SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buyer Sellers

Created by: dtd_tank
Team: 2022-23 Detroit Red Wings
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 15, 2023
Published: Feb. 15, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Probably unrealistic. Oh well.
Trades
1.
DET
  1. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
Additional Details:
Approximately 27oa.
CAR
  1. Vrána, Jakub ($2,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Assumes Vrana picks his scoring back up where he left it.
2.
DET
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
Approximately 25oa. Engvall is for cap space.
TOR
  1. Perron, David
Additional Details:
Perron adds an element that TOR could really use in the playoffs.
3.
DET
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (PIT)
PIT
  1. Kubalik, Dominik
  2. 2024 4th round pick (DAL)
4.
SJS
  1. Fabbri, Robby
  2. Viro, Eemil
  3. 2023 1st round pick (TOR)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (DET)
Additional Details:
Top 2 protection on 2023 1st (becomes 2024 DET 1st if top 2)
Top 12 protection on 2025 1st (becomes 2026 DET 1st if top 12)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the DET
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the STL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2024
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2025
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$64,326,389$0$3,857,500$18,173,611
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,375,000$2,375,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,460,000$1,460,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,825,000$1,825,000
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$878,333$878,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, C
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,750,000$4,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:01 p.m.
#1
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 34,962
Likes: 21,259
sure
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:02 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Pens decline. They already moved on from Kubalik. He wasn't a fit.
dtd_tank liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:02 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,829
Likes: 5,217
You want a first for a dude that cleared waivers? Please stop it. Even retained, I wouldn't give up more than a 5th ish. Keep him.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 3,562
With conditions and assuming this is closer to TDL I’d entertain that on canes end. Conditions around GP likely though.
dtd_tank liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:06 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 866
Quoting: Caniac2000
You want a first for a dude that cleared waivers? Please stop it. Even retained, I wouldn't give up more than a 5th ish. Keep him.


Such a bad take.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:08 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Caniac2000
You want a first for a dude that cleared waivers? Please stop it. Even retained, I wouldn't give up more than a 5th ish. Keep him.


Do you understand why he cleared waivers?
dtd_tank and IDKtbh liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:11 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: dtd_tank
Such a bad take.


Terrible take. What I will say is this, you guys are in a sticky predicament with Vrana. He's most definitely considered a high-risk player right now given everything he's gone through with his personal issues, injuries, etc... He's finally found some footing in the AHL, which is a positive sign, but he's still a risk at the moment, so I think a 1st is a big stretch.

I think a 2nd with 50% retention would be perfectly fair for any team. Personally, I think you're better served by letting him finish the season. If he comes around and returns to form, you'd get a killing for him in the off-season.
dtd_tank, IDKtbh and vikhodush liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:12 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,829
Likes: 5,217
Quoting: dtd_tank
Such a bad take.


You are entitled to your wrong opinion.
itsawrapppp liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:13 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,829
Likes: 5,217
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Do you understand why he cleared waivers?


Who cares? That doesn't change his value. Any team could have had him for absolutely free and rejected the chance. I know he's got his own issues, I hope he gets through them, that doesn't change the situation
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:14 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Caniac2000
Who cares? That doesn't change his value. Any team could have had him for absolutely free and rejected the chance. I know he's got his own issues, I hope he gets through them, that doesn't change the situation


What do you mean who cares? You used that as part of your argument. So you're saying your argument was crap?

He has $5.25M cap hit. How many teams do you think can just scoop up a player with that size of a hit?
dtd_tank and IDKtbh liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:17 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,829
Likes: 5,217
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
What do you mean who cares? You used that as part of your argument. So you're saying your argument was crap?

He has $5.25M cap hit. How many teams do you think can just scoop up a player with that size of a hit?


A team that put Max Pacioretty on LTIR and has more than 10 mil to spend? Are you saying you don't understand the argument? That's your mistake, not mine. If it's an issue with understanding, I can only reiterate. He just cleared waivers. If any team wanted him, they could have claimed him and made space for him. No team is going to part with a 1st to do that instead. Even if it saves 3 million, you could have dealt someone to make the money work. He's not worth it. The cap hit is not an excuse here.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:20 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Caniac2000
A team that put Max Pacioretty on LTIR and has more than 10 mil to spend? Are you saying you don't understand the argument? That's your mistake, not mine. If it's an issue with understanding, I can only reiterate. He just cleared waivers. If any team wanted him, they could have claimed him and made space for him. No team is going to part with a 1st to do that instead. Even if it saves 3 million, you could have dealt someone to make the money work. He's not worth it. The cap hit is not an excuse here.


First off, I'm not saying he's not a risk, but you're acting the dude is radiation.

Vrana was placed on waivers January 4th I believe. Pac didn't go back on LTIR permanently until after that, so your timing is off.

Do your homework, big boy.
IDKtbh liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:23 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 3,837
You are getting Meier without edvinsson coming the other way
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:30 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 866
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Terrible take. What I will say is this, you guys are in a sticky predicament with Vrana. He's most definitely considered a high-risk player right now given everything he's gone through with his personal issues, injuries, etc... He's finally found some footing in the AHL, which is a positive sign, but he's still a risk at the moment, so I think a 1st is a big stretch.

I think a 2nd with 50% retention would be perfectly fair for any team. Personally, I think you're better served by letting him finish the season. If he comes around and returns to form, you'd get a killing for him in the off-season.


Oh, I totally agree. I *really* want to keep Vrana. I just can't keep that mentality and set myself up for failure.

When people say "you don't expect the Yzerplan," it's 100% true. So I'm just going to set my expectations low (i.e. Vrana will be off the team) and hope for the best (Vrana stays and goes back to scoring in abundance).
Mr_Gardoki liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:31 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,785
Likes: 3,076
canes wont do that. pass.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:36 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,829
Likes: 5,217
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
First off, I'm not saying he's not a risk, but you're acting the dude is radiation.

Vrana was placed on waivers January 4th I believe. Pac didn't go back on LTIR permanently until after that, so your timing is off.

Do your homework, big boy.


Pacioretty had been hurt already, and they had the ability to make the paper move if they wanted to. He wasn't moved to LTIR until recently, but if they wanted Vrana, they could have had him for free.

"Do your homework, big boy"
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:39 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Caniac2000
Pacioretty had been hurt already, and they had the ability to make the paper move if they wanted to. He wasn't moved to LTIR until recently, but if they wanted Vrana, they could have had him for free.

"Do your homework, big boy"


Except Pac wasn't expected to miss the whole season, so you can't take on salary when you expect the player to come back. Not how the LTIR works.
dtd_tank liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:42 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,785
Likes: 3,076
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Except Pac wasn't expected to miss the whole season, so you can't take on salary when you expect the player to come back. Not how the LTIR works.


arguing with that poster is really unnecessary. he doesnt do his research and make outlandish claims.

either way. Paying a first for a project doesnt make much sense. We are a paying undervalue for projects type team. Our best assets will be used to bring in a big talent.
Mr_Gardoki and dtd_tank liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:43 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: ecupirate07
arguing with that poster is really unnecessary. he doesnt do his research and make outlandish claims.

either way. Paying a first for a project doesnt make much sense. We are a paying undervalue for projects type team. Our best assets will be used to bring in a big talent.


Yeah, regardless I think you guys are better served by letting him find his game back at the NHL level and waiting until the off-season to re-evaluate.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:45 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 9,785
Likes: 3,076
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Yeah, regardless I think you guys are better served by letting him find his game back at the NHL level and waiting until the off-season to re-evaluate.


if detroit is letting him go for pennies on the dollar the Canes would likely take that risk. if not, we likely go find a better deal elsewhere.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:46 p.m.
#21
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 7,764
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Terrible take. What I will say is this, you guys are in a sticky predicament with Vrana. He's most definitely considered a high-risk player right now given everything he's gone through with his personal issues, injuries, etc... He's finally found some footing in the AHL, which is a positive sign, but he's still a risk at the moment, so I think a 1st is a big stretch.

I think a 2nd with 50% retention would be perfectly fair for any team. Personally, I think you're better served by letting him finish the season. If he comes around and returns to form, you'd get a killing for him in the off-season.


I'd just keep Vrana. If he returns to scoring every other game (40 goal pace with Red Wings) then he's worth much more than a waiver pickup. But trading Vrana on CFACGM is a waste of time because all people remember is that he cleared waivers. Like the Billy Joe Jim Bob knucklehead from Carolina.

And why did Vrana clear waivers? Because he hadn't even skated in 3 months and was nowhere near hockey shape. CFACGM is a comical place. Bertuzzi has basically been called a horrible player with low trade value yet he's always in the top 6 of Leafs CFACGM's.

Vrana apparently has zero value yet he's always on CFACGM geniuses first line. As I said, I'd just keep the guy. Red Wings biggest weakness is finishing scoring chances. What does Vrana do very well? He finishes scoring chances.
dtd_tank and Mr_Gardoki liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:49 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: MoreHitzSeider
I'd just keep Vrana. If he returns to scoring every other game (40 goal pace with Red Wings) then he's worth much more than a waiver pickup. But trading Vrana on CFACGM is a waste of time because all people remember is that he cleared waivers. Like the Billy Joe Jim Bob knucklehead from Carolina.

And why did Vrana clear waivers? Because he hadn't even skated in 3 months and was nowhere near hockey shape. CFACGM is a comical place. Bertuzzi has basically been called a horrible player with low trade value yet he's always in the top 6 of Leafs CFACGM's.

Vrana apparently has zero value yet he's always on CFACGM geniuses first line. As I said, I'd just keep the guy. Red Wings biggest weakness is finishing scoring chances. What does Vrana do very well? He finishes scoring chances.


There's lots of logical reasons why he cleared. Billy Joe Jim Bob is just out of his element in understanding how the NHL works. And yes, I agree, as I said above, you're better served by letting him finish the season. It's not like you guys are in a rush this year. Plus, Yzerman is very calculated. He doesn't make desperation moves.
dtd_tank liked this.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:49 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 866
To be fair, and in retrospect, I would probably prefer to revert the Vrana trade, play him 3rd line (Ras - Veleno - Vrana), keep Soda in GR, and run a 4th line of Engvall - Suter - Zadina.
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:52 p.m.
#24
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 7,764
Quoting: dtd_tank
To be fair, and in retrospect, I would probably prefer to revert the Vrana trade, play him 3rd line (Ras - Veleno - Vrana), keep Soda in GR, and run a 4th line of Engvall - Suter - Zadina.


I'm boycotting remaining Red Wings games this season if I have to watch that god damned giraffe neck Engvall in a Red Wings uniform. He can F right off and use his giraffe neck to eat high foliage above the scoreboard somewhere else. Veleno's giraffe neck is more than enough for me.

We're not Avatar for F sakes!
Feb. 15, 2023 at 2:57 p.m.
#25
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 7,764
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
There's lots of logical reasons why he cleared. Billy Joe Jim Bob is just out of his element in understanding how the NHL works. And yes, I agree, as I said above, you're better served by letting him finish the season. It's not like you guys are in a rush this year. Plus, Yzerman is very calculated. He doesn't make desperation moves.


Stevie definitely plays the long game and Red Wings fans never really know what he's up to because he leaks nothing. It's a nice change from Ken Holland who would always use his press dummies to tell Red Wings what to think.

I still remember Helene St. James saying how losing Marian Hossa to UFA was a good thing. "Holland had to earmark 3 mil to Jiri Hudler."

Uh, no he didn't. Holland should've dropped off Hudler at the daycare and re-signed Marian Hossa.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll