Detroit has zero interest in Kerfoot. Or Dermott. Or Engvall. You can keep them all.

Kerfoot for a 4th is about even value wise but if Kerfoot to Detroit was going to happen it would've in the offseason.

The start of your description was definitely correct.

Sharks decline pretty easily here.

The third is to get rid of Mrazek, so what’s for Reimer? Need a add Quito make the sharks even consider that

Campbell will cost at least 5 mil AAV.

I'm assuming you'd trade Ritchie anywhere for a 6th, but it won't be Winnipeg. Winnipeg doesn't have the cap space for Ritchie this year and definitely wouldn't want to waste the cap space on him next year.

“Trade Mrazek for a better and healthier backup” still adds a pick going to Toronto…

Holy cow I read this trade wrong I thought it was Mrazek and a 3rd for Reimer. This is even worse than I thought

So we give you a 3rd to take a goalie who is injured all the time and makes 1.5M more for an additional year? I think not

I wont even get into the trades, but a roster of 20 with no cap space and with muzzin, simmonds and spezza a year older is almost laughable by itself.

Never mind the fact that your bottom 2 forward lines are still pants and if forsberg is a UFA, why's he signing for the same amount he makes now?

If anything by paying Campbell 4mil and signing forsberg for 6mil, you've made the cap problems worse (no money for depth, no money to upgrade the bottom 6 forwards)