No matter how many times you tell him, he just doesn't get it does he... (long sigh)
If Vegas is okay with making a trade, it is within the rules ... to late though, i made my protected list.
No it's not. Because there is a TRADE FREEZE. This mean NO TRADING for ALL TEAMS. There aren't any exceptions. Because if you can make a trade, then so can I, so then everybody can do it. But no the trade freeze applies to EVERYONE. Hope you understand now.
If Vegas is okay with making a trade, it is within the rules ... to late though, i made my protected list.
No it's not. Because there is a TRADE FREEZE. This mean NO TRADING for ALL TEAMS. There aren't any exceptions. Because if you can make a trade, then so can I, so then everybody can do it. But no the trade freeze applies to EVERYONE. Hope you understand now.
then why was everyone else breaking the rules before? anyway it doesn't matter. we don't have a trade. conversation ended.
In response to Rangersandislesfan commenting on my protection list... Since I acquired Bieksa through a trade, wouldn't that negate the NMC (as we really aren't playing with them regardless), thus allowing me to protect who I want? If the board responds and says no, then I lose a decent player in Edmundson. Would suck, but let me know
In response to Rangersandislesfan commenting on my protection list... Since I acquired Bieksa through a trade, wouldn't that negate the NMC (as we really aren't playing with them regardless), thus allowing me to protect who I want? If the board responds and says no, then I lose a decent player in Edmundson. Would suck, but let me know
According to the rules we agreed on, their is no waiving/negating of NMC's and the player's status in the Capfriendly Expansion Tool is their status in the game.
If they have an NMC in the CET, they must be protected.
please address rangers in my expansion draft thread. he has posted multiple times and hasn't listed his exposed players.
imo, we should plan on re-evaulating his position on the BOGs soon bc he cannot follow simple directions, that are bolded, on the top of the page.
We may need to have a new official Expansion thread because there are a lot of bad errors in the current thread. Lots of goofed up lists that need to be corrected
please address rangers in my expansion draft thread. he has posted multiple times and hasn't listed his exposed players.
imo, we should plan on re-evaulating his position on the BOGs soon bc he cannot follow simple directions, that are bolded, on the top of the page.
Also, Philly, is it ok if one of the board members starts the new Thread? That way we can have all the formatting correct and hopefully people will correctly post their lists this time.
why are teams allowed to re-do their protection lists? I thought that it was going to be last person would be subbed out for the player that must be protected.
why are teams allowed to re-do their protection lists? I thought that it was going to be last person would be subbed out for the player that must be protected.