SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

WHY NOT

Created by: DALI
Published: Sep. 6, 2022 at 5:40 p.m.
Salary Cap: $82,500,000
Season Days: 186/186 (100%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the upper limit has been exceeded by one of the trade parties

Logo of the Columbus Blue JacketsColumbus Blue Jackets

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Nyquist, GustavColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$5,500,000011---0000--
Ceulemans, CorsonColumbus Blue JacketsReserve List-$0001---------
Johnson, KentWaivers ExemptColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$925,000011---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Robertson, JasonDallas StarsNHL-$0011---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$416,6672442603712
Change$6,425,000-1-2-2000
Final$6,841,667 (↑)23 (↓)40 (↓)58 (↓)3712000

Logo of the Dallas StarsDallas Stars

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Robertson, JasonDallas StarsNHL-$0011---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Nyquist, GustavColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$5,500,000011---0000--
Ceulemans, CorsonColumbus Blue JacketsReserve List-$0001---------
Johnson, KentWaivers ExemptColumbus Blue JacketsNHL-$925,000011---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$6,335,8342244603511
Change-$6,425,000122000
Final-$89,166 (↓)23 (↑)46 (↑)62 (↑)3511000
Sep. 6, 2022 at 5:43 p.m.
#1
Civil_Eng_PE
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 783
Likes: 948
We would only do this for Hintz. We have too many wingers as is
DALI liked this.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 6:11 p.m.
#2
GeneralLandro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,917
Likes: 12,249
why not? because Dallas says no
EsoYeezus69, MoxNix and TheMooterus liked this.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 7:11 p.m.
#3
PantsOffnJacket
Fire J.D. too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 914
Quoting: GeneralLandro
why not? because Dallas says no


Thank God. Jackets don't need him and Johnson is too exciting to let go
Sep. 6, 2022 at 7:25 p.m.
#4
BJ_Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 962
Likes: 787
Quoting: PantsOffnJacket
Thank God. Jackets don't need him and Johnson is too exciting to let go


were we made for each other?
PantsOffnJacket liked this.
Sep. 6, 2022 at 8:16 p.m.
#5
EsoYeezus69
Jinx god
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,205
Likes: 13,730
Cuz Dallas says no, prospects are nice, but Robertson is much more proven and will likely be better than both.

If I was CBJ I’d hang on to Johnson considering they don’t have many centres in the pipeline, and he’s their young stud . Him and Silinger will be a great 1 2 in 5 years of now.
MoxNix, Dutchies and RobbinGoods liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll