Quoting: NHLfan10506
Forgot he signed extension in Philly. Hall and Patches work though.
Debrusk has limited value in a trade this size, is mostly a cap move. Studnicka is a tweener. Moore is full cap dump. And picks.
There are rentals that return more every year...I don't know whats so controversial here.
Hall would be a good example….if Hertl had won an MVP anytime in the last couple years.
Pacioretty would be a good example….if the return was actually big. No first rounder. One good, but flawed prospect (i get what he turned into, but thats not what his value was at time of trade), a 2nd, and a multi year cap dump.
In terms of this boston package, the first and the second top the vast majority of rental deals, even on the high end of things.
Debrusk for all of his slumps as still played at an 82 game pace of 22-22-44. That doesn’t suck, especially with his performance lately over the last six weeks or so. I think the absolute floor of his price is a second round pick.
Studnicka - man, i just don’t know what to say because I think its borderline criminal how the bruins have mismanaged him. In terms of value, probably not too much, which is a real shame. He’s played well at every level including the NHL, but its tough to tell a potential trade partner that he has value when they keep sending him down.
Moore is a pure cap dump, i think somewhat offset by studnicka.
That kind of return is absolutely not seen every year.
Hall got a good return, as a recent MVP winner, and even then it was a first, third, and three, “meh,” prospects.
It seems like a lot of Sharks fans keep on talking about how common it is, but can’t really give any examples.