SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Honestly this team is one piece away

Created by: EccE
Team: 2021-22 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 13, 2021
Published: Sep. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This team is one piece away from being a serious Cup contender. The only problem is that the piece needed might be the most expensive one to acquire - the mystical number 1C.

But if we were to get that, we'd be right up there with the Avalanches and Lightnings.

How far would you be willing to go to get that 1C?
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$9,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Number One, Center
1$6,942,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$82,128,088$0$732,500-$628,088
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
UFA - 5
Number One, Center
$6,942,000$6,942,000
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,100,000$3,100,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$725,000$725,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,125,000$1,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$850,000$850,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:09 a.m.
#1
LGRW
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 37
Likes: 14
The only solutions for this team to get a true 1C would be to either aquire Hertl via trade/fa or trade for Eichel and pay up extra to make BUF retain 2M in salary. Both options would force MIN to trade out Dumba and Rask, as well as give up loads of Futures. I would just trade Dumba and Talbot next offseason, and then rely on the youth.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:10 a.m.
#2
Connor
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 635
Rossi will be that in a couple years, no need to break the bank on one, unless it's eichel
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:12 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: hockeyconnor97
Rossi will be that in a couple years, no need to break the bank on one, unless it's eichel


I agree. If we are able to get Hertl/Eichel for relatively cheap, then sure, we'll do it. But we shouldn't give up assets of tomorrow just to fill a need today.
hockeyconnor97 liked this.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:13 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 798
if you think the wild or only a number 1 center away from tampa and colorado then you should go and look over their rosters. Yes the wild would be competitve if they add a number center (not getting what you need for a 6.9mil cap hit) but still not tampa or colorado.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:15 a.m.
#5
Bait Post Detector
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 362
Likes: 225
"we'd be right up there with the Avalanches and Lightnings."

That's a bit of a stretch, I like the Wild and the direction they're headed in but to compare them to the Lightning or the Aves is a bit of blind optimism
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:16 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
if you think the wild or only a number 1 center away from tampa and colorado then you should go and look over their rosters. Yes the wild would be competitve if they add a number center (not getting what you need for a 6.9mil cap hit) but still not tampa or colorado.


The cap hit is obviously a joke. But what comes to your claims, this squad woyld definitely be able to challenge Tampa. This team has more depth and does not lose too badly in star-power. Tampa is one hell of a team, but the back-to-back Cups glorify their players too much.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:23 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 798
Quoting: EccE
The cap hit is obviously a joke. But what comes to your claims, this squad woyld definitely be able to challenge Tampa. This team has more depth and does not lose too badly in star-power. Tampa is one hell of a team, but the back-to-back Cups glorify their players too much.


Conservatively tampa has3-4 players if not more that are better than anyone on this roster. They "arguably" have the best goalie in the league, plus the one of the top dman in the league. Like ya wild would be improved and moving in the right direction but come on, even if you want to compare them to the current tampa roster its still not close. Kaprizov has one year where he was just under a point a game player are you going to say thats your comparable to Kucherov?
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:27 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 188
Likes: 98
The Wild is the most appropriate team to acquire Eichel, problem is they would have to part with one of Rossi/Boldy, Dumba, Rask, maybe Kahkonen and a bag of valuable picks. I'd just wait for one of Rossi or Boldy to take the 1C role
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:31 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
Conservatively tampa has3-4 players if not more that are better than anyone on this roster. They "arguably" have the best goalie in the league, plus the one of the top dman in the league. Like ya wild would be improved and moving in the right direction but come on, even if you want to compare them to the current tampa roster its still not close. Kaprizov has one year where he was just under a point a game player are you going to say thats your comparable to Kucherov?


To clarify, I never said this team is BETTER than Tampa. I said they'd be up there WITH them. And yes, Tampa has an amazing top6, but their depth is basically non-existent.

This Wild team would have a different identity. While Tampa is a top-heavy, star-stuffed squad, this Wild team would be an unstoppable machine with no weaknesses.

Also, Kaprizov had 51 points more than Kucherov last year grin
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:32 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: Jupetto
The Wild is the most appropriate team to acquire Eichel, problem is they would have to part with one of Rossi/Boldy, Dumba, Rask, maybe Kahkonen and a bag of valuable picks. I'd just wait for one of Rossi or Boldy to take the 1C role


Boldy tried to play C in college and, quite frankly, sucked. He's better suitable to the wing. So I'd put my money on Rossi rather than him being our 1C
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:35 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 3,444
That one piece puts you way over the cap. And then there's next year where dead money becomes a big issue. Also, how much faith do you have in Talbot?

Not trying to be a downer, but I can't see how this team really becomes a contender in the next handful of years unless Rossi and Boldy are absolute studs from day one. Those buyouts are a killer.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:37 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
That one piece puts you way over the cap. And then there's next year where dead money becomes a big issue. Also, how much faith do you have in Talbot?

Not trying to be a downer, but I can't see how this team really becomes a contender in the next handful of years unless Rossi and Boldy are absolute studs from day one. Those buyouts are a killer.


Obviously some cap management is needed, I just wanted to see what the roster would look like with a true 1C. And the buyouts never were the problem - the contracts were. We would have those cap hits anyway, but the buyouts actually relieved that pain a bit.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:38 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,270
Likes: 7,131
That’s a big piece
Nhl_oilers liked this.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:42 a.m.
#14
Go leafs go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,318
Likes: 9,233
I mean, 60-70% of team become like the avalance or lightning if they add a free 1c. You are going to have to give up assets to get this 1c. Think along the lines Dumba+Rossi+1st+2nd.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:43 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,492
Likes: 9,121
Quoting: RobinBergdahl
The only solutions for this team to get a true 1C would be to either aquire Hertl via trade/fa or trade for Eichel and pay up extra to make BUF retain 2M in salary. Both options would force MIN to trade out Dumba and Rask, as well as give up loads of Futures. I would just trade Dumba and Talbot next offseason, and then rely on the youth.


“Pay up extra to make BUF retain 2M” do you know how much it would take to get BUF to eat $10M in cap over the next 5 years that isn’t happening.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:44 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,492
Likes: 9,121
Quoting: EccE
Obviously some cap management is needed, I just wanted to see what the roster would look like with a true 1C. And the buyouts never were the problem - the contracts were. We would have those cap hits anyway, but the buyouts actually relieved that pain a bit.


Cap management? Bill G made that just a tad more difficult with dead cap money over the next what 4 seasons?
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:47 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: Xqb15a
Cap management? Bill G made that just a tad more difficult with dead cap money over the next what 4 seasons?


Billy G had no choice. Fletcher screwed over us with the contracts in 2012. We would be paying 15 million to two pylons anyway. With the buyouts, we at least get relief this year + the next.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 9:55 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 798
Quoting: EccE
To clarify, I never said this team is BETTER than Tampa. I said they'd be up there WITH them. And yes, Tampa has an amazing top6, but their depth is basically non-existent.

This Wild team would have a different identity. While Tampa is a top-heavy, star-stuffed squad, this Wild team would be an unstoppable machine with no weaknesses.

Also, Kaprizov had 51 points more than Kucherov last year grin

Ya kap did and then Kucherov put up 32 in 23 playoff games. Hes hitting records that only Gretzky and Lemieux have touched.

no weaknesses but cam talbot is your starter? Wild could land eichel without touching any roster player (forgetting about the cap for this) and smart money is still on Tampa is a 7 game series., Goaltending is no where near their level, and Defensively wild are solid but Hedman is a different animal al together and tampa still has the edge there and their top 6 blows the wild outta the water. I understand some biased towards our own team but there needs to be a little realism in there.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
Ya kap did and then Kucherov put up 32 in 23 playoff games. Hes hitting records that only Gretzky and Lemieux have touched.

no weaknesses but cam talbot is your starter? Wild could land eichel without touching any roster player (forgetting about the cap for this) and smart money is still on Tampa is a 7 game series., Goaltending is no where near their level, and Defensively wild are solid but Hedman is a different animal al together and tampa still has the edge there and their top 6 blows the wild outta the water. I understand some biased towards our own team but there needs to be a little realism in there.


As I said, the Wild would be WITH the Bolts. The Bolts would probably still be the better team. I'm not arguing against that. With that said, this team would definitely have a legit shot at winning the Cup, although every run needs a bit of luck as well.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 4:44 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,492
Likes: 9,121
Quoting: EccE
Billy G had no choice. Fletcher screwed over us with the contracts in 2012. We would be paying 15 million to two pylons anyway. With the buyouts, we at least get relief this year + the next.


Suter wasn’t a pylon and the amount of cap relief was truth be told kinda negligible when you take into account they will be taking dead cap hits of $12M, $14M, $14M in future years, I’m just kinda curious how the owner signed off on it.
Sep. 13, 2021 at 5:24 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 1,269
Quoting: Xqb15a
Suter wasn’t a pylon and the amount of cap relief was truth be told kinda negligible when you take into account they will be taking dead cap hits of $12M, $14M, $14M in future years, I’m just kinda curious how the owner signed off on it.


Leipold actually embraced it. He wants nothing more than to bring a Cup to Minnesota and didn't see it being possible with Parise / Suter in town.

Sure, Suter wasn't a negative in his performance, but how many quality years does he really have anymore? He is almost 37 and his offence already dipped. The buyouts were
A) the cleanest way to handle Parise's/Suter's eventual departure from the team
B) a chance to set up a new culture, a new leadership core before our prospects come knocking on the doord if the NHL
C) a way to save money for this year and the next
D) kinda forced, thanks to Chuck Fletcher's amazing cap management

Overall, these buyouts were the right call. Yes, they hurt. But not as much as having Parise and Suter for 15 million for the next four seasons
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll