SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Simple Swap

Created by: MSZUDY21
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 26, 2022
Published: Oct. 26, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$77,017,913$212,500$0$5,482,087

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$796,667$796,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$840,630$840,630
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,800,000$1,800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 26, 2022 at 3:42 p.m.
#1
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,734
Likes: 3,601
RFA RHD vs UFA Winger not simple
palhal liked this.
Oct. 26, 2022 at 3:46 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,540
Likes: 5,033
Now keep adding to the Toronto side
Oct. 26, 2022 at 3:48 p.m.
#3
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 8,667
Likes: 3,484
Canes will take a first for Toronto dumping Engvall and acquiring Bear.
Oct. 26, 2022 at 3:49 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
How does that help Canes? No need for Engvall at all.

Just give them the mid round pick.
Oct. 26, 2022 at 4:05 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 1,319
Edited Oct. 26, 2022 at 7:18 p.m.
Pretty fair trade. Cap hits are almost identical. Canes get a useful defensive bottom 6 forward. Toronto gets a bottom pair dman that can battle Holl for a spot in the lineup and at the very least re-allocates the money to shore up a position of need.

I imagine Carolina tries to waive Bear first though if they can't find a deal that clears the cap hit.
MSZUDY21 liked this.
Oct. 27, 2022 at 11:12 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 17
Likes: 4
I think the 1 for 1 trade is a good deal, but to get it done you need to find a team to retain salary on Bear in exchange for a player occupying one of the Leafs 50 contracts. This approach gives Leafs more flexibility saving $1M at the same time. Carolina gets rid of a player not in the line up.
MSZUDY21 liked this.
Oct. 27, 2022 at 2:15 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
MSzudy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 15
Quoting: Caniac555
RFA RHD vs UFA Winger not simple


Quoting: Caniac2000
Now keep adding to the Toronto side


Quoting: evelutions2
Canes will take a first for Toronto dumping Engvall and acquiring Bear.


Bear is not playing as the canes have a surplus of defense. They have identical caps hits. Canes are not getting a 1st for a healthy scratch that was a 5th rd pick to begin with. Might as well get a serviceable bottom six forward who can play center, penalty kill and scored 15 goals last year.
Mediumyeet liked this.
Oct. 27, 2022 at 2:19 p.m.
#8
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,734
Likes: 3,601
I’m actually pretty shocked about the proliferation of this concept that healthy scratches = player value. It ignores situation completely. Additionally, I wouldn’t expect a 1st for Bear, but in the right situation I see no reason why a projected low 2nd or early 3rd isn’t a return.

I like Engvall TBH - but you trade a controlled asset for a bottom 6 forward who the Canes likely have to put on waivers or healthy scratch too. It’s not good asset management.

Canes have 4-5 forwards playing in Chicago that are waiver exempt they could bring up to play bottom 6 mins if necessary.

It’s just not a good trade situationally.

Quoting: MSZUDY21
Bear is not playing as the canes have a surplus of defense. They have identical caps hits. Canes are not getting a 1st for a healthy scratch that was a 5th rd pick to begin with. Might as well get a serviceable bottom six forward who can play center, penalty kill and scored 15 goals last year.
evelutions2 and MSZUDY21 liked this.
Oct. 28, 2022 at 5:12 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
MSzudy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 374
Likes: 15
Quoting: Caniac555
I’m actually pretty shocked about the proliferation of this concept that healthy scratches = player value. It ignores situation completely. Additionally, I wouldn’t expect a 1st for Bear, but in the right situation I see no reason why a projected low 2nd or early 3rd isn’t a return.

I like Engvall TBH - but you trade a controlled asset for a bottom 6 forward who the Canes likely have to put on waivers or healthy scratch too. It’s not good asset management.

Canes have 4-5 forwards playing in Chicago that are waiver exempt they could bring up to play bottom 6 mins if necessary.

It’s just not a good trade situationally.


I respect that logic. Maybe I'd be willing to add a 3rd Rd pick or a mid level prospect to that deal.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll