SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buffalo completes the rebuild

Created by: tvh_0703
Team: 2021-22 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 30, 2021
Published: Sep. 30, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,055,363
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Bellows, Kieffer$2,055,363
2022 3rd round pick
Trades
1.
2.
BUF
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Koskinen, Mikko
  3. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir ($3,750,000 retained)
3.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the STL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$66,077,877$113,916$850,000$15,422,123
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,800,000$2,800,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,250,000$2,250,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,055,363$2,055,363
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,900,000$2,900,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,822,764$2,822,764
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$825,000$825,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$750,000$750,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 30, 2021 at 4:30 p.m.
#1
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,304
Likes: 9,058
That Edmonton trade is a great way to kill Brobergs career, but other than that is fine. St. Louis fans wont like it though
A_K liked this.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 4:38 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,617
Likes: 6,169
No thanks from LA. I'd rather have Kupari than Olofsson.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 4:48 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
When you look at the oilers roster who do they need more tarasenko or kosk? I think it’s more likely smith will need help covering an 82 game season than oilers needing help scoring goals pretty sure that part is already well covered. Could take out broberg and the first oilers still have to decline it has nothing to do with value of assets it’s about what the team needs more currently that’s kosk.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:09 p.m.
#4
Pistol Pete
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 1,479
Edmonton doesn’t need a winger they need a goalie.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:36 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 142
Likes: 29
Quoting: Timmah007
When you look at the oilers roster who do they need more tarasenko or kosk? I think it’s more likely smith will need help covering an 82 game season than oilers needing help scoring goals pretty sure that part is already well covered. Could take out broberg and the first oilers still have to decline it has nothing to do with value of assets it’s about what the team needs more currently that’s kosk.


I agree Edmonton would need another goalie, but nothing is stopping them from trading for one. They'd save $0.75m in cap space with that trade and could then look for a goalie that's more capable than Koskinen or at least as capable and also cheaper. They could check in on goalies like Kahkonen, Vanacek (imo they should've made a play for either one before the expansion draft), Montembault, Korpisalo, etc. Washington gave up a 2nd to get Vanacek back, clearly they could have paid that.

Smith will be done soon and Koskinen won't cut it. Sooner or later they needed to trade Koskinen and find a better replacement. If they waive Stalock & Archibald, and make the trade I'm proposing then they'll still have $5.03m in cap space to find another goalie and take back salary, and their forwards will now be:
Hyman-McDavid-Puljujarvi
Foegele-Draisaitl-Tarasenko
Perlini-RNH-Yamamoto
Turris-Ryan-Kassian
(Shore, McLeod, Sceviour, Holloway, Marody, Benson, Lavoie)
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:37 p.m.
#6
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,782
Likes: 4,335
Quoting: Shibbal18
That Edmonton trade is a great way to kill Brobergs career, but other than that is fine. St. Louis fans wont like it though


Yeah I don't love it, but if the neck thing disappears I see no reason to bash the trade value. Just looking at the Blues team for the future though, losing Thomas and Neighbours and adding a 10m long-term forward makes it extremely hard to keep the band together. It probably means no more Perron, no more ROR, no more Kyrou, and the guys that would fill around Eichel just got traded away for him. Basically, the window becomes 2 years, and then the team painfully dissolves to nothing but bad immovable contracts and a star center. Would be a fun ride though, and you could trade Eichel in 2 yrs to trigger the rebuild, which would be peak irony.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:39 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 142
Likes: 29
Quoting: Zmach
Edmonton doesn’t need a winger they need a goalie.


That's on them. They had loads of opportunities before the expansion draft seeing as they were one of the only teams without a goalie worth protecting. They could have gotten any number of quality goalies for dirt cheap.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:40 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 838
Quoting: tvh_0703
I agree Edmonton would need another goalie, but nothing is stopping them from trading for one. They'd save $0.75m in cap space with that trade and could then look for a goalie that's more capable than Koskinen or at least as capable and also cheaper. They could check in on goalies like Kahkonen, Vanacek (imo they should've made a play for either one before the expansion draft), Montembault, Korpisalo, etc. Washington gave up a 2nd to get Vanacek back, clearly they could have paid that.

Smith will be done soon and Koskinen won't cut it. Sooner or later they needed to trade Koskinen and find a better replacement. If they waive Stalock & Archibald, and make the trade I'm proposing then they'll still have $5.03m in cap space to find another goalie and take back salary, and their forwards will now be:
Hyman-McDavid-Puljujarvi
Foegele-Draisaitl-Tarasenko
Perlini-RNH-Yamamoto
Turris-Ryan-Kassian
(Shore, McLeod, Sceviour, Holloway, Marody, Benson, Lavoie)


At the end of the day this forward roster can already score goals though. If the Oilers are going to look at trading a 1st and their best D prospect, they better be addressing their needs directly rather than adding to a position of strength.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:48 p.m.
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,700
Likes: 25,529
Kupari for Olofsson would be an acceptable trade, but we don't really need another LW. Los Angeles declines before even discussing how slanted towards the Sabres this offer is. You can make a colorable argument that Olofsson is worth Kupari plus the second (personally, I don't think so), but Quick >>> Dell and that doesn't even bring Thomas into the picture.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:57 p.m.
#10
Pistol Pete
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 1,479
Quoting: tvh_0703
That's on them. They had loads of opportunities before the expansion draft seeing as they were one of the only teams without a goalie worth protecting. They could have gotten any number of quality goalies for dirt cheap.


Koskinen’s 4.5 million prevented them from signing a goalie.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 5:57 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 142
Likes: 29
Quoting: A_K
Yeah I don't love it, but if the neck thing disappears I see no reason to bash the trade value. Just looking at the Blues team for the future though, losing Thomas and Neighbours and adding a 10m long-term forward makes it extremely hard to keep the band together. It probably means no more Perron, no more ROR, no more Kyrou, and the guys that would fill around Eichel just got traded away for him. Basically, the window becomes 2 years, and then the team painfully dissolves to nothing but bad immovable contracts and a star center. Would be a fun ride though, and you could trade Eichel in 2 yrs to trigger the rebuild, which would be peak irony.


With Eichel, Schenn, Buchnevich, Saad, Faulk, Krug, Parayko, and Binnington locked up long term, I don't expect it would prevent them from locking people up all that much. Likely lose Perron, but at 33 that might end up being better anyways since he could command more than he's worth. O'Reilly, Kyrou, Sundqvist, and Barbashev will need new contracts in 2 years, but the cap is also supposed to rise by $2m.

So $7m left in cap space (including current cap space after the trade) + their current contracts to sign those 4 players. That's enough to resign O'Reilly at $9m, Kyrou at $6m, Sundqvist at $4m, and Barbashev at $3m.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 6:00 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 142
Likes: 29
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Kupari for Olofsson would be an acceptable trade, but we don't really need another LW. Los Angeles declines before even discussing how slanted towards the Sabres this offer is. You can make a colorable argument that Olofsson is worth Kupari plus the second (personally, I don't think so), but Quick >>> Dell and that doesn't even bring Thomas into the picture.


My thoughts were Thomas + Kupari for Olofsson (maybe a pick instead of one of them is more fair). And Quick + 2nd for Dell considering if LA wants to be competitive in 2022-23 they'll need to rid themselves of Quick with Petersen starting his $5m contract.
Sep. 30, 2021 at 6:16 p.m.
#13
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,700
Likes: 25,529
Quoting: tvh_0703
My thoughts were Thomas + Kupari for Olofsson (maybe a pick instead of one of them is more fair). And Quick + 2nd for Dell considering if LA wants to be competitive in 2022-23 they'll need to rid themselves of Quick with Petersen starting his $5m contract.


We don't need to rid ourselves of Quick with Edler and Maatta coming off the books and Brown probably getting re-upped for one year at appreciably less than his current ticket. Plus, the simple truth is that Quick is better than Dell.
Oct. 1, 2021 at 12:02 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 562
Oilers easily decline
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll