SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kane duh

Created by: BDAvs
Team: 2022-23 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 19, 2023
Published: Feb. 19, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$72,806,667$25,000$2,500,000$9,693,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
-$2,625,000-$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$987,500$987,500
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:31 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
I’m actually shocked this is coming from an Avs poster. This is really bad for Colorado. Kane isn’t the player he used to be. You’re trading away from the Avs area of positional weakness (Center) and adding a 1st? Madness
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:32 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,372
Likes: 2,239
CHI should take that and RUN. What an overpay!!
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:33 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
BDAvs
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 330
Likes: 49
Quoting: turtlemountain
I’m actually shocked this is coming from an Avs poster. This is really bad for Colorado. Kane isn’t the player he used to be. You’re trading away from the Avs area of positional weakness (Center) and adding a 1st? Madness


I was being nice. Agreed it’s a bit much. But Newhook isn’t the answer.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:35 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,372
Likes: 2,239
Quoting: BDAvs
I was being nice. Agreed it’s a bit much. But Newhook isn’t the answer.


Even if he isn't the answer for the Avs, he's more than worth renting Kane now.
NMAvsFan, MeetYourMakar and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:37 p.m.
#5
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 3,682
Quoting: BDAvs
I was being nice. Agreed it’s a bit much. But Newhook isn’t the answer.


You don't trade a young C that has less than two NHL seasons under his belt for an over-the-hill rental. This is terrible asset management.
MeetYourMakar and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:38 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
BDAvs
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 330
Likes: 49
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Even if he isn't the answer for the Avs, he's more than worth renting Kane now.


Did you check out the top 2 forward lines or just jump to an opinion on the trade?
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:46 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Did you check out the top 2 forward lines or just jump to an opinion on the trade?


considering landeskog is not a C, yeah the top 2 lines dont make any sense

As an Avs fan you should know that Landeskog never has played centre in his career.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:52 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,372
Likes: 2,239
Quoting: BDAvs
Did you check out the top 2 forward lines or just jump to an opinion on the trade?


Did you see what Kane has done this season or did you jump to the conclusion he's still a 1st line winger?
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:52 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
BDAvs
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 330
Likes: 49
Quoting: coga16
considering landeskog is not a C, yeah the top 2 lines dont make any sense

As an Avs fan you should know that Landeskog never has played centre in his career.


Oh shoot you’re right. After sweetening the trade for the Avs I forgot to finalize the lineup. 🤩
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:53 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
Quoting: coga16
considering landeskog is not a C, yeah the top 2 lines dont make any sense

As an Avs fan you should know that Landeskog never has played centre in his career.


I’d argue that Landeskog functionally plays center a lot of the time based on his defensive role and how many face offs he takes.

Nevertheless, this is bad. Even if Newhook never develops beyond what he is today: Newhook and a 1st for Kane is just bad for who Kane is at this point of his career.

He was fun to watch in his prime, but those days are long gone unfortunately.
NJDevils1317 and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:54 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Oh shoot you’re right. After sweetening the trade for the Avs I forgot to finalize the lineup. 🤩


and mikko is not a Center either, once agin as an Avs fan you should know better than this
NJDevils1317 and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:56 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: turtlemountain
I’d argue that Landeskog functionally plays center a lot of the time based on his defensive role and how many face offs he takes.

Nevertheless, this is bad. Even if Newhook never develops beyond what he is today: Newhook and a 1st for Kane is just bad for who Kane is at this point of his career.

He was fun to watch in his prime, but those days are long gone unfortunately.


he never plays up the middle of the ice, face-offs are not what being a Center is about, He would have to change how he plays his game to actually play C, its not as simple as hes good defensively and takes draws so lets shift him to the middle. I dont doubt that Landy could learn to play Centre but he has never in his career, so why force it now
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:57 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
BDAvs
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 330
Likes: 49
Quoting: coga16
and mikko is not a Center either, once agin as an Avs fan you should know better than this


Landeskog and Rantanen play center quite often. They make $16 mil combined and should be able to figure it out. If not we’re in trouble.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:57 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,029
Likes: 9,333
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Did you see what Kane has done this season or did you jump to the conclusion he's still a 1st line winger?


Yeah because a NHL top player last season goes to average this season just months later all because of that mighty birthday passed! LOL Ever think there is more to the story?
BDAvs liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 4:58 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Landeskog and Rantanen play center quite often. They make $16 mil combined and should be able to figure it out. If not we’re in trouble.


landeskog has never played centre...not one game in his career.
Rantanen had to shift over to C for 3-4 games bc of Kadri injury

once again as an avs fan you should know this.
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:00 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
BDAvs
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 330
Likes: 49
Quoting: coga16
landeskog has never played centre...not one game in his career.
Rantanen had to shift over to C for 3-4 games bc of Kadri injury

once again as an avs fan you should know this.


Well, Kadri no longer exists. You like to offer problems but no solutions.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:03 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Well, Kadri no longer exists. You like to offer problems but no solutions.


Well trading for wingers and forcing players to play a position that is not their natural role is not a solution either

I have said Many times in the past that Adam Henrique is the ideal trade piece for the avs, he adds a nice short term solution to the 2c spot, allows newhook to grow into it more, and Henrique does what the avs do well, hes smart, a good skater, great defensively

your solution doesnt really fit with bendar, Kane as offensively gifted he is, is a awful defensibly, like one of the worst in the leagues for a top line player. Hes not gong to change how he plays on the avs, and that wont work well under Bednar
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:07 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
BDAvs
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 330
Likes: 49
Quoting: coga16
Well trading for wingers and forcing players to play a position that is not their natural role is not a solution either

I have said Many times in the past that Adam Henrique is the ideal trade piece for the avs, he adds a nice short term solution to the 2c spot, allows newhook to grow into it more, and Henrique does what the avs do well, hes smart, a good skater, great defensively

your solution doesnt really fit with bendar, Kane as offensively gifted he is, is a awful defensibly, like one of the worst in the leagues for a top line player. Hes not gong to change how he plays on the avs, and that wont work well under Bednar


I like that idea as well. What’s the cost?
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:09 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,569
Likes: 4,573
Targeting Kane for the Avs is beyond awful. Doesn't fit a team need and hasn't been producing, plus will cost waaay more than the Avs can afford to give up. Give your head a shake lol. If the Avs have to overpay at all it should be targeting someone like Henrique/Jenner/Bennett, who can insulate Newhook for 1-3 years whilst he learns the 2C job, and then either be moved, let go or dropped down to 3C.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:11 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
I like that idea as well. What’s the cost?


having some nice disuccions with Ducks fans on the site, a 1st for him 50% retained. Which would be nice pick up bc of the additional term and you get a transitional 2C over the next season and a half
BDAvs liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:11 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
Quoting: coga16
he never plays up the middle of the ice, face-offs are not what being a Center is about, He would have to change how he plays his game to actually play C, its not as simple as hes good defensively and takes draws so lets shift him to the middle. I dont doubt that Landy could learn to play Centre but he has never in his career, so why force it now


Playing center largely about what your role is in each zone. For periods of MacKinnon’s career, Landeskog was almost always F3 in the defensive zone while MacKinnon had easier defensive responsibilities more like a winger. Once they move to the offensive zone, MacKinnon takes over as a more traditional C.

It’s not ideal and it’d be an awkward fit, but stranger things have been posted on this godforsaken website.
BDAvs liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:15 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: turtlemountain
Playing center largely about what your role is in each zone. For periods of MacKinnon’s career, Landeskog was almost always F3 in the defensive zone while MacKinnon had easier defensive responsibilities more like a winger. Once they move to the offensive zone, MacKinnon takes over as a more traditional C.

It’s not ideal and it’d be an awkward fit, but stranger things have been posted on this godforsaken website.


but if hes not playing on Macks Line, hes not goign to get that transitional fluid hybrid role at C, it will be more straight line C which I think isnt that easy to shift to so late in his career. He really will be playing a traditional C position with his responsibilities in all zones. I think its risky
BDAvs liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:17 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
BDAvs
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 330
Likes: 49
Quoting: coga16
having some nice disuccions with Ducks fans on the site, a 1st for him 50% retained. Which would be nice pick up bc of the additional term and you get a transitional 2C over the next season and a half


It’d be cool if we could do Newhook for their 2024 1st.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:18 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
Quoting: coga16
but if hes not playing on Macks Line, hes not goign to get that transitional fluid hybrid role at C, it will be more straight line C which I think isnt that easy to shift to so late in his career. He really will be playing a traditional C position with his responsibilities in all zones. I think its risky


Yeah I guess my point is that in a thread where the Avs are trading Newhook+1st for Patrick Kane, Landeskog playing C is the least crazy thing to worry about lol.
BDAvs liked this.
Feb. 19, 2023 at 5:19 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: turtlemountain
Yeah I guess my point is that in a thread where the Avs are trading Newhook+1st for Patrick Kane, Landeskog playing C is the least crazy thing to worry about lol.


thats fair,
BDAvs liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll