SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Campbell dump

Created by: wojohawk
Team: 2023-24 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 7, 2023
Published: Nov. 7, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Oil get to dump 3 more years of Campbell (after this one), upgrade on Ceci (you can debate how much Murphy is an upgrade, but I think he is at the least some), get a goalie that has been able to stop a beachball while playing in front of a bad D and horrid team), almost 2 million in cap space so you can actually roster a 23 man team &/or bank cap for a TDL piece.

Hawks get a horrid goalie to help their tank this season and decide what to do with Campbell after the season, 2 first, a prospect that was a 1st even if his development has not progressed at that level to this point, and Ceci can fill the role of legit RHD to break in LHD kids the next couple of seasons.
Trades
CHI
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Ceci, Cody
  4. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  5. 2026 1st round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Johnson, Reese
  2. Mrázek, Petr ($1,900,000 retained)
  3. Murphy, Connor
  4. 2024 2nd round pick (LAK)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$70,310,957$0$6,855,000$13,189,043
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$505,000$505K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 7, 2023 at 4:56 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 729
So you’re really not upgrading the team and giving up a 2024 unprotected first.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 5:05 p.m.
#2
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 306
So you’re trading the oilers salary back, but we give up 2 firsts ? What
Nov. 7, 2023 at 5:13 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 1,430
Quoting: smokewiseganja
So you’re trading the oilers salary back, but we give up 2 firsts ? What


You're netting 2 million in cap space (if you want to bury Reece Johnson in the AHL which is what I would suggest). Mrazek is a pending UFA so you convert 3 more years of Campbell at 5 per for no more years of Mrazek.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 5:19 p.m.
#4
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 306
Quoting: wojohawk
You're netting 2 million in cap space (if you want to bury Reece Johnson in the AHL which is what I would suggest). Mrazek is a pending UFA so you convert 3 more years of Campbell at 5 per for no more years of Mrazek.


Either way I wouldn’t spend 2 firsts to dump Campbell period. Maybe 1. This makes no sense
Fran615 liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 5:30 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 499
Way too steep...
Chicago says yes obviously.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 5:32 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 667
Likes: 201
I think you're selling them a Murphy Ceci swap when all they want to buy is a Campbell and Mrazik swap.

I think if I'm Chicago I'm charging at least 1st to take Campbell, honestly, I don't know if that's enough, so add a 2nd on top. Mrazek has had a hot start, but his value is probably virtually zero at 3.8m, call him a 4th and 3rd with retention since you've got leverage.

So I'd say Campbell a 1st, 2nd and 4th for Mrazek 100% or change the 4th to a 3rd for 50% retention. The first would 100% be protected, and you could say 2nd becomes a 1st if they make it to the Stanley Cup, maybe, also top 10 protected.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 6:29 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 550
Likes: 395
Quoting: SGB88
I think you're selling them a Murphy Ceci swap when all they want to buy is a Campbell and Mrazik swap.

I think if I'm Chicago I'm charging at least 1st to take Campbell, honestly, I don't know if that's enough, so add a 2nd on top. Mrazek has had a hot start, but his value is probably virtually zero at 3.8m, call him a 4th and 3rd with retention since you've got leverage.

So I'd say Campbell a 1st, 2nd and 4th for Mrazek 100% or change the 4th to a 3rd for 50% retention. The first would 100% be protected, and you could say 2nd becomes a 1st if they make it to the Stanley Cup, maybe, also top 10 protected.


I can’t speak for other Hawks fans, but if I’m taking on Campbell for 3+ years at that cap hit, I’d need multiple 1sts. They can be protected, but I just don’t think it’s worth it otherwise.
Hawksguy81 liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 6:35 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 10,359
Hawks probably don't do this. The two 1st's is what it takes to dump the 3+ years left on Canpbell. So Hawks trade Murphy, Mrazak half retained and a 2nd for Bourgault and Ceci? Can't see the Hawks doing that.
OGap12 liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 6:41 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 667
Likes: 201
Quoting: thesaadfather
I can’t speak for other Hawks fans, but if I’m taking on Campbell for 3+ years at that cap hit, I’d need multiple 1sts. They can be protected, but I just don’t think it’s worth it otherwise.


Yeah, I totally get it. It's such a bad Cap hit. I don't know if anything that bad has ever been dumped. Like that Cap hit will still be there when Bedard is off his ELC. Really Sharks are probably a better target and their Goalies actually aren't playing that bad, its mostly the team in front of them. I mean OEL was maybe worse, but I'm pretty sure the Canucks paid to get that.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll