Quoting: Terrifiedofeveryone
Points per 60 is a bad stat when used out of context. Granlund plays way more than he should (21 minutes per game) because the Sharks have really poor offensive depth. That’s going to drive his point/60 way down. He’s worth quite a bit more than a 5th.
Quoting: Letsgosharks
worth a 5th? gtfo lol
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Dude has 15 points over his last 9 games and has played exceptionally well! Good on pk and pp and has been solid 5v5, I don’t even know if I’d except anything less than a 1st at this point
But that’s retention for a 1 & 1/2! I would hold off and keep him unless we get a better offer! He’s been good here!
Ok. Let's look at his stats the last 2 years 5v5:
Goals per 60: 0.19 this year, 0.35 last year
Points per 60: 1.30 this year, 1.23 last year
Expected Goals per 60: 0.70 this year, 0.53 last year
Shooting %: 3% this year. 8% last year
Corsi: 40% this year, 48% last year
Shooting talent above average: -4% both years
So 5v5 (you know 80% of his ice time) he is worse than last year where he was a salary dump.
How about on the PP? Oh, it seems he has 0 Goals and 4 assists. His Points per 60 there is 3.8 and last year (when everyone said he was trash on the PP) it was... 3.1
Ok the PK. Maybe he's great there...
His On Ice Expected Goals against per 60 is 8.86 which is 139th in the NHL.
So based on the numbers, I'm either being trolled or you are losing grip of reality. I suspect trolled because of bolded text above. The 13 points in his last 9 games represents nearly 70% of his points on the season. Unless someone hires Ron Hextall, no one is paying anything of note for Granlund. They wouldn't last year, they won't this year. Sorry.