SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

sandin

Created by: xercuses
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 11, 2022
Published: Aug. 11, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Now these are kinda rough estimites of trades and really have no idea if the LA trade works but i think it could given cap and circumstance
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Roy, Matt
  2. Walker, Sean
Additional Details:
They have the cap to sign Durzi Sandin and Anderson now
LAK
  1. Sandin, Rasmus [RFA Rights]
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (OTT)
2.
TOR
  1. 2023 5th round pick (SEA)
3.
TOR
  1. Mahura, Josh
Additional Details:
He doesnt fit the timeline but he could be a good teacher for the young guys and helps fill out their left side which is rough
Also with him i think Ducks maybe fight for a playoff spot
ANA
  1. Muzzin, Jake
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$82,129,783$212,500$0$370,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$827,500$827,500
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,650,000$2,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:06 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Isles5513
I get ur point. I just think ur asking price is too high.


Thats our point. The Ducks get to set the price and if other teams dont like it they wont get under the cap ceiling

There is 0 reason to take a cap hit just because
OldNYIfan and gmurrayt liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:06 p.m.
#27
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
The Ducks are rebuilding, they dont need to make a move for the sake of it.

The teams above the cap NEED to move cap out, ANA has no reason to add cap for the rest of the offseason, keeping the team how it is and getting a legitimate shot at Bedard/Fantilli/Michkov is what will be best for ANA

Cap space is without doubt the most valuable asset in the NHL right now, look at how many teams are above the cap and will need to dump Salary, now look at how many teams can afford to add on big salary. and then consider players that have trade protection which can eliminate those teams

Ducks (and other teams with cap space) hold all the cards


Well if you can’t take advantage of that cap space to acquire assets then what is it really worth?
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:06 p.m.
#28
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
Thats our point. The Ducks get to set the price and if other teams dont like it they wont get under the cap ceiling


I’m just not sure ur right about how much leverage you have. Your asking prices imply you have a gun up to Kyle Dubas’s head lmao. 🤷‍♂️
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:07 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Isles5513
Well if you can’t take advantage of that cap space to acquire assets then what is it really worth?


Do you not understand thats my whole stance

to take full advantage of cap space and get the absolute most possible
OldNYIfan and gmurrayt liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:08 p.m.
#30
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
Do you not understand thats my whole stance

to take full advantage of cap space and get the absolute most possible


No I understand ur point. I’m saying that I don’t think u can get what ur asking for and if u hold out too long u could end up getting nothing 🤷‍♂️
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:08 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Isles5513
I’m just not sure ur right about how much leverage you have. Your asking prices imply you have a gun up to Kyle Dubas’s head lmao. 🤷‍♂️


5 teams in the NHL have leverage in a deal for any cap hit over 4.5M ANA, ARI, BUF, CHI and DET

Any other team in the league has 0 leverage in a deal like this

It isnt debatable its just a fact. Look at the cap space teams need to clear and look at the teams with room for it, the evidence is in the numbers
OldNYIfan and gmurrayt liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:09 p.m.
#32
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 6,680
Quoting: Isles5513
I get ur point. I just think ur asking price is too high.


It's the cost of cap mismanagement and keeping Stanley cup dreams alive. Or Toronto can flush another year of Matthes and Marners contracts down the drain with another first round exit, and Tavares isn't getting any younger either.

Either way, Anaheim is fine to stay the course we are on, we have LD that need the ice time to continue their development that we would much rather play. I think Dubas is going to find himself up **** creek if he tries to wait until the preseason to make his decision.
Salzy, OldNYIfan and gmurrayt liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:09 p.m.
#33
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
Do you not understand thats my whole stance

to take full advantage of cap space and get the absolute most possible


Maybe you can take on one year contracts for a 2nd. Outside of that I don’t c u getting what u want for multiyear deals.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:09 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 44
Likes: 26
Quoting: Salzy
5 teams can afford Muzzin without sending cap back
Dont see him waiving for ARI or CHI
That leaves ANA, BUF and DET

Gonna have to pay to move him without taking cap back and it wont be cheap to any of those 3 teams, especially with 2 being in-division for the Leafs

1st ++ attached to Muzzin or ANA hangs up


You seriously think it's a 1st plus a bunch of additional assets to get someone to take Muzz? When has there ever been that much sent as part of a "cap dump"?

Muzzin's decline has been fairly overblown (which is SHOCKING since nothing is ever exaggerated about Leafs players...). He was injured for a fair bit of last season, and certainly has slowed down a bit, but he had a strong playoffs, and only has 2 years left on a reasonable hit for a likely top 4 defenseman. For example, a team just willingly signed Gudbranson for 4 x $4mil and he's a much lesser player. Teams value the type of game Muzzin brings.

Do I think the Leafs will get much or any return for him? No, probably not. It's possible it's even a Pacioretty-style trade where it's just future considerations coming back. Cap space is scarce and player values are inextricably linked to their contract at this point. But a 1st rounder + a bunch of assets just to get someone to take Muzzin is absurd.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:09 p.m.
#35
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Isles5513
No I understand ur point. I’m saying that I don’t think u can get what ur asking for and if u hold out too long u could end up getting nothing 🤷‍♂️


If TOR/NYI etc hold out to long there wont be teams with cap space

The Ducks dont need to make a trade, teams over the cap are the ones on a clock
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:11 p.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: c_thompson
You seriously think it's a 1st plus a bunch of additional assets to get someone to take Muzz? When has there ever been that much sent as part of a "cap dump"?

Muzzin's decline has been fairly overblown (which is SHOCKING since nothing is ever exaggerated about Leafs players...). He was injured for a fair bit of last season, and certainly has slowed down a bit, but he had a strong playoffs, and only has 2 years left on a reasonable hit for a likely top 4 defenseman. For example, a team just willingly signed Gudbranson for 4 x $4mil and he's a much lesser player. Teams value the type of game Muzzin brings.

Do I think the Leafs will get much or any return for him? No, probably not. It's possible it's even a Pacioretty-style trade where it's just future considerations coming back. Cap space is scarce and player values are inextricably linked to their contract at this point. But a 1st rounder + a bunch of assets just to get someone to take Muzzin is absurd.


5 teams can afford Muzzin without sending cap back
Dont see him waiving for ARI or CHI
That leaves ANA, BUF and DET

When has there ever been a global pandemic that froze the cap and greatly cut into revenue?

The Leafs dont have a shred of leverage if they decide to move Muzzin, Even Muzzin himself has more leverage than TOR with his trade protection

Not saying the Leafs should do it, but why does ANA for any less

Patches was different completely and isnt even remotely comparable. CAR is a Stanley Cup contender, all the teams that can take on Muzzin at this point are rebuilding
OldNYIfan and gmurrayt liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:13 p.m.
#37
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
It's the cost of cap mismanagement and keeping Stanley cup dreams alive. Or Toronto can flush another year of Matthes and Marners contracts down the drain with another first round exit, and Tavares isn't getting any younger either.

Either way, Anaheim is fine to stay the course we are on, we have LD that need the ice time to continue their development that we would much rather play. I think Dubas is going to find himself up **** creek if he tries to wait until the preseason to make his decision.


Dubas is a lame duck GM at this point imo
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:13 p.m.
#38
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
If TOR/NYI etc hold out to long there wont be teams with cap space

The Ducks dont need to make a trade, teams over the cap are the ones on a clock


Both teams have assets with value. There is less talent available league wide than there is cap space. Not saying Muzzin is the guy u want to take, but it’s a good draft so that’s not a bad offer.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:15 p.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Isles5513
Both teams have assets with value. There is less talent available league wide than there is cap space. Not saying Muzzin is the guy u want to take, but it’s a good draft so that’s not a bad offer.


Not bad but why wouldnt you as a GM hold out as long as possible to get more

ANA could start the season with their current roster and be perfectly happy

Teams over the cap have a limited amount of time (and trade partners) to get under the ceiling
OldNYIfan and gmurrayt liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:16 p.m.
#40
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
If TOR/NYI etc hold out to long there wont be teams with cap space

The Ducks dont need to make a trade, teams over the cap are the ones on a clock


Not sure ur right about that. Isles aren’t under pressure to do anything unless the Kadri rumors r true and I’m not sure they could move ten million in salary anyway and remain competitive.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:16 p.m.
#41
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
Not bad but why wouldnt you as a GM hold out as long as possible to get more

ANA could start the season with their current roster and be perfectly happy

Teams over the cap have a limited amount of time (and trade partners) to get under the ceiling


I don’t think I’ve ever seen or ever will c an NHL Gm move a first to dump a productive player. In Muzzin’s case he is an injury risk tho so I get it.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:17 p.m.
#42
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 44
Likes: 26
Quoting: Salzy
5 teams can afford Muzzin without sending cap back
Dont see him waiving for ARI or CHI
That leaves ANA, BUF and DET

When has there ever been a global pandemic that froze the cap and greatly cut into revenue?

The Leafs dont have a shred of leverage if they decide to move Muzzin, Even Muzzin himself has more leverage than TOR with his trade protection

Not saying the Leafs should do it, but why does ANA for any less

Patches was different completely and isnt even remotely comparable. CAR is a Stanley Cup contender, all the teams that can take on Muzzin at this point are rebuilding


Right, but Toronto also just doesn't have to move Muzzin. They don't need leverage since they don't need to trade him. If Anaheim is asking for like a 1st + a top prospect, that's obviously a non-starter. The Leafs have a full roster, Sandin will likely make less than $2mil, and they really only need to move someone in the Kerfoot-range. There's absolutely no need to make the trade you've suggested.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:17 p.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: Isles5513
I don’t think I’ve ever seen or ever will c an NHL Gm move a first to dump a productive player. In Muzzin’s case he is an injury risk tho so I get it.


Dubas dumping a 1st to move Marleau?
OldNYIfan and vikhodush liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:18 p.m.
#44
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: Salzy
Dubas dumping a 1st to move Marleau?


Marleau wasn’t productive
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:19 p.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 5,946
Quoting: c_thompson
Right, but Toronto also just doesn't have to move Muzzin. They don't need leverage since they don't need to trade him. If Anaheim is asking for like a 1st + a top prospect, that's obviously a non-starter. The Leafs have a full roster, Sandin will likely make less than $2mil, and they really only need to move someone in the Kerfoot-range. There's absolutely no need to make the trade you've suggested.


Then they dont move muzzin, and ANA could care less

Wasnt suggesting any trade, was saying ANA doesnt take on Muzzin without some serious compensation

Ive been saying all offseason it doesnt make sense for the Leafs

But im talking from a Ducks perspective
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:20 p.m.
#46
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,373
Likes: 25,281
Quoting: Isles5513
How much will Roy command on his next deal? And how long will he be under contract? Selling high and getting Sandin should make them better long term.


You keep ignoring the key point here. The issue isn't between whether to acquire Sandin or not -- the answer to that would be Yes. The issue is whether to acquire Sandin at the cost of losing Roy. The answer to that is (a) certainly not in the short run, and (b) questionable in the long run, because Sandin is not a prospect on the level of, say, Power or Hughes or even Jake Sanderson. On balance, that adds up to No.

Also highly suspicious here (i.e., adding to doubt about value) is the fact that Sandin hasn't re-signed yet. If we take him on and it turns out his demand is higher than Mikey Anderson's or Sean Durzi's, we will have made a terrible, horrible, no-good, horrible mistake.
Not_Isles5513 liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:21 p.m.
#47
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,550
Likes: 6,145
Hard no from LA.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:22 p.m.
#48
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 11,744
Likes: 4,803
Quoting: OldNYIfan
You keep ignoring the key point here. The issue isn't between whether to acquire Sandin or not -- the answer to that would be Yes. The issue is whether to acquire Sandin at the cost of losing Roy. The answer to that is (a) certainly not in the short run, and (b) questionable in the long run, because Sandin is not a prospect on the level of, say, Power or Hughes or even Jake Sanderson. On balance, that adds up to No.

Also highly suspicious here (i.e., adding to doubt about value) is the fact that Sandin hasn't re-signed yet. If we take him on and it turns out his demand is higher than Mikey Anderson's or Sean Durzi's, we will have made a terrible, horrible, no-good, horrible mistake.


I agree 110% in that regard and wish I had mentioned it in my original comment
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:23 p.m.
#49
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 44
Likes: 26
Quoting: Salzy
Then they dont move muzzin, and ANA could care less

Wasnt suggesting any trade, was saying ANA doesnt take on Muzzin without some serious compensation

Ive been saying all offseason it doesnt make sense for the Leafs

But im talking from a Ducks perspective


I kind of think a Muzzin trade just doesn't happen now. They (the Leafs) will go into the season probably with 7D assuming Sandin signs. I could see a Muzzin move happening later if Gio still has enough to play third pair and Sandin/Lily progress as hoped. By the deadline it's possible teams that are contending experience their own injuries to a top 4 guy, or a team making a surprise run wants to add. Cap hits become a fair bit more palatable when the cap space is pro-rated near the deadline.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:27 p.m.
#50
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,373
Likes: 25,281
Edited Aug. 11, 2022 at 2:33 p.m.. Reason: corrected error
Quoting: c_thompson
You seriously think it's a 1st plus a bunch of additional assets to get someone to take Muzz? When has there ever been that much sent as part of a "cap dump"?

When has there ever been a player of Max Pacioretty's quality not just traded for Future Considerations but with the sweetener of an A prospect RhD thrown in?

Citing the absence of precedent in an unprecedented environment isn't a very compelling argument. (Not that I think we'll get a first plus for Muzzin -- I think that's overboard -- but that my friend @Salzy is right in thinking that there's no motive for us to do anything without an incentive.)
Salzy and GiggywithGibby liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll