SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Honest Post Here

Created by: exo2769
Team: 2021-22 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 11, 2022
Published: Mar. 11, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If you honestly truly want to know what a Mrazek to the Hawks trade looks like...Just go look at their history.

Brett Connolley...$3.5M...2.5 years left. Sound pretty familiar! Currently plays in the AHL...where Mrazek will go. It cost a 1st round prospect, and 2nd round prospect and a late pick. That's just to dump Mrazek. If you want MAF and CDH...it'll cost a lot more.

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/437858

You need two teams to say yes, and CHI isn't the team to be dumping Mrazek onto. CHI will appropriately charge you an arm and a leg. Go work something out with AZ. They took ladd for (2) 2nds and a 3rd.

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades?s=ladd
Trades
TOR
    Joey Anderson = Riley Stillman

    A guy that isn't getting the playing time he deserves because TOR is a really good team...just like Florida

    Steeves = Borgstrom - A sligthly older, but higher end talent that deserves NHL ice time.

    7th = 7th
    CHI
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2022
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2023
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2024
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$74,254,783$0$400,000$7,245,217
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,645,000$1,645,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $950,000$950,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $796,667$796,667
    LW, RW
    RFA - 3
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,350,000$1,350,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
    RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $894,167$894,167
    LD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,650,000$1,650,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 3

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 10:29 a.m.
    #1
    GM Blackhawks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2017
    Posts: 366
    Likes: 185
    The thing is, those players aren't equal and Bowmans gone. You're right, Hawks aren't the team for that cap dump
    exo2769, ChiHawk and Jeeerrd liked this.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 10:31 a.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    exo2769
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 15,714
    Likes: 9,877
    Quoting: realKyleDavidson
    The thing is, those players aren't equal and Bowmans gone. You're right, Hawks aren't the team for that cap dump


    They're pretty close, but true that Bowman's gone. What would you add/subtract to make it a yes for the Hawks.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 10:41 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 8,299
    Likes: 4,950
    Thank god Bowman is gone. I would be upset if we did this
    ChiHawk, exo2769 and Jeeerrd liked this.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 10:47 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    exo2769
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 15,714
    Likes: 9,877
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    Thank god Bowman is gone. I would be upset if we did this


    It's hard to predict the future, but are you upset with the return he got for Connolley? Stillman's pretty good imo. I'm trying to be fair to other team's prospects. I'm sure you've seen Steeves play a bunch at UND...he's pretty decent too.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 10:57 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2019
    Posts: 1,064
    Likes: 463
    Mrazek and Niemela for Jake Allen ?
    Clears 1.5M in cap space next year and 3.8M the year after. Better goalie, more reliable. Jake is a tandem goalie
    exo2769 liked this.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 11:00 a.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    exo2769
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 15,714
    Likes: 9,877
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    Mrazek and Niemela for Jake Allen ?
    Clears 1.5M in cap space next year and 3.8M the year after. Better goalie, more reliable. Jake is a tandem goalie


    Yeah, if MTL agrees then do it.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 11:03 a.m.
    #7
    we miss leo k
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2018
    Posts: 5,993
    Likes: 5,124
    i think arizona should only accept a Mrazek dump if they can make the conditions on one of the picks as confounding as they did with the Ladd 3rd rounder
    exo2769 liked this.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 11:10 a.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 5,618
    Likes: 2,764
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    Mrazek and Niemela for Jake Allen ?
    Clears 1.5M in cap space next year and 3.8M the year after. Better goalie, more reliable. Jake is a tandem goalie


    im not a toronto fan... but if they move niemela theyre idiots.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 11:17 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 8,299
    Likes: 4,950
    Quoting: exo2769
    It's hard to predict the future, but are you upset with the return he got for Connolley? Stillman's pretty good imo. I'm trying to be fair to other team's prospects. I'm sure you've seen Steeves play a bunch at UND...he's pretty decent too.


    I didn't like the connely trade in the moment and still don't like it. Never have been a fan of all the reclamation projects. Just get draft picks. Strome is the only reclimation project that has even remotley worked out for us, and to be honest, did we even win that trade? probably not
    realKyleDavidson liked this.
    Mar. 11, 2022 at 12:30 p.m.
    #10
    GM Blackhawks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2017
    Posts: 366
    Likes: 185
    Quoting: exo2769
    They're pretty close, but true that Bowman's gone. What would you add/subtract to make it a yes for the Hawks.


    Quoting: exo2769
    It's hard to predict the future, but are you upset with the return he got for Connolley? Stillman's pretty good imo. I'm trying to be fair to other team's prospects. I'm sure you've seen Steeves play a bunch at UND...he's pretty decent too.


    I'm against taking on bad money unless it's a one year deal. I'd rather use it in FA to sign and flip someone or be a salary broker at next years TDL. I like Stillman he's fine, but I don't see him being a top four guy and don't like the trade we made. We also threw in Carlsson who's looked better since the trade
    exo2769 and Jeeerrd liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll