SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

JT Miller

Created by: Richard88
Team: 2022-23 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 27, 2022
Published: Jun. 27, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This AGM is for 2022. Avs win another cup in 2022/23 and then the plan for the 2023 off-season would be a retool where JT Miller walks in UFA, and Toews gets traded for a young 2C. The D is again stacked for 2022/23 and then from 2023 on it would still be formidable with a top 4 of Byram-Makar and Girard-Manson.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
1$875,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
4$3,500,000
5$6,000,000
4$5,500,000
2$1,850,000
Trades
COL
  1. Miller, J.T. ($2,625,000 retained)
VAN
  1. Newhook, Alex
  2. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
Additional Details:
Basically Newhook + whatever futures get it done with the necessary retention.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$81,919,167$25,000$2,712,500$580,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
$1,850,000$1,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$800,000$800,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$875,000$875,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,500,000$5,500,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 4
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$987,500$987,500
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 3,930
Likes: 2,065
Would need to add a lot more. Unless Colorado is willing to go all in, I don't think there's a fit here
Goblues_Gocanucks liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:41 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,993
Likes: 3,484
Better to keep Newhook and acquire Miller in some other way if possible. Manson probably gets a better offer from Anaheim, and I wouldn't be surprised if he took it. Contender teams would also be interested in his services probably.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:47 p.m.
#3
retired
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 8,893
Likes: 4,761
fair price but i wouldnt go higher
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:49 p.m.
#4
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: GMBL
Better to keep Newhook and acquire Miller in some other way if possible. Manson probably gets a better offer from Anaheim, and I wouldn't be surprised if he took it. Contender teams would also be interested in his services probably.


I'd give Manson 3 x $4ish if I was the Ducks, but I don't think I'd be too keen on going wild with it. Proved that he was a valuable player during the playoffs, and I'd love to have him back, but I hope it's not something insane like 3-4 x $5.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:56 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,993
Likes: 3,484
Quoting: Lenny7
I'd give Manson 3 x $4ish if I was the Ducks, but I don't think I'd be too keen on going wild with it. Proved that he was a valuable player during the playoffs, and I'd love to have him back, but I hope it's not something insane like 3-4 x $5.


I think it will either be higher hit on a 3-year term, or they add 1 or 2 years to get the hit down. I'm assuming he will want more than 4.1m (since he kind of proved he still can be that guy that was paid that much). I don't see Shattenkirk in the teams long-term plans, so depends how deep the RD prospect pool is in Ana and how many are 3 or less years away.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:56 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,904
Likes: 6,402
That would definitely be a tempting offer
Prime_Jimbo liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 3:02 p.m.
#7
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,998
Likes: 24,659
Colorado shouldn’t do this
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 3:03 p.m.
#8
Lenny7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 13,291
Likes: 11,051
Quoting: GMBL
I think it will either be higher hit on a 3-year term, or they add 1 or 2 years to get the hit down. I'm assuming he will want more than 4.1m (since he kind of proved he still can be that guy that was paid that much). I don't see Shattenkirk in the teams long-term plans, so depends how deep the RD prospect pool is in Ana and how many are 3 or less years away.


Yeah...it's starting to look better in Anaheim on that end...Helleson needs some time-didn't look very solid in San Diego, but was also thrown into the mix when the team was competing for a playoff spot. Drysdale is looking better every day, and I'm hoping for big things in a year or two. I'd imagine we see a pick like Casey, Nelson, or one of the other similar RD's at either 22 OA or early in the 2nd, which would be 3-4 years away. It's honestly not like the Ducks couldn't use him, and I absolutely love him, I just hate the idea that Verbeek pulls a Drunk Bobby-type move and signs him long term when we all know that he's going to break down sooner rather than later. Extremely happy he won one with the Avs though-absolutely a fan fav. in Anaheim, and seeing him and Cogs win one felt nice.

As for Shatty? He had a solid year, but I'd imagine he's a deadline move this year.

My hope is that the Ducks use some of the draft/prospect capital that they've amassed, and make some high(er) end moves to raise the ceiling for this team. If they can do that, and add Manson as a complimentary piece, I'll be happy. Otherwise it's David Savard-2.0, which just seems like a waste for both parties.

And don't
GMBL liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 3:03 p.m.
#9
VAN
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 6,215
Likes: 1,900
Quoting: TheAlien
That would definitely be a tempting offer


It's definitely tempting. My only hesitation is the 1st will be the 32nd pick. Newhook, 1st + Olausson/another piece would make it more tempting given the salary retain. And to alleviate the pain when the Avs with JT Miller roll through Vancouver.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 3:09 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,993
Likes: 3,484
Quoting: Lenny7

My hope is that the Ducks use some of the draft/prospect capital that they've amassed, and make some high(er) end moves to raise the ceiling for this team. If they can do that, and add Manson as a complimentary piece, I'll be happy. Otherwise it's David Savard-2.0, which just seems like a waste for both parties.

And don't


Hopefully it doesn't turn to that, you guys do have the advantage in that both parties know what to expect.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll