SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Use of Cap and Assets

Created by: CJ1909
Team: 2023-24 Detroit Red Wings
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 27, 2023
Published: Apr. 27, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
- Wings pick best player available with how this years lotto turns out
- Talbot signing could be any veteran goalie that can provide some more confident starts unlike this year
- Wings take a chance with Granlund to rebuild value as that 3C slot has been another gaping hole which also provides Kasper a much needed year in Grand Rapids so we can hang onto his 3 year ELC
- Myers ($6M), Perron ($4.75M) & vet goalie ($2.5M) come off the books next year + $2-3M cap increase when Seider ($8M increase) @ Raymond's ($5-6M increase) deals hit the books
- Do or die season for Veleno

All in all I think this team can sneak into the playoffs with good goalie play, better defensive play and improved special teams.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,200,000
8$8,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
1$2,500,000
Trades
1.
2.
DET
  1. Granlund, Mikael
  2. Petry, Jeff
  3. 2023 1st round pick (PIT)
  4. 2023 3rd round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
#14 for #18 swap as part of cap moves
PIT
  1. Chiarot, Ben
  2. Zadina, Filip
  3. 2023 1st round pick (NYI)
  4. 2024 4th round pick (DET)
3.
OTT
  1. Kubalik, Dominik
  2. 2023 1st round pick (PIT)
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
#14 + '23 2nd + (2nd/3rd for Kubs at cheap cap who puts up goals)
4.
DET
  1. Myers, Tyler
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. 2023 5th round pick (DET)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the STL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2024
Logo of the DET
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2025
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$72,117,639$0$4,740,000$11,382,361
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,460,000$1,460,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NTC
UFA - 8
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$878,333$878,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C
RFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,750,000$4,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 27, 2023 at 7:13 p.m.
#1
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,682
Likes: 8,302
I don't get the Johansen love but I wouldn't move him for Fabbri if I'm Nashville, Fabbri can't stay on the ice. Pittsburgh might do something to clear cap but I doubt it includes taking Chairot back. They'd be better keepimg Grandlund than taking him. Sure Myers , sure debrincat
Apr. 27, 2023 at 7:22 p.m.
#2
GO KNIGHTS GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 2,273
What is up with all the Johansen for Fabbri trades
Apr. 27, 2023 at 7:23 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 301
Likes: 121
Quoting: Jfstompers
I don't get the Johansen love but I wouldn't move him for Fabbri if I'm Nashville, Fabbri can't stay on the ice. Pittsburgh might do something to clear cap but I doubt it includes taking Chairot back. They'd be better keepimg Grandlund than taking him. Sure Myers , sure debrincat


RyJo is a much needed 2C that is solid on draws, plays big, allows Copp to be offensive and his $8M cap doesn't hurt us while

Overall I agree about Granlund, but lots of PITT fan despise the Granlund move. I just don't think he fits their system, but under a coaching change it might be better for them. I feel them getting ride of the $11.25M in cap while only taking on Chairot who is more than serviceable and gets a bad rep would be a better Dman in the PITT system that plays more similar to MTL or WPG where he had success.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 7:25 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 301
Likes: 121
Quoting: TheFastAndTheFleuryous
What is up with all the Johansen for Fabbri trades


It seems like the Preds want to move RyJo to let the younger Cs in their system develop and Fabbri can provide some scoring punch on the wing with veteran presence for a decent cap him (half of RyJo). And if Fabbri can't get on the ice at least they have $8M free now.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 7:33 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 424
I think the Pens have better options. Even though he's overpriced, Petry is still a legit 2nd pairing defenseman. Ben Chairot tanked Seider so hard when they were paired together that I don't trust him on my blueline period. I don't think Zadina for Granlund makes up that difference, and Granlund's buyout is pretty reasonable.
I get the idea behind the trade, and it's an interesting one to consider. Yeah, it's more cap space to build a better supporting cast, but IMO the downgrade to our already poor defense is significant enough to counteract that.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 7:33 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 3,380
Likes: 1,192
I actually dont want Chiarot.. rather keep Petry, buyout Granlund and keep the higher pick.
GoGuins18 liked this.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 7:53 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 5,424
Likes: 3,450
Preds do it
Apr. 27, 2023 at 8:00 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,704
Likes: 8,292
Quoting: Marcsnack
I actually dont want Chiarot.. rather keep Petry, buyout Granlund and keep the higher pick.


How do you feel about a #14 and Granlund for #18 and Zadina trade. I don't know how I feel about it yet but it just popped in my brain.
Marcsnack, CJ1909 and GoGuins18 liked this.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 8:01 p.m.
#9
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,682
Likes: 8,302
Quoting: CJ1909
RyJo is a much needed 2C that is solid on draws, plays big, allows Copp to be offensive and his $8M cap doesn't hurt us while

Overall I agree about Granlund, but lots of PITT fan despise the Granlund move. I just don't think he fits their system, but under a coaching change it might be better for them. I feel them getting ride of the $11.25M in cap while only taking on Chairot who is more than serviceable and gets a bad rep would be a better Dman in the PITT system that plays more similar to MTL or WPG where he had success.


If I had to have Chairot making 4.7 for 3 more years or Granlund for 2 at 5 it's not a choice. I. Keeping Granlund and playing him in the middle 6 where he is actually an asset. Chairot isn't good.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 8:07 p.m.
#10
Schulz33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 314
Likes: 121
I mean, I think it's a reasonable offer for Myers compared to most people on this site. I just wonder if VAN doesn't pay his bonus and try to get away without having to pay to get rid of him. When you consider there's no retention, its probably worth trading down from a 3rd to 5th to shed 6 mil.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 8:33 p.m.
#11
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 846
Quoting: Haymaker26
I think the Pens have better options. Even though he's overpriced, Petry is still a legit 2nd pairing defenseman. Ben Chairot tanked Seider so hard when they were paired together that I don't trust him on my blueline period. I don't think Zadina for Granlund makes up that difference, and Granlund's buyout is pretty reasonable.
I get the idea behind the trade, and it's an interesting one to consider. Yeah, it's more cap space to build a better supporting cast, but IMO the downgrade to our already poor defense is significant enough to counteract that.


To be fair, Chiarot and Seider were a bad idea. Seider did pretty good last year with Oesterle. Seider did unbelievably well with Walman. Turns out, seider is a puck carrier but he can't do it when his partner can't keep up to give him an outlet. Yzerman is drafting guys who can skate for a reason.
CJ1909 and Haymaker26 liked this.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 8:55 p.m.
#12
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,977
Likes: 5,384
Wings pass on everything, this is terrible
Apr. 27, 2023 at 9:04 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 301
Likes: 121
Quoting: buffbry
Wings pass on everything, this is terrible


What would you do?
Apr. 27, 2023 at 9:07 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 301
Likes: 121
Quoting: tonyhzs
To be fair, Chiarot and Seider were a bad idea. Seider did pretty good last year with Oesterle. Seider did unbelievably well with Walman. Turns out, seider is a puck carrier but he can't do it when his partner can't keep up to give him an outlet. Yzerman is drafting guys who can skate for a reason.


Completely agree and that is why I think Chiarot was put in such bad light. He was a terrible match for Seider. Seider needs to play at pace not that slow and rugged old style that Chiarot excels at. I feel like Chiarot is due for a bounce-back year, but the roster just doesn't make sense with him and Maata.
tonyhzs liked this.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 9:44 p.m.
#15
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,977
Likes: 5,384
Quoting: CJ1909
What would you do?


Not anything here except the ryjo trade
Apr. 27, 2023 at 9:57 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 424
Quoting: tonyhzs
To be fair, Chiarot and Seider were a bad idea. Seider did pretty good last year with Oesterle. Seider did unbelievably well with Walman. Turns out, seider is a puck carrier but he can't do it when his partner can't keep up to give him an outlet. Yzerman is drafting guys who can skate for a reason.


Even if that's the case, it's still not the best move for Pittsburgh. It makes the value a little closer, but the Pens already have an issue with keeping up with faster, younger teams. Chiarot wouldn't fix that issue any better than Petry would.
Apr. 27, 2023 at 10:01 p.m.
#17
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 846
Quoting: Haymaker26
Even if that's the case, it's still not the best move for Pittsburgh. It makes the value a little closer, but the Pens already have an issue with keeping up with faster, younger teams. Chiarot wouldn't fix that issue any better than Petry would.


100% agree. Kind of the same with Petry in Detroit. Thr trade proposed here really doesn't make a lot of sense for either team.
CJ1909 liked this.
Apr. 28, 2023 at 1:20 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 301
Likes: 121
Quoting: tonyhzs
100% agree. Kind of the same with Petry in Detroit. Thr trade proposed here really doesn't make a lot of sense for either team.


I do believe that a Chiarot/Petry would actually work esp in the playoffs. Their styles match well together and they wouldn't try to skate too much thus getting them out of position as they would play more zone based coverage. We need a good RHD for 1/2 years to get us through the last 2/3 years of the rebuild that can bring solid vet presence and some more leadership for the plethora of prospects we are trying to develop, especially on the D side. Maata would need to be shipped out instead as the left side is now a wasted log jam with multiple years tied up and Simon needs to be playing.
Apr. 28, 2023 at 8:10 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 846
Quoting: CJ1909
I do believe that a Chiarot/Petry would actually work esp in the playoffs. Their styles match well together and they wouldn't try to skate too much thus getting them out of position as they would play more zone based coverage. We need a good RHD for 1/2 years to get us through the last 2/3 years of the rebuild that can bring solid vet presence and some more leadership for the plethora of prospects we are trying to develop, especially on the D side. Maata would need to be shipped out instead as the left side is now a wasted log jam with multiple years tied up and Simon needs to be playing.


Maata is fine. Petry and Chiarot would be a disaster. Detroit needs a mobile RD. Maata was good for Hronek because both players relied on outlet passes, and both knew how to cover for the other. Seider and Walman can do that too, but they also love moving the puck themselves because they are awesome skaters. This is what separates good defensemen from great ones. Maata is great at the outlet pass, but he needs another outlet pass D. Maata is better than Chiarot at everything but shooting and toughness, which Detroit lacks. If Maata could figure out fusion with Chiarot, DragonBall Z style, we'd be left with a great defenseman.
CoachCoach and CJ1909 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll