SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks get better but still leave room for the future

Created by: Jphaxx
Team: 2022-23 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 14, 2022
Published: Jul. 15, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Ducks' signings of Strome and Vatrano make me think that the Ducks believe they are in a building phase. This opens the door to trading for veteran guys while continuing to stock pile assets for when they become more serious contenders.

The following trades have benefit for all parties and Ducks get to the floor while maintaining close to 18 mil to pickup more bad contracts for assets at the deadline.

I feel like the Nyquist trade could also be Bjorkstrand but without the same level of draft picks. Either way, it sucks for CBJ, but they need the room for Laine.

- couple depth defensement that can go to the AHL or stay up.

Let me know what you think
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,100,000
2$1,200,000
2$1,000,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Nyquist, Gustav
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (CBJ)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
helps to get Laine done, solves a need for an RHD
CBJ
  1. Shattenkirk, Kevin ($1,950,000 retained)
Additional Details:
%50 retention to help out so they can get Laine done.
2.
ANA
  1. Petry, Jeff
Additional Details:
- Petry gets to be in the US
- GMKH doesn't have to retain salary
MTL
  1. Grant, Derek
  2. Groulx, Benoit-Olivier
  3. 2025 7th round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
- Ducks get an RD to help bring the young guys along
- Give MTL a decent prospect that could become similar to Danault.
- Grant gives them a roster player for now that is a good 4th line/PK.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$53,376,667$0$4,200,000$29,123,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,037,500$2,037,500
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,295,000$1,295,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$425,000$425,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 15, 2022 at 5:57 p.m.
#1
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 4,290
Keep Shattenkirk. Tragically, we filled the RD issue with Gudbranson.
Ajp_18 and benjgc liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 5:59 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 76
Likes: 30
Haha, they seem really excited about him. When he was with the Ducks, I really liked him. I think you'll like him too... just don't pay attention to his contract.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:01 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Columbus isn’t going to dumb their best two way forward (Bjorkstrand), if they are going to pay to dumb someone it’ll be Voracek or Nyquist.
benjgc liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:04 p.m.
#4
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 4,290
Quoting: Jphaxx
Haha, they seem really excited about him. When he was with the Ducks, I really liked him. I think you'll like him too... just don't pay attention to his contract.


Oh, yeah. I have no issues with the player himself. He probably is a perfect fit. But that contract is appalling, especially since like two hours after it was signed, they found themselves in cap hell.
benjgc and Jphaxx liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:23 p.m.
#5
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 1,236
Nice to see an original trade proposal for petry, do you have RD prospect on the same level ? Habs don't need another prospect in that position TBH
Jphaxx liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:23 p.m.
#6
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 4,340
Quoting: Ajp_18
Columbus isn’t going to dumb their best two way forward (Bjorkstrand), if they are going to pay to dumb someone it’ll be Voracek or Nyquist.


Looks like he changed it to Nyquist.

I think there'd be something here. I'd counter by taking out one of the picks and adding Bean to the trade. ANA gets a young, cheap, controllable puck-moving D, CBJ get the cap-clearing space, and a one-year RD stop-gap to help hold things over until Jiricek is ready to give the NHL a try.
Jphaxx, Ajp_18 and benjgc liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:30 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 76
Likes: 30
Quoting: SMH
Nice to see an original trade proposal for petry, do you have RD prospect on the same level ? Habs don't need another prospect in that position TBH


That's one thing is that I don't actually know what MTL is looking for. They seem to have had a good offseason. The two things I based this trade off of was 1) Petry wants to be in the US and 2) Kent Hughes doesn't want to retain or give up assets to move the player. Ducks have some good D prospects (Helleson, Andersson, etc). BO Groulx is a two way center that I feel could help MTL this year or next and Derek Grant for sure can help now.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:32 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 76
Likes: 30
Quoting: dopplsan
Looks like he changed it to Nyquist.

I think there'd be something here. I'd counter by taking out one of the picks and adding Bean to the trade. ANA gets a young, cheap, controllable puck-moving D, CBJ get the cap-clearing space, and a one-year RD stop-gap to help hold things over until Jiricek is ready to give the NHL a try.


I think Anaheim would be good with that:
Nyquist, 3rd and Bean

for

Shattenkirk (%50 retained)
3rd rd pick, either year is fine
dopplsan liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:33 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 76
Likes: 30
Quoting: Ajp_18
Columbus isn’t going to dumb their best two way forward (Bjorkstrand), if they are going to pay to dumb someone it’ll be Voracek or Nyquist.


I think Nyquist is the more logical choice due to age and term left on the contract that both parties would be comfortable with. I think either way, it stings CBJ, but they did just get Johnny Hockey to soften that
Ajp_18 liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 6:39 p.m.
#10
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 1,236
Quoting: Jphaxx
That's one thing is that I don't actually know what MTL is looking for. They seem to have had a good offseason. The two things I based this trade off of was 1) Petry wants to be in the US and 2) Kent Hughes doesn't want to retain or give up assets to move the player. Ducks have some good D prospects (Helleson, Andersson, etc). BO Groulx is a two way center that I feel could help MTL this year or next and Derek Grant for sure can help now.


Habs current C depth is
Suzuki
Dach
Dvorak
Evans
Poehling

So they definitely don't need another bottem 6 defensive C , they also have currently 13 F so they don't need a winger as well, the only thing they need is another good RD prospect (hughes also said the habs won't have a problem with keeping petry if the right price isn't there, yes they'll need to shed salary but that's for the future so its not a move they have to make) i think habs will want ian moore and helleson
Jphaxx liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 7:29 p.m.
#11
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 2,896
Ducks just keep Shattenkirk for one season instead of paying Petry for 3 until he’s 37.
CHAR liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 7:41 p.m.
#12
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 4,340
Quoting: Jphaxx
I think Anaheim would be good with that:
Nyquist, 3rd and Bean

for

Shattenkirk (%50 retained)
3rd rd pick, either year is fine


Year doesn’t matter to me, either.

Either way. Pleasure doing business 🤝
benjgc and Jphaxx liked this.
Jul. 15, 2022 at 9:16 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,410
Likes: 11,796
Ducks pass on both deals no doubt
CHAR liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll