SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks Next Szn

Created by: PM616
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 12, 2022
Published: Jun. 12, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$975,000
1$1,000,000
3$3,500,000
3$2,550,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
2$875,000
1$900,000
1$1,200,000
5$6,250,000
4$3,750,000
1$3,750,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Der-Arguchintsev, Semyon
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
ANA
  1. 2022 7th round pick (MTL)
3.
ANA
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (OTT)
  2. 2024 6th round pick (OTT)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the MTL
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$54,311,250$0$4,282,500$28,188,750
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$855,000$855,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$875,000$875,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$822,500$822,500
G
RFA - 1
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$975,000$975,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 12, 2022 at 1:32 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Can you show me 1 player who had 3 terrible seasons in a row, while having a big contract with lots of term remaining on it, and fetched a premium price like Gibson is fetching here?
Jun. 12, 2022 at 2:10 a.m.
#2
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 921
leafs accept
Jun. 12, 2022 at 2:34 a.m.
#3
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr
Can you show me 1 player who had 3 terrible seasons in a row, while having a big contract with lots of term remaining on it, and fetched a premium price like Gibson is fetching here?


Seth Jones didn’t have the big contract with term left, he was given it but he was okay for 1 season than awful for the next 2
Jun. 12, 2022 at 2:44 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Quoting: Jah1722
Seth Jones didn’t have the big contract with term left, he was given it but he was okay for 1 season than awful for the next 2


Jones had 1 bad season, he was good enough to get Norris votes in each of the 4 previous to it including top 10 in 2 of them. Clearly not comparable to Gibson's performance these past years.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 3:31 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 105
Likes: 28
Quoting: Byrr
Jones had 1 bad season, he was good enough to get Norris votes in each of the 4 previous to it including top 10 in 2 of them. Clearly not comparable to Gibson's performance these past years.


I agree with you that Gibson has been pretty bad, but I do think a GM is gonna be dumb enough to pay a lot for him probably not as much as OP but still like at least a first. Oh and Jones did not deserve these Norris votes he was a good but not great defenceman he just played a bunch of minutes and had skills some old hockey men likes.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 4:08 a.m.
#6
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr
Jones had 1 bad season, he was good enough to get Norris votes in each of the 4 previous to it including top 10 in 2 of them. Clearly not comparable to Gibson's performance these past years.


Actually no he was about league average and then well below league average and then one of the worst players in the league the previous 3 season before his trade. We’re talking fancy stats right? Not league and media reputations? Because based off your assumption that this rather poor package for Gibson is a premium price that’s what I assumed.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 5:00 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Edited Jun. 12, 2022 at 6:10 a.m.
Quoting: Jah1722
Actually no he was about league average and then well below league average and then one of the worst players in the league the previous 3 season before his trade. We’re talking fancy stats right? Not league and media reputations? Because based off your assumption that this rather poor package for Gibson is a premium price that’s what I assumed.


Reputations or fancy stats, it doesn't matter because Gibson has neither left. Let's say Jones got it based off reputation since that makes sense. What's left of Gibson's? He hasn't received any Vezina votes in those seasons from GMs. No GMs were interested when he was shopped by Anaheim last season. He was ranked 24th amongst starter goaltenders by the writers before last season and since then 4 of those goalies above him had a better season.

The fact you are trying to expand the parameters to fit in a comparable shows just how unprecedented a return this would be for a player. Is it really reasonable to expect Gibson to fetch an unprecedented amount after 3 bad seasons with a bad contract going forward? Of course not. That's the reality of the situation the Ducks are in with him and says a lot to what his true value should be.

You liked Jones, so think what you'd expect Jones' return would be if he had his last season before being traded 3 times in a row with his current contract attached to it. That's GIbson and you'd be arguing they should be paying to move him.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 5:14 a.m.
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,510
Likes: 25,395
No reason for Anaheim to dump Comtois, Grant or Gibson for those piss-poor returns. And no reason to give a roster spot to Kulak or Subban at those prices.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 8:04 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,571
Likes: 11,955
Absolutely not to the Comtois trade and pass on the Palat Kulak and Subban signings
Jded liked this.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 8:31 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,506
Likes: 3,721
Regarding Gibson... there was a time when people like me were asking other people to look at SV% to evaluate goalies (instead of just the record and GAA, but now it seems that some people evaluate goalies too much with SV%

Of course it's not always easy to put "respectable numbers" on a rebuilding team

Quoting: GeneralLandro
Absolutely not to the Comtois trade and pass on the Palat Kulak and Subban signings


I was going to say that Comtois was not the type of player the Sens want/need to target but at that ridiculous price, why the hell not? Acquire then figure it all after, trade him back for more or trade another guy?
Jun. 12, 2022 at 8:51 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,571
Likes: 11,955
Quoting: Xspyrit
Regarding Gibson... there was a time when people like me were asking other people to look at SV% to evaluate goalies (instead of just the record and GAA, but now it seems that some people evaluate goalies too much with SV%

Of course it's not always easy to put "respectable numbers" on a rebuilding team



I was going to say that Comtois was not the type of player the Sens want/need to target but at that ridiculous price, why the hell not? Acquire then figure it all after, trade him back for more or trade another guy?


How does the Comtois deal make any sense at all for Anaheim though?
Jded liked this.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 9:01 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,506
Likes: 3,721
Quoting: GeneralLandro
How does the Comtois deal make any sense at all for Anaheim though?


It doesn't.

If the opposite fan say they don't need the player but would still make the deal, it's because there's something wrong lol

The logjam at forward will be crazy but I'd hope to get Comtois value up then trade him or another forward.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 1:28 p.m.
#13
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr
Reputations or fancy stats, it doesn't matter because Gibson has neither left. Let's say Jones got it based off reputation since that makes sense. What's left of Gibson's? He hasn't received any Vezina votes in those seasons from GMs. No GMs were interested when he was shopped by Anaheim last season. He was ranked 24th amongst starter goaltenders by the writers before last season and since then 4 of those goalies above him had a better season.

The fact you are trying to expand the parameters to fit in a comparable shows just how unprecedented a return this would be for a player. Is it really reasonable to expect Gibson to fetch an unprecedented amount after 3 bad seasons with a bad contract going forward? Of course not. That's the reality of the situation the Ducks are in with him and says a lot to what his true value should be.

You liked Jones, so think what you'd expect Jones' return would be if he had his last season before being traded 3 times in a row with his current contract attached to it. That's GIbson and you'd be arguing they should be paying to move him.


This is why you can’t debate Leaf fans, they pull out their own “facts”. He was never shopped. Writer rankings don’t mean much and when it comes to goalies it varies so much year to year.

I did like the Jones trade, I hate the blackhawks and they over paid for him because of league wide reputation. It was lovely to see.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 3:17 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 918
Maybe if Toronto feels desperate but that’s a lot for Gibby
Jun. 12, 2022 at 7:37 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Quoting: Jah1722
This is why you can’t debate Leaf fans, they pull out their own “facts”. He was never shopped. Writer rankings don’t mean much and when it comes to goalies it varies so much year to year.

I did like the Jones trade, I hate the blackhawks and they over paid for him because of league wide reputation. It was lovely to see.


I can understand why Ducks fans don't like facts when it comes to Gibson because none of them support him having a trade return.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 9:38 p.m.
#16
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr
I can understand why Ducks fans don't like facts when it comes to Gibson because none of them support him having a trade return.


You make up “facts” to try and support your case. He was never shopped.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 9:46 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Quoting: Jah1722
You make up “facts” to try and support your case. He was never shopped.


Not according to mainstream reporters.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 10:10 p.m.
#18
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr
Not according to mainstream reporters.


You should try listening/reading better, TOR has long asked about Gibson but it never went anywhere because he wasn’t being shopped.
Jun. 12, 2022 at 10:13 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Edited Jun. 12, 2022 at 10:24 p.m.
Quoting: Jah1722
You should try listening/reading better, TOR has long asked about Gibson but it never went anywhere because he wasn’t being shopped.


Has nothing to do with Toronto. It was reported that Ducks tried shopping him to all the teams who were in need of goaltenders. Edmonton, Washington, Toronto, etc. The facts remain, there is no reason Gibson would have value. It's so apparent, you haven't even tried making an argument for why he would.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 2:01 p.m.
#20
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr
Has nothing to do with Toronto. It was reported that Ducks tried shopping him to all the teams who were in need of goaltenders. Edmonton, Washington, Toronto, etc. The facts remain, there is no reason Gibson would have value. It's so apparent, you haven't even tried making an argument for why he would.


Let me know when you decide to provide actual facts instead of made up fallacy. Gibson has never been shopped.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 7:56 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Quoting: Jah1722
Let me know when you decide to provide actual facts instead of made up fallacy. Gibson has never been shopped.









Don't worry, I'm sure GIbson came out of no where to tell the team that. He definitely hasn't been asked about being traded by the team first.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 9:52 p.m.
#22
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr







Don't worry, I'm sure GIbson came out of no where to tell the team that. He definitely hasn't been asked about being traded by the team first.


It’s funny because he might be being shopped now but you claimed 31 teams didn’t want him when he was being shopped before, which never happened. This isn’t the “gotcha” you think it is. It only disproves your original point that no one wants him.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 10:00 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,289
Likes: 3,037
Quoting: Jah1722
It’s funny because he might be being shopped now but you claimed 31 teams didn’t want him when he was being shopped before, which never happened. This isn’t the “gotcha” you think it is. It only disproves your original point that no one wants him.


>post tweet of an american outlet saying he was available last season
>you somehow still think it didnt happen

Should I get a calendar to show you when March is? I mean I don't know where to go from here. At this point you are just being dense for the sake of it.
Jun. 13, 2022 at 10:10 p.m.
#24
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 2,899
Quoting: Byrr
>post tweet of an american outlet saying he was available last season
>you somehow still think it didnt happen

Should I get a calendar to show you when March is? I mean I don't know where to go from here. At this point you are just being dense for the sake of it.


Post tweets that said teams called because they were interested in acquiring Gibson. Do you even know what you are saying at this point? You claim no one wanted Gibson when he was being shopped and then post tweets that refute that point dramatically.

Let me help you out, “the ducks took calls” means teams inquired about Gibson which means teams are interested and that the ducks listened. The ducks listening doesn’t mean they were shopping Gibson. Rebuilding teams would be dumb not to listen whenever teams call about veteran players and that’s what happened.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll