SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Help

Created by: Nskelton
Team: 2023-24 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 24, 2023
Published: Nov. 24, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MIN
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. Johansen, Ryan
  3. Ritchie, Calum [Reserve List]
  4. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2026
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$77,125,000$637,500$0$6,375,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$987,500$987,500
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 24, 2023 at 10:36 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
I like it for the Avs but I don't think MIN would go for it
OldNYIfan liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 10:44 p.m.
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,436
Likes: 26,189
Hard to imagine that two bitter intra-divisional rivals would make a major trade.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 10:56 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 3,661
It's a swift and resounding no from Minnesota here
RazWild liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 11:19 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 301
Likes: 42
Quoting: Caerii
It's a swift and resounding no from Minnesota here


Really?
Nov. 24, 2023 at 11:23 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 3,661
Quoting: Nskelton
Really?


Absolutely. Faber is at least as valuable as Byram at this point, and Eriksson Ek is by far the best player in the deal, signed to a great contract long term.
C21 and RazWild liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 11:24 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 4,780
Would love Eriksson Ek for the Avs 2C spot and that's a fair old package there even though I suspect Minny still wouldn't go for it. We could always try ol' silky hands MacDermid at 2C though! tears of joy
Nov. 25, 2023 at 12:20 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 301
Likes: 42
Quoting: Caerii
Absolutely. Faber is at least as valuable as Byram at this point, and Eriksson Ek is by far the best player in the deal, signed to a great contract long term.


Faber is like the only defensemen I know on your team besides surgeon, which his why I added him.
Nov. 25, 2023 at 12:21 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 301
Likes: 42
Quoting: TJTwolf
Would love Eriksson Ek for the Avs 2C spot and that's a fair old package there even though I suspect Minny still wouldn't go for it. We could always try ol' silky hands MacDermid at 2C though! tears of joy


I think I'd use the same package to get Cirelli as well
Nov. 25, 2023 at 12:55 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 3,661
Quoting: Nskelton
Faber is like the only defensemen I know on your team besides surgeon, which his why I added him.


He looks very good as a 21 year old rookie playing top-4 minutes. He's very defense first, but the offense is there once in a while. But he's been excellent at shutting down top competition.
Nov. 25, 2023 at 2:16 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,787
Likes: 9,380
Hate it
Nov. 25, 2023 at 2:18 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,787
Likes: 9,380
Quoting: Nskelton
I think I'd use the same package to get Cirelli as well


Bro Cirelli has never had a 50pt season and you’d trade the equivalent of 3 1st round picks and more?
TJTwolf liked this.
Nov. 25, 2023 at 9:58 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 4,780
Quoting: Nskelton
I think I'd use the same package to get Cirelli as well


I definitely wouldn't do that package for Cirelli if I were Joe/GMCM.
Nov. 25, 2023 at 10:24 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,787
Likes: 9,380
Quoting: Caerii
Absolutely. Faber is at least as valuable as Byram at this point, and Eriksson Ek is by far the best player in the deal, signed to a great contract long term.


Fabre isn’t close to Byram. Knock Byram for availability issues but don’t pretend he didn’t outright dominate in the cup run and his offense is so many magnitudes higher it isn’t funny on just about every other team in the league he is a top pairing and on a very healthy amount he is the #1 dman. Calling Faber close is the ultimate homer call.
Nov. 25, 2023 at 4:21 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 3,661
Quoting: Xqb15a
Fabre isn’t close to Byram. Knock Byram for availability issues but don’t pretend he didn’t outright dominate in the cup run and his offense is so many magnitudes higher it isn’t funny on just about every other team in the league he is a top pairing and on a very healthy amount he is the #1 dman. Calling Faber close is the ultimate homer call.


Sheesh, talk about ironic
RazWild liked this.
Nov. 25, 2023 at 6:47 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 3,189
Edited Nov. 25, 2023 at 7:22 p.m.
Quoting: Xqb15a
Fabre isn’t close to Byram. Knock Byram for availability issues but don’t pretend he didn’t outright dominate in the cup run and his offense is so many magnitudes higher it isn’t funny on just about every other team in the league he is a top pairing and on a very healthy amount he is the #1 dman. Calling Faber close is the ultimate homer call.


Uh huh, and let's not pretend that Faber's defense isn't so many magnitudes better than Byram's here either. Byram is an offensive defenseman whose is barely an average defender. While Faber is a defensive shutdown defenseman whose is solid offensively.

Comparing the two stylistically is moronic and an apples to oranges affair. Especially when Faber is closer to a Jonas Brodin, Adam Pelech, Jacob Slavin, or Devon Toews type of defender. That doesn't diminish his value, it's just a different TYPE of value. This has nothing to do with skillset and absolutely everything to do with PLAYER VALUE.

Furthermore, Byram is hardly a #1 on most teams, he's maybe a #2 but primarily a #3. Same as faber.

Their VALUE is the same, regardless of who does what, or plays a certain way.

But you want to mouth off about being homer'ish. Pot meet kettle.
Nov. 26, 2023 at 12:03 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,440
Likes: 6,060
Quoting: Caerii
Sheesh, talk about ironic


Quoting: RazWild
Uh huh, and let's not pretend that Faber's defense isn't so many magnitudes better than Byram's here either. Byram is an offensive defenseman whose is barely an average defender. While Faber is a defensive shutdown defenseman whose is solid offensively.

Comparing the two stylistically is moronic and an apples to oranges affair. Especially when Faber is closer to a Jonas Brodin, Adam Pelech, Jacob Slavin, or Devon Toews type of defender. That doesn't diminish his value, it's just a different TYPE of value. This has nothing to do with skillset and absolutely everything to do with PLAYER VALUE.

Furthermore, Byram is hardly a #1 on most teams, he's maybe a #2 but primarily a #3. Same as faber.

Their VALUE is the same, regardless of who does what, or plays a certain way.

But you want to mouth off about being homer'ish. Pot meet kettle.


Gotta agree with you guys on this one. Currently Byram and Faber are roughly equal while JEE >> Johansen + Ritchie + 1st
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll