SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What is the price

Created by: sound_arguments
Team: 2023-24 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 10, 2024
Published: Jan. 10, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Any clues as to what Anaheim is looking for to move Zegras?
Trades
ANA
  1. Del Mastro, Ethan
  2. 2024 1st round pick (TBL)
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (OTT)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$81,715,957$0$5,887,500$1,784,043
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$505,000$505K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 10 at 6:44 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,743
Likes: 12,126
Anaheim isn’t looking to move Zegras
Jan. 10 at 6:47 p.m.
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,135
Likes: 6,903
If he's moved, it's for a blue chip piece at a position of need in Verbeeks preferred flavor. Not super familiar with Chicagos system but unless you have a stud RW or RD prospect with size, it's not happening.
Jan. 10 at 6:53 p.m.
#3
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
A lot more than that pathetic offer, He'll cost you pieces you won't want to surrender.
SomeonesOffended liked this.
Jan. 10 at 7:00 p.m.
#4
BEDSY
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 143
Likes: 41
literally fair
JK74 and Earth liked this.
Jan. 10 at 7:01 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,158
Likes: 11,042
CHI should not go after Zegras.
SomeonesOffended, JK74 and Earth liked this.
Jan. 10 at 7:03 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 195
Likes: 75
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
If he's moved, it's for a blue chip piece at a position of need in Verbeeks preferred flavor. Not super familiar with Chicagos system but unless you have a stud RW or RD prospect with size, it's not happening.


Fair enough. Absolutely what the Blackhawks don't have either. Unless they want to wait three years on Sam Rinzel who is very high-risk/high-reward right now.
OldNYIfan, LivingAnew and JK74 liked this.
Jan. 10 at 7:18 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,750
Likes: 25,574
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
If he's moved, it's for a blue chip piece at a position of need in Verbeeks preferred flavor. Not super familiar with Chicagos system but unless you have a stud RW or RD prospect with size, it's not happening.


Quoting: sound_arguments
Fair enough. Absolutely what the Blackhawks don't have either. Unless they want to wait three years on Sam Rinzel who is very high-risk/high-reward right now.

What about Frank Nazar? If he has the strong potential to be a top-6 forward, then the Tampa first and Chicago 2025 second might do it.

But I'm convinced that Anaheim isn't interested in moving him. What's the rush? The latest we'll be selecting in this year's draft is #4 overall.
Garak liked this.
Jan. 10 at 7:45 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: OldNYIfan
What about Frank Nazar? If he has the strong potential to be a top-6 forward, then the Tampa first and Chicago 2025 second might do it.

But I'm convinced that Anaheim isn't interested in moving him. What's the rush? The latest we'll be selecting in this year's draft is #4 overall.


I'd rather keep Nazar. Not saying Zegras isn't worth putting together a blockbuster package but I believe Nazar had the potential to be just as good as Zegras and he's younger.
Garak liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll