SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ANA 2022-23 Starting lineup

Created by: JoeThorntonsBeard
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 30, 2022
Published: Mar. 30, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Anaheim Ducks Opening night roster 2022-23

- Sign Marchment to add grit and scoring to top 6
- Trade Gibson to add more future picks + Ceci to somewhat replace Manson
- Sign Chariot to replace Lindholm (more importantly to help reach cap floor)
- Bring in Korp on a prove-it deal
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$900,000
2$1,350,000
2$2,400,000
2$1,500,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,350,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$2,000,000
2$950,000
1$800,000
1$925,000
1$975,000
1$900,000
4$4,000,000
3$3,333,000
2$1,750,000
Trades
ANA
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. 2023 1st round pick (EDM)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NSH
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$53,290,917$0$4,200,000$29,209,083
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA - 1
$3,333,000$3,333,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$900,000$900,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 30, 2022 at 1:54 a.m.
#1
56 years and countin
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 173
I can't see Anahiem trading Gibson at all, he's the present and future goalie of that team but yeah the Marchment and Chiarot additions are nice.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 2:04 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Sir
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 254
Likes: 16
Quoting: PrisonMike
I can't see Anahiem trading Gibson at all, he's the present and future goalie of that team but yeah the Marchment and Chiarot additions are nice.


Gibson has not had over a 905% SVP over the last 3 years, but his value is still high, Trade him while you can. At this point he is replaceable. Also ANA will not be a contender for a few more years.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 4:08 a.m.
#3
LosPatos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1,885
This is satire right?
Mar. 30, 2022 at 4:48 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Sir
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 254
Likes: 16
Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
This is satire right?


tell me how?
Mar. 30, 2022 at 5:31 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 562
Oilers accept
Mar. 30, 2022 at 6:06 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,575
Likes: 11,958
Mason Marchment - I’m absolutely for it! I would say I want this as our ‘big’ off season signing if we could only get one

John Gibson - can’t see him being traded

Ben Chiarot - offer sheet Nicolas Hague instead
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 6:08 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,575
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: JoeThorntonsBeard
Gibson has not had over a 905% SVP over the last 3 years, but his value is still high, Trade him while you can. At this point he is replaceable. Also ANA will not be a contender for a few more years.


I don’t see Anaheim getting the return we would want for Gibson so I can’t see a trade happening

I also think we will be solid and starting to compete in 2 seasons (23/24)
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 6:44 a.m.
#8
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: JoeThorntonsBeard
tell me how?


So the 1st is to take on that awful Ceci contract, and the 3rd is for Gibson?

And yeah, I absolutely get that Gibson hasn't put up the numbers over the past couple of years, but given that they don't have any cap issues, I don't know why you'd sell super low on him.
OldNYIfan and GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 7:43 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 1,946
Verbeek isn't dumb enough to sign Chiarot to anything more than a 1x$1.5M deal.

I'd love Marchment.

Why would the Ducks take back Ceci? I'd prefer to play someone like Helleson.
OldNYIfan and GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 8:05 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,091
Likes: 7,772
Quoting: Lenny7
So the 1st is to take on that awful Ceci contract, and the 3rd is for Gibson?

And yeah, I absolutely get that Gibson hasn't put up the numbers over the past couple of years, but given that they don't have any cap issues, I don't know why you'd sell super low on him.

Ceci has positive value, he's been very good this year. Edmonton isn't trading their defacto 1RD AND a 1st for a cap dump of a goalie.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 8:09 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,091
Likes: 7,772
Quoting: GrinReaper
Oilers accept


No. Gibson is all reputation. Edmonton needs a goalie that can actually stop pucks and doesn't cost $6.4M for term.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 8:14 a.m.
#12
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: CD282
Ceci has positive value, he's been very good this year. Edmonton isn't trading their defacto 1RD AND a 1st for a cap dump of a goalie.


S'all good, you can keep him.
OldNYIfan and GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 8:32 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,091
Likes: 7,772
Quoting: Lenny7
S'all good, you can keep him.


Will do!
Mar. 30, 2022 at 8:34 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,091
Likes: 7,772
Quoting: PrisonMike
I can't see Anahiem trading Gibson at all, he's the present and future goalie of that team but yeah the Marchment and Chiarot additions are nice.


Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
This is satire right?


Quoting: GeneralLandro
Mason Marchment - I’m absolutely for it! I would say I want this as our ‘big’ off season signing if we could only get one

John Gibson - can’t see him being traded

Ben Chiarot - offer sheet Nicolas Hague instead


Quoting: Lenny7
So the 1st is to take on that awful Ceci contract, and the 3rd is for Gibson?

And yeah, I absolutely get that Gibson hasn't put up the numbers over the past couple of years, but given that they don't have any cap issues, I don't know why you'd sell super low on him.


Quoting: TZ11
Verbeek isn't dumb enough to sign Chiarot to anything more than a 1x$1.5M deal.

I'd love Marchment.

Why would the Ducks take back Ceci? I'd prefer to play someone like Helleson.

If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

@oldnyifan
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 9:53 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,575
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: CD282
If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

oldnyifan


I think Dostal becomes the full time starter/taxi squad guy next year and Stolarz gets delt at the deadline — Dostal becomes full time backup for a year or two after then takes over for Gibson

That’s what I think happens
OldNYIfan and Lenny7 liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 10:07 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 1,946
Quoting: CD282
If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

oldnyifan


They won't, there's just no reason to. He's amazing in the AHL at just 21 years old.
OldNYIfan and GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 10:25 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,091
Likes: 7,772
Quoting: TZ11
They won't, there's just no reason to. He's amazing in the AHL at just 21 years old.


He's blocked by Gibson for the next 5 years though.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 10:33 a.m.
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,550
Likes: 25,418
Quoting: CD282
If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

oldnyifan


The Ducks will move Dostal in for the 2023-2024 season. They won't trade him, but they might do as my friend @GeneralLandro says -- trade Stolarz at the trade deadline next year, or keep him through that season and let him go as a free agent.
GeneralLandro and TZ11 liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 10:45 a.m.
#19
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,550
Likes: 25,418
Quoting: JoeThorntonsBeard
Gibson has not had over a 905% SVP over the last 3 years, but his value is still high, Trade him while you can. At this point he is replaceable. Also ANA will not be a contender for a few more years.

It's a chicken-and-egg conundrum -- is Gibson bad because the team is bad, or is the team bad because Gibson is bad?

In the first half of the season, while the team was completely healthy, Gibson was 15-10-8 and was only one of nine starting goalies with a save rate over 92% and a GAA under 2.5, and the team was in a playoff spot. Since then, the team has stunk and Gibson's numbers have collapsed. But last night's game was typical -- Gibson made 29 saves on 32 shots, but some of those saves wouldn't have been made by at least half of the starting goalies in the NHL. And one game in the current string of ten consecutive losses the Ducks have suffered his save rate was 92.9%.

You can argue that his numbers aren't good, but numbers are just facts; facts aren't truth. I have no doubt that if Gibson played for Boston, say, his numbers would be better than their two goalies' numbers, and that Gibson will be our starting goaltender for at least the next three seasons.
Lenny7 and GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 11:22 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,575
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It's a chicken-and-egg conundrum -- is Gibson bad because the team is bad, or is the team bad because Gibson is bad?

In the first half of the season, while the team was completely healthy, Gibson was 15-10-8 and was only one of nine starting goalies with a save rate over 92% and a GAA under 2.5, and the team was in a playoff spot. Since then, the team has stunk and Gibson's numbers have collapsed. But last night's game was typical -- Gibson made 29 saves on 32 shots, but some of those saves wouldn't have been made by at least half of the starting goalies in the NHL. And one game in the current string of ten consecutive losses the Ducks have suffered his save rate was 92.9%.

You can argue that his numbers aren't good, but numbers are just facts; facts aren't truth. I have no doubt that if Gibson played for Boston, say, his numbers would be better than their two goalies' numbers, and that Gibson will be our starting goaltender for at least the next three seasons.


This is probably the ultimate Gibson take there could/is out there right now — it’s all spot on

My friend, another great job
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 11:28 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,091
Likes: 7,772
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It's a chicken-and-egg conundrum -- is Gibson bad because the team is bad, or is the team bad because Gibson is bad?

In the first half of the season, while the team was completely healthy, Gibson was 15-10-8 and was only one of nine starting goalies with a save rate over 92% and a GAA under 2.5, and the team was in a playoff spot. Since then, the team has stunk and Gibson's numbers have collapsed. But last night's game was typical -- Gibson made 29 saves on 32 shots, but some of those saves wouldn't have been made by at least half of the starting goalies in the NHL. And one game in the current string of ten consecutive losses the Ducks have suffered his save rate was 92.9%.

You can argue that his numbers aren't good, but numbers are just facts; facts aren't truth. I have no doubt that if Gibson played for Boston, say, his numbers would be better than their two goalies' numbers, and that Gibson will be our starting goaltender for at least the next three seasons.

He's allowed 3 or more goals in every single one of his last 15 starts. His GSAx over that span is -22.76!! You can't blame the team for that - not when Stolarz posted a GSAx of +2.23 in 7 games in the same span.

Here are their stats from the past 2 months:

Stolarz: 2-1-1, 2.44 GAA, .922 sv%
Gibson: 2-12-1, 4.61 GAA, .860 sv%

Stolarz hasn't had an easier ride, either:

Stolarz: 2.83 xGA/60, 9.59 HDSA/60, 3.14 Rush Attempts Against/60
Gibson: 2.89 xGA/60, 9.22 HDSA/60, 1.81 Rush Attempts Against/60

The Ducks season is in the toilet because they insist on starting Gibson when he's clearly struggling. That's not in the defense, that's on Gibson and Eakins.
Mar. 30, 2022 at 11:43 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 1,946
Quoting: CD282
He's blocked by Gibson for the next 5 years though.


Not really. Gibson could be traded in the future but just not right now and the Ducks might go 50/50 in terms of starts in a few years. But Dostal is definitely not being dealt.
OldNYIfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll