:
PREVIOUS POST - Saves $3M in salary for a team about to go bankrupt
ARI
  1. 2021 4th round pick (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Perreault, Mathieu
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
PREVIOUS POST - Frees up cap for WPG
WPG
3.
CHI
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
TOR Desperate needs 2-way players. Big bodies that can be versatile wing/center and be selfless. They're not cup contenders until they A.) make it past the 1st round and B.) get a team built for playoff hockey. Soderberg helps out a ton.
4.
CHI
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
I think MTL is going to be a big surprise this year. MTL already has a really deep farm system and A LOT of freakin picks. I don't think MB will be afraid to trade away a 3rd for a defensive and physical forward. Quite honestly...it wouldn't even be to win the cup. It would be to help guys like Jesperi/Suzuki/Romanov gain even more and deeper playoff experience.
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$65,378,814$1,090,244$2,715,000$16,121,186
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$880,833$880,833
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000 ($2,175,000$2M$2,175,000$2M)
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$742,500$742,500 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,125,000$4,125,000 ($3,050,000$3M$3,050,000$3M)
LW, RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:03 a.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
With a 2 week quarantine mandatory before coming over the border, I doubt you are going to get a good return for anyone going to Canada.
exo2769 liked this.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:08 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
With a 2 week quarantine mandatory before coming over the border, I doubt you are going to get a good return for anyone going to Canada.


Yeah, maybe. Its certainly a valid point. Do you think that just means trades might happen sooner than the TDL though?
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:10 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,754
Likes: 7,382
If Toronto wanted Soderberg enough to give up anything of value, they'd have just signed him.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:13 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
If Toronto wanted Soderberg enough to give up anything of value, they'd have just signed him.


Jesus dude...we're not starting this again. They've currently over the cap and can't sign anyone. Maybe Sodeberg was trying to hold out for more and realized everyone else was signing real cheap...so now that TOR can't sign anyone he settled. Understand the stiuations. Not every player was born to go out of their way to help the Leafs.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:21 a.m.
#5
MD
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 60
Likes: 5
Habs are up against cap ceiling they dont have room for a 2m+ player for the bottom 6 plus for a defensive and physical player his -10 career and less than 100 hits over his career add to that his turnover vs takeaways is -21 id call that a bit underwhelming https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/j/janmama02.html
exo2769 liked this.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:23 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,754
Likes: 7,382
Quoting: exo2769
Jesus dude...we're not starting this again. They've currently over the cap and can't sign anyone. Maybe Sodeberg was trying to hold out for more and realized everyone else was signing real cheap...so now that TOR can't sign anyone he settled. Understand the stiuations. Not every player was born to go out of their way to help the Leafs.


Jesus dude, were not starting this again, if the leafs wanted Soderberg they'd have signed Soderberg instead of the other players they signed. Especially if they were "desperate " for 2 way players like him like you are implying.
They are not giving up a 2nd or anything else of value for him
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:24 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 3,045
Quoting: exo2769
Jesus dude...we're not starting this again. They've currently over the cap and can't sign anyone. Maybe Sodeberg was trying to hold out for more and realized everyone else was signing real cheap...so now that TOR can't sign anyone he settled. Understand the stiuations. Not every player was born to go out of their way to help the Leafs.


Toronto isn't currently over the cap and even then that doesn't stop you from being able to sign people in the offseason. Soderberg's 1 mil aav ask would have been very easy for them to handle this offseason. If you are going to try and act like an expert on this, you should probably have your bases covered.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:29 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: Byrr
Toronto isn't currently over the cap and even then that doesn't stop you from being able to sign people in the offseason. Soderberg's 1 mil aav ask would have been very easy for them to handle this offseason. If you are going to try and act like an expert on this, you should probably have your bases covered.


No doubt it won't stop anyone from signing. TOR can send people down like Sandin / Roberston, sure. The problem is even if you do that...it's still $666k in cap. Which if there was ever an irony it's that there's $666k cap. The TDL also free's up cap space considering how it's calculated on a daily pro-rata basis. I'm not an expert, but certainly bringing more information to this convo than you pretending to do.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: JEFE
Habs are up against cap ceiling they dont have room for a 2m+ player for the bottom 6 plus for a defensive and physical player his -10 career and less than 100 hits over his career add to that his turnover vs takeaways is -21 id call that a bit underwhelming https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/j/janmama02.html


That's fair.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:35 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 3,045
Quoting: exo2769
No doubt it won't stop anyone from signing. TOR can send people down like Sandin / Roberston, sure. The problem is even if you do that...it's still $666k in cap. Which if there was ever an irony it's that there's $666k cap. The TDL also free's up cap space considering how it's calculated on a daily pro-rata basis. I'm not an expert, but certainly bringing more information to this convo than you pretending to do.


So you realize that Söderberg would be replacing someone on that roster right? Who even earning a minimum league salary of $750,000 would make that $666,000 in cap into around $1,416,000. Enough to comfortable fit Söderberg's $1,000,000 AAV and have $416,000 to spare. Basic math here bud, you would have covered this in grade school. Shame the only thing you were able to bring to this convo was a bad idea.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:37 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: Byrr
So you realize that Söderberg would be replacing someone on that roster right? Who even earning a minimum league salary of $750,000 would make that $666,000 in cap into $1,400,000. Enough to comfortable fit Söderberg's $1,000,000 AAV and have $400,000 to spare. Basic math here bud, you would have covered this in grade school. Shame the only thing you were able to bring to this convo was a bad idea.


If you could only read it would help... Soderberg had to settle for $1M after realizing everyone else was signing dirt cheap. He was holding out for more....Soderberg signed on Dec 26th.....AFTER all the TOR signings. So unless you're telling guys that you just signed to take a hike...Not happening, then you're just wrong. He'd be added to it.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:39 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 3,045
Edited Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
Quoting: exo2769
If you could only read it would help... Soderberg had to settle for $1M after realizing everyone else was signing dirt cheap. He was holding out for more....Soderberg signed on Dec 26th.....AFTER all the TOR signings. So unless you're telling guys that you just signed to take a hike...Not happening, then you're just wrong. He'd be added to it.


So you figure he didn't revisit with every team who had had talks with him before signing for only $1,000,000 in Chicago? I don't think you realize how this works. Even if you're right, you arn't but lets go to fantasy land here, ultimately your just showing how Jared was right in that Toronto passed on him. Since we've covered how money wasn't the issue, why would they want him now for the ridiculous price of a 2nd?

Its interesting that you think asking the vets they've signed to sit for games is suddenly an issue. Being an expert on Toronto's cap situation, I figured you noticed there are currently 10 players or so competing for the bottom 6 slots. Why is it the 11th is the issue for you? And where exactly do you think he's going to play after being acquired at the trade deadline? Sitting one of those signed vets for games is an issue at the start of the season for you but it disappears 30ish games in?
Dec. 31, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: exo2769
Yeah, maybe. Its certainly a valid point. Do you think that just means trades might happen sooner than the TDL though?


For some teams likely but teams that are rolling and had the foresight to sign a pile of depth guys, I imagine they'll stand Pat unless injuries occur.
exo2769 liked this.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:12 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: Byrr
So you figure he didn't revisit with every team who had had talks with him before signing for only $1,000,000 in Chicago? I don't think you realize how this works. Even if you're right, you arn't but lets go to fantasy land here, ultimately your just showing how Jared was right in that Toronto passed on him. Since we've covered how money wasn't the issue, why would they want him now for the ridiculous price of a 2nd?

Its interesting that you think asking the vets they've signed to sit for games is suddenly an issue. Being an expert on Toronto's cap situation, I figured you noticed there are currently 10 players or so competing for the bottom 6 slots. Why is it the 11th is the issue for you? And where exactly do you think he's going to play after being acquired at the trade deadline? Sitting one of those signed vets for games is an issue at the start of the season for you but it disappears 30ish games in?


TOR needed to sign guys like Spezza and Thornton for $700k because TOR didn't have a lot of cap space. They signed on OCTOBER 5th and OCTOBER 16th. Are we good so far?

TOR needed to sign their RFAs like Mikheyev and Dermott and didn't have enough cap space anymore EVEN for $1M of Soderberg. Carl was asking for more, but saw other veterans for REAL cheap and his options are diminishing FAST the more vets sign. Carl settled for $1M. Are we good so far?

As for the vet situation. I actually think you bring up a VERY good point. I can't predict the future. I can't predict whether Thornton will come back and be a Hart winner (exaggeration) or like he should stay in Davos. Carl is a very good 2-way player and TOR needs more of these guys. Spezza ad 37 and Thornton at 41 could be ROUGH. We don't know.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:13 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 3,045
Quoting: exo2769
TOR needed to sign guys like Spezza and Thornton for $700k because TOR didn't have a lot of cap space. They signed on OCTOBER 5th and OCTOBER 16th. Are we good so far?

TOR needed to sign their RFAs like Mikheyev and Dermott and didn't have enough cap space anymore EVEN for $1M of Soderberg. Carl was asking for more, but saw other veterans for REAL cheap and his options are diminishing FAST. Carl settled for $1M. Are we good so far?.

As for the vet situation. I actually think you bring up a VERY good point. I can't predict the future. I can't predict whether Thornton will come back and be a Hart winner (exaggeration) or like he should stay in Davos. Carl is a very good 2-way player and TOR needs more of these guys. Spezza ad 37 and Thornton at 41 could be ROUGH. We don't know.


We've covered this already right? How $1 mil only actually requires about $250,000 extra cap space, an amount that always been available and still is.

As for the vets, you've got me confused even trying to agree with me. Is sitting vets an issue or isn't it?
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:15 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
For some teams likely but teams that are rolling and had the foresight to sign a pile of depth guys, I imagine they'll stand Pat unless injuries occur.


This is actually the best point I've read on this website in a long time. Maybe the typical TDL moves won't happen AT ALL this year because those guys are sitting on the taxi squad? Teams with money like TOR should do their best to fill up the taxi squad with as many veterans as possible.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:20 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 5,299
For Soderberg to entice the Leafs as an option, especially for the cost of a 2nd, he needs to rebound in a big way, imo. I agree with you that the Leafs could use some more 2-way guys, but Soderberg was pretty ass in that regard last season; didn't have a good year defensively at all.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:22 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: Byrr
We've covered this already right? How $1 mil only actually requires about $250,000 extra cap space, an amount that always been available and still is.

As for the vets, you've got me confused even trying to agree with me. Is sitting vets an issue or isn't it?


We have...and you're not listening to the timeline. TOR doesn't have $1M today...they haven't had $1M since October 17th due to the RFAs they needed to sign. We good? I'm not sure you're actually reading anything.

I think PBMFMOG brought up a point that no one's brought up. Full up the taxi squad will all the guys TOR needs. Who cares if they sit or not.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:26 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 3,045
Quoting: exo2769
We have...and you're not listening to the timeline. TOR doesn't have $1M today...they haven't had $1M since October 17th due to the RFAs they needed to sign. We good? I'm not sure you're actually reading anything.

I think PBMFMOG brought up a point that no one's brought up. Full up the taxi squad will all the guys TOR needs. Who cares if they sit or not.


Ok, so if we can agree that sitting vets isn't an issue then you've got to realize that Toronto doesn't need $1M for Soderberg anymore right? He's only at most $250,000 more than the guy who he would be replacing on the roster, the guy whos sitting. An amount that Toronto has had available all along.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:37 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,308
Likes: 4,961
Price may be a little steep on Soderberg but the idea is to dump him for a pick which I like. I also thin one of Murphy or Zadorov need to be moved. Unless Kieth or Seabs wave they both need to be protected leaving one of zadorov or murphy exposed. I would hate to lose one of them for nothing
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:39 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: Wadejos123
Price may be a little steep on Soderberg but the idea is to dump him for a pick which I like. I also thin one of Murphy or Zadorov need to be moved. Unless Kieth or Seabs wave they both need to be protected leaving one of zadorov or murphy exposed. I would hate to lose one of them for nothing


Yeah, I think Seabs will waive. I'd even go so far as to sign Seabs to another 1 year league minimum contract for him to waive.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:41 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,308
Likes: 4,961
Quoting: exo2769
Yeah, I think Seabs will waive. I'd even go so far as to sign Seabs to another 1 year league minimum contract for him to waive.


I'm confused at what you're saying. Seabs has 4 years left on the worst contract in the nfl. It's gonna be a steep price to get seattle to take him. What do you mean 1 year league min for him to waive?
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:48 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,769
Likes: 9,941
Quoting: Wadejos123
I'm confused at what you're saying. Seabs has 4 years left on the worst contract in the nfl. It's gonna be a steep price to get seattle to take him. What do you mean 1 year league min for him to waive?


I'd extend him to a new contract for another 1 year deal for ~$750k...remove the NMC. Then whenever that year comes waive him and "send him" to rockford, but he will have retired by then. It's essentially paying for him to waive.
Dec. 31, 2020 at 11:55 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,308
Likes: 4,961
Quoting: exo2769
I'd extend him to a new contract for another 1 year deal for ~$750k...remove the NMC. Then whenever that year comes waive him and "send him" to rockford, but he will have retired by then. It's essentially paying for him to waive.


I'm not sure 750k is enough for him to drop a NMC unless Toews is seriously hurt/sick and Kane and Kieth are on the Way out too but I get the idea now
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll