SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burns Packaged to WPG for Pionk and Acquiring Dvorak

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 6, 2021
Published: Aug. 6, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Burns is willing to waive to WPG to rejoin Dillon and DeMelo. WPG saves ~2mil in cap if Pionk gets 6mil with Burns replacing Pionk as the RH-shot.

This makes sense if WPG negotiations with Pionk, which have stalled, continue to stall and sour and Pionk doesn't like playing in WPG.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,000,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Pionk, Neal [RFA Rights]
2.
ARI
  1. Blichfeld, Joachim
  2. Kellman, Joel
  3. 2022 1st round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Top-5 Protected. Becomes unprotected next available SJ 1st if SJ picks inside Top-5 in 2022 draft.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$72,313,334$0$425,000$9,186,666

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,550,000$1,550,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$500,000$500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$796,667$796,667
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,175,000$2,175,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,108,696$2,108,696
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 6, 2021 at 5:21 p.m.
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
This makes no sense for the Sharks. Pack it in and rebuild.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 5:25 p.m.
#2
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,882
WPG trade is really bad for SJ, and Burns will never waive to move to Winnipeg.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 5:25 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 95
Likes: 21
It gonna lie, I’m not a big fan of the Burns deal. You could probably trade him to a team who would want him (he could still put up a decent couple of seasons) and not have to trade as much. You could probably get more for him than Pionk as well.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 5:47 p.m.
#4
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 926
Likes: 519
this is just terrible for SJ.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 5:57 p.m.
#5
Patient Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 926
Likes: 519
Quoting: GenXHockey
This makes no sense for the Sharks. Pack it in and rebuild.


How do we rebuild, genius? All you keyboard warriors here say "rebuild" but that is not possible with NMC and NTCs on high dollar contracts. So please, advise us on how this is possible.
JumboFett liked this.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 5:58 p.m.
#6
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,314
Likes: 4,488
Hard pass by Jets
Aug. 6, 2021 at 6:15 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 1,082
Where have u heard pionk doesn’t like playing in wpg
Aug. 6, 2021 at 6:16 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,975
Likes: 7,102
That is a trade that Winnipeg would never consider no matter how you try to rationalize it.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 7:19 p.m.
#9
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 932
Quoting: Cheddamonkey37
Where have u heard pionk doesn’t like playing in wpg


I think it's a WiFi issue.
GenXHockey liked this.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 8:02 p.m.
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: TravisBickle
How do we rebuild, genius? All you keyboard warriors here say "rebuild" but that is not possible with NMC and NTCs on high dollar contracts. So please, advise us on how this is possible.


I didn’t say retool I said rebuild, nothing wrong with keeping the old guys and moving who you can for futures. Couture, Hertl, Kane maybe Lebanc. Retain if you have to. Keep your prospects.

I’m sorry your team signed so many ****ty contracts but maybe look in the mirror before calling me a keyboard warrior.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 8:04 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 2,318
Quoting: goodfella
I think it's a WiFi issue.


Ah, so its just that Cheveldayoff can't connect with Pionk's agent on Zoom.
memehlers and goodfella liked this.
Aug. 6, 2021 at 8:41 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,662
Likes: 8,263
This isn't good for the jets, they would prefer Pionk over burns
IconicHawk liked this.
Aug. 7, 2021 at 1:17 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1,013
Basically SJ pays Pionk 10M for 4 yes and gives up prospects for the honor. NO!
Aug. 7, 2021 at 1:53 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 734
Quoting: vols94
Basically SJ pays Pionk 10M for 4 yes and gives up prospects for the honor. NO!

That's actually a pretty interesting way of looking at it. Good point -- completely agreed!
GenXHockey liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll