SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Its very simple

Created by: Pete
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 13, 2021
Published: Aug. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$78,260,674$1,956,507$125,000$3,239,326
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,675,000$3,675,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,375,000$2,375,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 13, 2021 at 6:56 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,637
Likes: 19,745
Coyle declines
Aug. 13, 2021 at 6:59 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,865
Likes: 8,869
Ya it is. Coyle has an NMC and does not waive for a dumpster fire.

And Zona declined Debrusk/Zboril for Dvorak.

They want a 1st and a prospect, otherwise they keep him.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 7:03 p.m.
#3
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 16,188
Likes: 20,503
Quoting: Gofnut999
And Zona declined Debrusk/Zboril for Dvorak.


Where did you see this?
Aug. 13, 2021 at 7:05 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Pete
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 162
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ya it is. Coyle has an NMC and does not waive for a dumpster fire.

And Zona declined Debrusk/Zboril for Dvorak.

They want a 1st and a prospect, otherwise they keep him.


Could anyone explain why Zona's approach has changed so drastically? Why are they suddenly reluctant to send Dvorak cheap after what they dealt with Canucks?
Aug. 13, 2021 at 7:09 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 795
Now you have to pay for Dvorak.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 7:11 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,510
Likes: 4,566
So trade Coyle to acquire a younger version of Coyle?
Pete liked this.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 7:16 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,865
Likes: 8,869
Edited Aug. 13, 2021 at 9:00 p.m.
Quoting: Pete
Could anyone explain why Zona's approach has changed so drastically? Why are they suddenly reluctant to send Dvorak cheap after what they dealt with Canucks?


That was to dump OEL’s contract.

Dvorak has trade value. They had to pay to get rid of OEL. They used Garland to do it and saved on payroll after this year significantly. It also pulled in the 1st after having to forfeit theirs and a 2nd next year. They have not given anyone away cheap, what they have done is stockpile draft picks to rebuild. Which is exactly what they want for Dvorak. They got a 1st and 2nd for Garland. They took 3 bad contracts that expire after this year to get rid of 6 years of OELs bad contract. If you call that cheap so be it, but nobody was paying to take OEL full 6 years at 8.25. They won that trade long term. It was addition by subtraction.
MisstheWhalers and KrispyBBQ liked this.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 7:26 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,865
Likes: 8,869
Quoting: SevenLeg
Where did you see this?


NHLTradeRumors so take it for what it’s worth.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 8:49 p.m.
#9
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,726
Likes: 12,403
Both Coyle and the Coyotes decline.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 8:49 p.m.
#10
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,726
Likes: 12,403
Both Coyle and the Coyotes decline.
KrispyBBQ liked this.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 9:13 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 241
Likes: 92
Quoting: Gofnut999
That was to dump OEL’s contract.

Dvorak has trade value. They had to pay to get rid of OEL. They used Garland to do it and saved on payroll after this year significantly. It also pulled in the 1st after having to forfeit theirs and a 2nd next year. They have not given anyone away cheap, what they have done is stockpile draft picks to rebuild. Which is exactly what they want for Dvorak. They got a 1st and 2nd for Garland. They took 3 bad contracts that expire after this year to get rid of 6 years of OELs bad contract. If you call that cheap so be it, but nobody was paying to take OEL full 6 years at 8.25. They won that trade long term. It was addition by subtraction.


Perfectly put. Canucks trade was a win win for both teams, and if anything , I would say tho Coyotes may have won by a little but not drastically.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 10:57 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Pete
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 162
Quoting: Gofnut999
That was to dump OEL’s contract.

Dvorak has trade value. They had to pay to get rid of OEL. They used Garland to do it and saved on payroll after this year significantly. It also pulled in the 1st after having to forfeit theirs and a 2nd next year. They have not given anyone away cheap, what they have done is stockpile draft picks to rebuild. Which is exactly what they want for Dvorak. They got a 1st and 2nd for Garland. They took 3 bad contracts that expire after this year to get rid of 6 years of OELs bad contract. If you call that cheap so be it, but nobody was paying to take OEL full 6 years at 8.25. They won that trade long term. It was addition by subtraction.


Thanks for precise explanation, Gofnut999. It definitely makes sense although I disagree with it's evaluation. For me was Garland their no. 1 forward and his move absolutely unacceptable. Also OEL could stay and move to the 2nd pairing. So my personal opinion on the trade.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 11:02 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,865
Likes: 8,869
Edited Aug. 13, 2021 at 11:11 p.m.
Quoting: Pete
Thanks for precise explanation, Gofnut999. It definitely makes sense although I disagree with it's evaluation. For me was Garland their no. 1 forward and his move absolutely unacceptable. Also OEL could stay and move to the 2nd pairing. So my personal opinion on the trade.


They did not want to pay Garland and he was not staying there. He wanted out and would leave via FA first chance he got. And he was not their top FW by any stretch. He was their #2 trade asset. And they used him to get rid of their #1 problem and got two high end picks. Solid deal.

They did not want OEL on the books, had nothing to do with his role. He had to go. His contract was an albatross that would be a detriment to them for years. You are thinking like a fan as opposed to a GM or businessman. Easy to do when it is not your $.

They were in financial mess and lost a lot of $ the last 2 years.
Aug. 13, 2021 at 11:25 p.m.
#14
Bedard23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 9,314
Likes: 4,488
Don’t ever question why Forbort was 2nd pairing in Winnipeg 😉
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll