SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Process Behind a Duncan Keith Trade

Created by: exo2769
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 2, 2021
Published: Jul. 2, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Considering the fact that Duncan Keith wants to go to the Pac NW... I actually see him waiving his NMC to be exposed to Seattle. If he's exposed...then this is a no brainer for Seattle to pick. Even at 37 he's better than Gaudette and DeHaan. So, this is the basis for any Keith trades. You need to definitively be better than nothing. AND the Hawks aren't retaining with this option either. You can also go the money route and if you're Seattle. He'd certainly be your captain and sell a lot of jerseys.

Edmonton Oilers
So, EDM seems to be the popular destination. I honestly have ZERO clue as to why though. It's a 12 hr drive to where his kids are in Vancouver. (I heard that's where his kids are...I don't honestly know that to be true)...so he's a flight away...which might as well be in Tampa then. I don't get it, but whatever...it's just a rumor.

So what would a trade proposal look like that definitively better than Zero. I.E. The Seattle expansion pick. I've read a few EDM blogs that was states Holland was likely to buyout at least one player this offseason due to cap constraints because EDM really needs scoring depth. With that said...this can actually help him kill multiple birds with lesser stones.
1.) Hard to find better playoff experience than Keith. Yes, playoff experience is still a big deal.
2.) Keith only costs $3.6M in salary over the next two years. Money does indeed still mean something to owners even if it doesn't on Capfriendly.
3.) Keith probably shouldn't play 23:25 ATOI anymore, but he really did lead the the Hawks in ice time yet again this year.
4.) Strome has played with McDavid in Erie
5.) Strome isn't not the best defensive forward, but he does score. Great vision and Net Front Presnece.
6.) I've retained 50% on Strome so $1.5M is a good price. AND he's still an RFA so you can even flip his rights if Holloway is just bursting at the seems to get more ice time the following year.
7.) Still have extra cap space to work with at the end of the trade.

Vanvoucer Canucks
I really don't think Vancouver is a good fit for a trade. On the one hand...they do have even more cap dumps than EDM. Tough to do, but VAN has bad players in spades. Loui, Rousell, Beagle, Holtby, AND even still guys like Ferland (even though LTIR) and Luongo is still having $3M in dead cap. So...even if the Hawks take on a lot of dumps...VAN isn't just one or two or three pieces away. VAN should just wait out the dumps and continue to develop their players/picks. I won't even suggest a pick below because it just doesn't fit.

Winnipeg Jets
There's a lot that goes into this trade AND this is a business. I know I'll get fandom comments, but the business side is real. The WPG Jets don't make money. They're a small market team and need to make business moves to survive. When you lose $7.6M PRE-COVID...you think out of the box. $1.85M per year for Keith...to bring home a native and get 20 ATOI is a big deal to the Jets organization. It's also helping to fill a void. Allow Ville time to develop properly. Take a game off if he needs to adjust the the full NHL schedule and time with coaches to mentally train to the NHL game.

https://www.forbes.com/nhl-valuations/list/#tab:overall
https://www.forbes.com/teams/winnipeg-jets/?sh=7a3b48d739e3

https://illegalcurve.com/latest-news-on-veteran-winnipeg-jets-centre-bryan-little/
https://theathletic.com/1997757/2020/08/17/bryan-littles-future-and-jets-salary-cap-tied-together-with-uncertainty/
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
3$2,000,000
2$1,250,000
2$1,000,000
2$2,000,000
5$4,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Neal, James
  3. 2021 1st round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Keith, Duncan
  2. Strome, Dylan ($1,500,000 retained)
2.
CHI
  1. Little, Bryan
  2. 2021 1st round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. Teplý, Michal
Additional Details:
Duncan Keith

Teply - Played for the Winnipeg Ice and when Krebs was hurt...he quietly scored 63 points in 53 games.
3.
CHI
    Expansion
    SEA
      Duncan Keith

      The most likely scenario in my opinion.
      Retained Salary Transactions
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2021
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the EDM
      Logo of the WPG
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the VGK
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the FLA
      2022
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the VGK
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      2023
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      22$81,500,000$66,380,881$452,439$5,082,500$15,119,119
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $6,400,000$6,400,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $10,500,000$10,500,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
      C, RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $3,700,000$3,700,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $2,625,000$2,625,000
      RW
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      LW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      C
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
      LW, C, RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      RW, LW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $3,850,000$3,850,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,350,000$1,350,000
      LD
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $850,000$850,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $4,000,000$4,000,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RD
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $800,000$800,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $4,550,000$4,550,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
      $5,291,667$5,291,667
      C, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $6,875,000$6,875,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $3,900,000$3,900,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Taxi Squad
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $3,500,000$3,500,000 ($2,375,000$2M$2,375,000$2M)
      RW, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
      $4,500,000$4,500,000 ($3,375,000$3M$3,375,000$3M)
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
      $750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:13 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2019
      Posts: 3,171
      Likes: 2,339
      Edited Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:19 p.m.
      80% of Little's salary is covered by insurance like most player contracts (100% payout, 20% premium so net 80%). No need for a cap dump, as the Jets can use the full cap hit of Little $5,291,667 ) to exceed the cap while only paying 20% of it ($1,058,333) which is cheaper than Keith's real salary. David Thomson, a co-owner of the Jets, is worth 45.9 billion USD. Does he want to lose money? No. Can they absorb it? Absolutely yes.

      Seattle makes the most sense.
      exo2769, Windjammer and Azura0055 liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:17 p.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2021
      Posts: 94
      Likes: 60
      I don't get where the EDM rumors come from either. I've been commenting on that matter all day long and I agree with you on Keith. I also think that the Oilers could look at him, if he's available and willing to come to EDM. I like your deal as well. I'm fine paying a 1st (it'll be a low/er 1st) if that means we're getting rid of Neal AND Koskinen. I'm not big on D. Strome but at 1,5 AAV he's more than fine and, like you said, he'll still be an RFA. If he has (gets back) chemistry with McJesus we even found our missing top 6 LW. If not he walks or gets flipped for cheap.
      exo2769 liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:18 p.m.
      #3
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Edited Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:25 p.m.
      Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
      80% of Little's salary is covered by insurance like most player contracts. No need for a cap dump, as the Jets can use the full cap hit of Little to exceed the cap while only paying 20% of it. David Thomson, a co-owner of the Jets, is worth 45.9 billion USD. Does he want to lose money? No. Can they absorb it? Absolutely yes.

      Seattle makes the most sense.


      Its's UP TO 80% I believe. I don't know how much specifically it will be for Little. With that said. 20% of his salary is still $3.9M...which is more than Keith's $3.6M AND still getting 20 min atoi.

      https://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/how-the-nhls-salary-cap-has-created-a-secondary-market-of-injured-players-and-costlycontracts/article36220762/#:~:text=Insurance%20sometimes%20covers%20up%20to,is%20the%20full%20original%20amount.

      As for the ownership goes. Unless you have the partnership agreement between Thomson and the other partners True North Sports and Entertainment...he might need to get approval to make moves. Businesses that own other businesses...don't typically go out and spend money. It's why Dundon bought out his partners in the Hurricanes recently. He's a swash buckling pirate and I love it!
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:24 p.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2019
      Posts: 3,171
      Likes: 2,339
      Quoting: exo2769
      Its's UP TO 80% I believe. I don't know how much specifically it will be for Little. With that said. 20% of his salary is still $3.9M...which is more than Keith's $3.6M AND still getting 20 min atoi.

      https://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/how-the-nhls-salary-cap-has-created-a-secondary-market-of-injured-players-and-costlycontracts/article36220762/#:~:text=Insurance%20sometimes%20covers%20up%20to,is%20the%20full%20original%20amount.


      E5KK8RVXIAAXFqM?format=jpg&name=large

      Like I said, the cap dump trade isn't necessary because of the benefit of exceeding the cap at a discount and the ability of ownership to absorb it. Also, Keith is nowhere near as good as he once was.

      Seattle makes the most sense.
      exo2769 liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:28 p.m.
      #5
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Quoting: Mr_Canoehead

      Like I said, the cap dump trade isn't necessary because of the benefit of exceeding the cap at a discount and the ability of ownership to absorb it. Also, Keith is nowhere near as good as he once was.

      Seattle makes the most sense.


      AND Like I said...you're over playing the Jets ability to "absorb" anything. There's a reason they don't go out and spend near the cap. Agreed on Seattle, but I think you're fandom is writing checks ownership won't do.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2019
      Posts: 3,171
      Likes: 2,339
      Quoting: exo2769
      AND Like I said...you're over playing the Jets ability to "absorb" anything. There's a reason they don't go out and spend near the cap. Agreed on Seattle, but I think you're fandom is writing checks ownership won't do.


      $45.9 billion dollar net worth of one owner.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:34 p.m.
      #7
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
      $45.9 billion dollar net worth of one owner.


      That's not the owner. It's True North Sports and Entertainment which is owned by Osmington Inc. and while Thomson owns Osmington and is certainly one of the board members...he doesn't get to act universally. That's why Dundon bought out all his partners.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:36 p.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 16,142
      Likes: 7,189
      Zero chance Winnipeg even looks at that deal.
      Mr_Canoehead liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:38 p.m.
      #9
      MisstheWhalers
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2019
      Posts: 23,789
      Likes: 12,446
      Quoting: exo2769
      AND Like I said...you're over playing the Jets ability to "absorb" anything. There's a reason they don't go out and spend near the cap. Agreed on Seattle, but I think you're fandom is writing checks ownership won't do.


      Haven't the Jets been spending to the cap or really close to it for quite a few years now?
      Mr_Canoehead and Windjammer liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:41 p.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2019
      Posts: 3,171
      Likes: 2,339
      Quoting: exo2769
      That's not the owner. It's True North Sports and Entertainment which is owned by Osmington Inc. and while Thomson owns Osmington and is certainly one of the board members...he doesn't get to act universally. That's why Dundon bought out all his partners.


      You're trying to sell your trade. I get it. TNSE owns the Jets and Megill Stephenson (Chipman) and Osmington (Thomson) own TNSE. If Thomson wants to write a personal cheque, the board isn't going to stop him because its a personal cheque.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:49 p.m.
      #11
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
      You're trying to sell your trade. I get it. TNSE owns the Jets and Megill Stephenson (Chipman) and Osmington (Thomson) own TNSE. If Thomson wants to write a personal cheque, the board isn't going to stop him because its a personal cheque.


      I mean yeah, You're right about that. I am trying to sell the trade. You're trying to sell the idea that Thomson is going to write a personal check for stuff. That's not how the world works, but ok. I guess Dubas could trade Matthews to Winnipeg for a 7th too.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:52 p.m.
      #12
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2019
      Posts: 3,171
      Likes: 2,339
      Quoting: exo2769
      I mean yeah, You're right about that. I am trying to sell the trade. You're trying to sell the idea that Thomson is going to write a personal check for stuff. That's not how the world works, but ok. I guess Dubas could trade Matthews to Winnipeg for a 7th too.


      Look you put alot of work in your sales job and you want internet validation. That's fine. Little's cap space is an asset and not an anchor and the insurance policy that most SPCs have are there to act as a cushion for these types of situations. Trading a first plus the cap space asset for a rapidly declining defender is absurd and trying to couch it as a major financial issue is laughable.
      Windjammer liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 1:58 p.m.
      #13
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 5,561
      Likes: 1,591
      Just by virtue of all the cap space they have, Seattle definitely makes the most sense as a landing spot via the expansion draft. The only wrinkle is that the Kraken will have a lot of decent Dmen to choose from around the league, whereas talent at forward will be harder to come by for them. If they think a guy like Gaudette (or another forward in his 20's) still has any kind of upside they might just go for that.
      Mr_Canoehead and exo2769 liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 2:18 p.m.
      #14
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Edited Jul. 2, 2021 at 2:23 p.m.
      Quoting: MisstheWhalers
      Haven't the Jets been spending to the cap or really close to it for quite a few years now?


      I guess it's all relative. Capfriendly goes back 6 years. Link below. There's obviously a lot more that goes into those numbers than face value. BUT the face value summary is below.

      15/16 - most cap available
      16/17 - 4th most
      17/18 - 10th most
      18/19 - 12th most
      19/20 - 8th most
      20/21 - LEAST cap available

      https://www.capfriendly.com/archive/2016
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 2:23 p.m.
      #15
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 16,142
      Likes: 7,189
      Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
      Look you put alot of work in your sales job and you want internet validation. That's fine. Little's cap space is an asset and not an anchor and the insurance policy that most SPCs have are there to act as a cushion for these types of situations. Trading a first plus the cap space asset for a rapidly declining defender is absurd and trying to couch it as a major financial issue is laughable.


      Yeah this thread reads as a hopeful fan dreaming of far fetched, highly illogical trade , completely unrealistic trade situations in which somehow by a miracle, Keith returns a first.
      Mr_Canoehead liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 2:25 p.m.
      #16
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Quoting: Windjammer
      Yeah this thread reads as a hopeful fan dreaming of far fetched, highly illogical trade , completely unrealistic trade situations in which somehow by a miracle, Keith returns a first.


      shakes head You're specifically the person I was referencing in the description about fandom not thinking logically about the business side of things. I find this a bit ironic.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 2:30 p.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 16,142
      Likes: 7,189
      Quoting: exo2769
      shakes head You're specifically the person I was referencing in the description about fandom not thinking logically about the business side of things. I find this a bit ironic.


      I thought you meant yourself when you wrote that. Only a fanboy as you come across here could think that there is even a one in a million shot you could pass this off as something logical that any rational team would think makes sense.squinty smile
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 2:39 p.m.
      #18
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Quoting: Windjammer
      I thought you meant yourself when you wrote that. Only a fanboy as you come across here could think that there is even a one in a million shot you could pass this off as something logical that any rational team would think makes sense.squinty smile


      Ah yes, the I'm rubber you're glue talk. Very adult of you. Considering you just come on here to tear down other people and not actually create ANY teams, nor contribute any support for your comments I think you know deep down that you're just the troll here.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 3:10 p.m.
      #19
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2020
      Posts: 16,142
      Likes: 7,189
      Edited Jul. 2, 2021 at 3:29 p.m.
      Quoting: exo2769
      Ah yes, the I'm rubber you're glue talk. Very adult of you. Considering you just come on here to tear down other people and not actually create ANY teams, nor contribute any support for your comments I think you know deep down that you're just the troll here.


      So, you're the one who makes the silly, unrealistic proposal. All posters including myself in this thread come here, offer our opinions as to why it doesn't make sense and all of us back up our opinions with facts and common sense. While your only support for your comment is "well it's my fantasy", but somehow I'm the one being unrealistic.

      Sounds like your feelings are hurt that no one thinks your Hawks fandom proposal makes even the slightest bit of sense. If you want more constructive responses try to put just the slightest thought into why the other tram would make the trade. Rather than the "this would be perfect for the Hawks" line of thinking.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 3:49 p.m.
      #20
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      Just by virtue of all the cap space they have, Seattle definitely makes the most sense as a landing spot via the expansion draft. The only wrinkle is that the Kraken will have a lot of decent Dmen to choose from around the league, whereas talent at forward will be harder to come by for them. If they think a guy like Gaudette (or another forward in his 20's) still has any kind of upside they might just go for that.


      You're 1,000% correct on this. Pending no other trades, Seattle can have Dumba, Graves, Dunn, Giordano, Dillon, Lauzon, Cernak. Those are all better options for sure. If Seattle doesn't take Keith...I think they look at Kampf to be honest. In admittedly a short stint...Gaudette has been invisible. I'm honestly starting to think VAN won the swap between Highmore and Gaudette. Only time will tell. If Seattle takes Gaudette/Kampf...I think the Hawks have a huge win on their hands. Just one man's opinion.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 4:11 p.m.
      #21
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2021
      Posts: 198
      Likes: 71
      I can’t see WPG trading Little for any reason. The contract is insured, LTIR remains an option, and the optics of trading a leader aren’t good.

      As for cap space. Winnipeg has always operated as a budget team. Do some research on some of the contracts the Jets have traded for over the years, where cap hit is higher than cash outlay. Cap space also accrues if a team doesn’t use LTIR. So from 2018 onwards, the cap space made it possible for Winnipeg to trade for assets at the deadline.

      On the ownership... Winnipeg does have the richest owner of a sports team based in Canada. Will this mean a blank cheque, not likely, but as a fan I wouldn’t worry about $$$ getting in the way of chasing a cup.

      As for Keith. He is a 3rd pairing D with great experience and on the last couple holes of his career. Even with a 50% salary retention, it makes zero sense to trade the 18th pick for a bottom pair D. You can sign one of those for league minimum. Is Keith better than a replacement level 3rd pair D, I think he is, but not worth a first. A 4th, maybe, at that point your picks are pretty risky, but not anything in the top 100 of a draft.
      Windjammer and exo2769 liked this.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 5:14 p.m.
      #22
      Thread Starter
      exo2769
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2015
      Posts: 15,835
      Likes: 10,044
      Edited Jul. 2, 2021 at 5:26 p.m.
      Quoting: Azura0055
      I can’t see WPG trading Little for any reason. The contract is insured, LTIR remains an option, and the optics of trading a leader aren’t good.

      As for cap space. Winnipeg has always operated as a budget team. Do some research on some of the contracts the Jets have traded for over the years, where cap hit is higher than cash outlay. Cap space also accrues if a team doesn’t use LTIR. So from 2018 onwards, the cap space made it possible for Winnipeg to trade for assets at the deadline.

      On the ownership... Winnipeg does have the richest owner of a sports team based in Canada. Will this mean a blank cheque, not likely, but as a fan I wouldn’t worry about $$$ getting in the way of chasing a cup.

      As for Keith. He is a 3rd pairing D with great experience and on the last couple holes of his career. Even with a 50% salary retention, it makes zero sense to trade the 18th pick for a bottom pair D. You can sign one of those for league minimum. Is Keith better than a replacement level 3rd pair D, I think he is, but not worth a first. A 4th, maybe, at that point your picks are pretty risky, but not anything in the top 100 of a draft.


      I agree with you that WPG has operated as a budget team. That's the biggest point I'm trying to make. I don't understand how people don't think they're a budget team. It doesn't matter how much money the owner has if it doesn't get spent. BUT I will also agree that winning a cup means more than any single contract.

      As for the "Little's contract is an asset" ok. Let's dig into that because 1% of that is accurate and 99% of that is simply misunderstood. Answer this... How much in draft capital are you willing to give up in order to have Shaw's contract all by itself? The correct answer is nothing. I wish teams lined up to take the contracts of Hossa/Shaw/Seabs/etc... It's just now how it works. Getting $5.3M in cap relief is better than an LTIR Bucket. So shedding his contract IS a good thing. We can factor in other parts, but just shedding the contract alone. 100% a good thing for WPG. As for optics. It's not like the Jets haven't traded away their captain at the TDL before. I'm sure it's not their preference, but trading away a contract for someone that might not ever play...that's not bad optics. Anyway...optics are subjective

      Paying $3.9M (or more) for Little's ZERO contribution vs $3.6M for 2 years of Keith is EXACTLY what you're saying WPG does. Take the higher cap hit and pay little money for REAL contributions on the ice. I feel like you're making my argument FOR me. Maybe the 1st is a bit high? ok. Maybe. BUT I still haven't heard a SOUND argument from any WPG side where this isn't EXACTLY who they'd target this summer. A Veteran with tons of playoff experience (Won the Conn Smythe). Won't cost much. Can play 20 ATOI easy. From WPG. AND you get to drop the cap dump. Teply isn't a slouch himself.
      Jul. 2, 2021 at 6:34 p.m.
      #23
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2021
      Posts: 198
      Likes: 71
      CapFriendly doesn’t model LTIR properly, they freely admit that. The cap relief from LTIR is the amount the team is ABOVE the cap when to contract is moved to LTIR. If a team is planning to operate as a cap team, and has other contracts that get them very close to the cap, then the team is able to use LTIR.

      Chevy has indicated that their contention window isn’t open now, and ownership is authorizing spending to the cap. That is exactly what they did in 20-21, so actions support the thesis that Winnipeg is currently a cap team.

      The benefit of moving Littles contract: they clear it off the books from a cap perspective and the non-insured 20% from a cash outflow perspective. This will enable WPG to spend close to the cap during the off-season, and the accumulate cap space during the season to add a rental later in the season.

      The cons: giving up an asset (LTIR eligible contract). There are other teams who could use this contract to get above the cap and maximize their own cap space. If it costs a hockey asset, then there is the disposition cost. Let’s ignore the optics, I think it matters to the team, you don’t so we will never agree on that con.

      On balance, the Jets can spend Little’s contract ABOVE the cap and then place him on LTIR. Let’s look at the scenarios with Keith:
      1) No salary retention. —> Keith then takes up $5.4M if cap room, which should be enough to sign UFA or acquire a TOP 4, younger D. In this scenario, why would the Jets give up ANY asset, let alone Little’s contract?
      2) 50% salary retention. Keith will count 2.7M against the cap. This is probably close to his value, if you weigh experience and leadership highly. What would the Jets give up for that when they can sign a $3M UFA for no asset cost? Chicago is competing against every $3M UFA dman. I’d argue that the Jets wouldn’t give up more than a late round pick.

      As for Little’s contract, you’ll notice I didn’t include that in the evaluation of either CHI trade scenario, why not, because the Jets don’t gain anything trading AWAY the Little contract, LTIR is a free move except for 20% of his cash contract. There is zero cap benefit.

      The fundamental assumption is the Jets will sign or trade for 2 Dmen. They won’t put themselves in a position to have to wait until February to strengthen their weakness by exceeding the cap through a trade.
      exo2769 liked this.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll