SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

PLD Bonino

Created by: jnowariak
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 22, 2021
Published: Jan. 22, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
MTL
  1. Bonino, Nick ($2,050,000 retained)
  2. Johansson, Marcus ($2,250,000 retained)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$73,857,976$0$637,500$7,642,024
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,050,000$2,050,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$735,000$735,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$771,666$771,666 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 22, 2021 at 4:53 p.m.
#1
Habs_fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 697
Likes: 163
You just traded away two centerman and your top goalscorer and got nothing in return. Makes no sense to me
Jan. 22, 2021 at 4:54 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: p1015983
You just traded away two centerman and your top goalscorer and got nothing in return. Makes no sense to me


PLD?
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
#3
Zuke is the goat
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 1,574
You should stick to your team. You clearly dont know the value of Danault and the purpose of making a trade. MTL trade away 3 top 6 players for 1 top 6 guy and a bottom line and older guy. That is simply horrendous. Pls abstain from making any habs trade.

Have a good day good sir
GMs liked this.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,282
Likes: 7,139
Yeah, I'd much rather have Danault + KK + Tatar than Dubois + Bonino + Johansson at this point.
MTLaveragefan and GMs liked this.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:05 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: math731
You should stick to your team. You clearly dont know the value of Danault and the purpose of making a trade. MTL trade away 3 top 6 players for 1 top 6 guy and a bottom line and older guy. That is simply horrendous. Pls abstain from making any habs trade.

Have a good day good sir


Glad I could offend you so.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:06 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: villenash
Yeah, I'd much rather have Danault + KK + Tatar than Dubois + Bonino + Johansson at this point.


I kind of agree, but I also think PLD is gonna cost KK ++. I also think MTL is gonna get suckered into buying him even if its not the best idea.
villenash liked this.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:09 p.m.
#7
I post sometimes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,817
Likes: 1,713
How about a ham sandwich and a tractor wheel from Timmys for Bonino? That's about his worth to the habs
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:14 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 394
Likes: 28
This is a dump. Why would the Jackets want this trade? Tatar’s deal is up this year and Kotkaniemi isn’t that good. Not sure what the CBJ are actually getting here besides a 2nd round pick? Do you see this to be even/fair?
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:18 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: CBJStats79
This is a dump. Why would the Jackets want this trade? Tatar’s deal is up this year and Kotkaniemi isn’t that good. Not sure what the CBJ are actually getting here besides a 2nd round pick? Do you see this to be even/fair?


Pretty good value actually. I was debating whether Tatar should even be a part of it. KK isn’t far off of PLD but he’s got a few more years til he’s fully there.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:28 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 394
Likes: 28
Quoting: jnowariak
Pretty good value actually. I was debating whether Tatar should even be a part of it. KK isn’t far off of PLD but he’s got a few more years til he’s fully there.


Then why even make the trade?
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:33 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: CBJStats79
Then why even make the trade?


If you’re MTL? Because you can make your team better for a long time. And because it just feels like they are gonna make the move.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:38 p.m.
#12
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 3,089
Quoting: CBJStats79
This is a dump. Why would the Jackets want this trade? Tatar’s deal is up this year and Kotkaniemi isn’t that good. Not sure what the CBJ are actually getting here besides a 2nd round pick? Do you see this to be even/fair?


They get 2 guys who wore Habs jerseys, so future hall of famers!
CBJStats79 liked this.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:40 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 394
Likes: 28
Quoting: jnowariak
If you’re MTL? Because you can make your team better for a long time. And because it just feels like they are gonna make the move.


If you think they are basically the same player why make the trade? I just don’t think it’s enough coming to the CBJ. You can’t assume only on Kotkaniemi future play and Tatar’s contract isn’t long enough. Maybe Drouin, Kotkaniemi, & a pick?
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:44 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 2,794
Quoting: CBJStats79
If you think they are basically the same player why make the trade? I just don’t think it’s enough coming to the CBJ. You can’t assume only on Kotkaniemi future play and Tatar’s contract isn’t long enough. Maybe Drouin, Kotkaniemi, & a pick?


I could have swapped Danault for KK but you wouldn’t be happy about that either. And yes, trading for future play is why you make trades. You are essentially trading expected performance at various points in the future. Domi for Anderson was trading expected future performance.
Jan. 22, 2021 at 5:53 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 394
Likes: 28
Quoting: jnowariak
I could have swapped Danault for KK but you wouldn’t be happy about that either. And yes, trading for future play is why you make trades. You are essentially trading expected performance at various points in the future. Domi for Anderson was trading expected future performance.


Yes. But they were RFA not UFA. Big difference. Both Danault and Tatar’s contracts are up. They are UFA. We can sign them in the summer. We don’t have to trade for them. You are just dumping them. Those are guys you give up at the trade deadline if you don’t make the playoffs to get picks or players. We get nothing out of this. This trade needs to work both ways.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll