SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

save the season

Created by: TerreriStepper
Team: 2023-24 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 26, 2024
Published: Jan. 26, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
just a fun experiment to imagine the best case attempt to put the chips in for this season. Assumes most of the injured players return around after the all star break (except hamilton). Wouldn't actually give up this much for the current season given the youth on defense, but it's a thought experiment
Trades
1.
NJD
  1. Henrique, Adam ($2,912,500 retained)
ANA
  1. Foote, Nolan
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (NJD)
  3. 2024 5th round pick (NJD)
  4. 2025 4th round pick (NJD)
2.
NJD
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. Ullmark, Linus
BOS
  1. Schmid, Akira
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (NJD)
3.
NJD
  1. Tanev, Christopher ($1,500,000 retained)
CGY
  1. Bahl, Kevin
  2. 2024 5th round pick (COL)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (NJD)
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$73,286,250$422,500$5,482,500$10,213,750
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,800,000$8,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
-$1,456,250-$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
-$375,000-$375,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,687,500$2,687,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 26 at 2:47 p.m.
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,346
Likes: 7,056
wanna hear a secret? the boston bruins aren't selling.
Newgod77 liked this.
Jan. 26 at 2:50 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,939
Likes: 1,224
The open question is pretty simple. Boston has found a formula that is very successful and frankly I could see them just run it back next year as well. I think they are showing that the fears about their center position were overblown.

That said, a deal for a young center / winger might be interesting
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 3:01 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
TerreriStepper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 138
Likes: 26
Quoting: Celtics21
The open question is pretty simple. Boston has found a formula that is very successful and frankly I could see them just run it back next year as well. I think they are showing that the fears about their center position were overblown.

That said, a deal for a young center / winger might be interesting


yah that's fair, this was mostly for fun. I was basing it off some other trade proposals I've seen Boston making on here. The thought being that you would be freeing up 7 million or so in additional cap space, while also gaining a 1'st and 3rd, which could be bundled up with some other assets to make a big trade, maybe for a guy like Chychrun or something. Schmid is obviously a downgrade but an acceptable backup, and if you prefer an in house backup would still likely be worth something to another team as a trade chip. We could also put Toffoli in the mix?

But yah I hear you, I don't expect Boston to make any moves like this. Maybe in the offseason? Cheers
Jan. 26 at 3:04 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 1,848
ANA would consider a RW prospect, but LW will be getting pretty busy with Gauthier added

Zegras
Gauthier
Vatrano/Killorn
Lundestrom (as long as Strome is 3C)
Jones

Otherwise probably somewhere a shade below 1st rd value
Jan. 26 at 3:08 p.m.
#5
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 3,224
Quoting: Jded
ANA would consider a RW prospect, but LW will be getting pretty busy with Gauthier added

Zegras
Gauthier
Vatrano/Killorn
Lundestrom (as long as Strome is 3C)
Jones

Otherwise probably somewhere a shade below 1st rd value


You can have Graeme Clarke and a 3rd
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 3:12 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 1,848
Quoting: dgibb10
You can have Graeme Clarke and a 3rd


Not familiar with his game but after a quick glance it seems fair on value. Might lean 1st rounder if anyone offered it straight up, otherwise I’d be cool with that
Jan. 26 at 3:13 p.m.
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 3,224
I’d do the 1st, 2nd deals. I wouldn’t do the Tanev deal. Go after depth PK forwards.

Jake Evans, Trenin come to mind
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 3:14 p.m.
#8
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 3,224
Quoting: Jded
Not familiar with his game but after a quick glance it seems fair on value. Might lean 1st rounder if anyone offered it straight up, otherwise I’d be cool with that


Yeah if someone offers you a 1st I’d have to think NJD taps out and says thanks for the consideration, and if that offer is out there I would take it as Anaheim.

Depending on the situation and what other moves are in store NJD might be able to swing the balance over a similar offer slightly by needing less/no retention
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 3:31 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,718
Likes: 18,535
Would this team make 2nd round?

I would say they make playoffs…but 2nd round…I dunno.
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 3:46 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
TerreriStepper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 138
Likes: 26
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Would this team make 2nd round?

I would say they make playoffs…but 2nd round…I dunno.


Yah, I mean. In a playoff context, that is an amazing forward core, a elite top six and a great bottom six to boot. Also great goaltending. But the defense is still shaky (they'll be great in time, L Hughes and S Nemec will be studs, but for now they are still very young). My goal was to at least buttress that up with two solid shutdown guys. Then, if Hamilton comes back, with Seigs, it's actually not bad depth wise, it's just lacking maturity in the top four. But could the massive improvement in goaltending help that, and ultimately allow the offense to lead the way?

Depends. I'd prefer if all of this happened with a different coach. Once Nemec and L Hughes fully develop though, I could see this being a contender all the way.
Jan. 26 at 3:50 p.m.
#11
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 3,224
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Would this team make 2nd round?

I would say they make playoffs…but 2nd round…I dunno.


If healthy going in with that Dcore, goaltending I can trust, and the forwards. I’d pick us over any team in the east.
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 3:50 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,718
Likes: 18,535
Quoting: TerreriStepper
Yah, I mean. In a playoff context, that is an amazing forward core, a elite top six and a great bottom six to boot. Also great goaltending. But the defense is still shaky (they'll be great in time, L Hughes and S Nemec will be studs, but for now they are still very young). My goal was to at least buttress that up with two solid shutdown guys. Then, if Hamilton comes back, with Seigs, it's actually not bad depth wise, it's just lacking maturity in the top four. But could the massive improvement in goaltending help that, and ultimately allow the offense to lead the way?

Depends. I'd prefer if all of this happened with a different coach. Once Nemec and L Hughes fully develop though, I could see this being a contender all the way.


It would be something…and at least another trip to 2nd round would help development of young guys.
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 3:59 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
TerreriStepper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 138
Likes: 26
Quoting: dgibb10
I’d do the 1st, 2nd deals. I wouldn’t do the Tanev deal. Go after depth PK forwards.

Jake Evans, Trenin come to mind


Yah that makes sense also. my thinking with Tanev was to add a shutdown guy responsible enough to play a first pairing and help get a handle on the mistakes rookies like Hughes will make. Otherwise it's hard to assemble a proper first pair. I think if we could tie L Hughes and Nemec to solid responsble guys, add in a guy like Hamilton to feast on third pairing competition, while cycling in the remaining Seigs, Marino, Miller types, all while playing a more disciplined defensive game, then - while perhaps not world beating - you'd still have a "strong enough" defensive unit, playing in front of a high end goaltender. Together, my thought is that this would be able to weather the storm, enough to allow our world-beating offense to do it's thing. If Ulmark hits his stride, the defense can focus on minimizing mistakes and nailing their coverage, then I think the offense could carry us quite far.

If you imagine this roster a little bit into the future, with a more mature L Hughes and Nemec, I would call them contenders. I would call the defense one of their strengths. The tricky part is their current inexperience.
Jan. 26 at 4:01 p.m.
#14
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 3,224
Quoting: TerreriStepper
Yah that makes sense also. my thinking with Tanev was to add a shutdown guy responsible enough to play a first pairing and help get a handle on the mistakes rookies like Hughes will make. Otherwise it's hard to assemble a proper first pair. I think if we could tie L Hughes and Nemec to solid responsble guys, add in a guy like Hamilton to feast on third pairing competition, while cycling in the remaining Seigs, Marino, Miller types, all while playing a more disciplined defensive game, then - while perhaps not world beating - you'd still have a "strong enough" defensive unit, playing in front of a high end goaltender. Together, my thought is that this would be able to weather the storm, enough to allow our world-beating offense to do it's thing. If Ulmark hits his stride, the defense can focus on minimizing mistakes and nailing their coverage, then I think the offense could carry us quite far.

If you imagine this roster a little bit into the future, with a more mature L Hughes and Nemec, I would call them contenders. I would call the defense one of their strengths. The tricky part is their current inexperience.


I like miller enough

Hughes,Nemec,Veteran Quality LD,Marino,Bahl,Miller (Bahl+Miller replaced by Siegs and Hamilton come playoff time)

But our PK is lacking, especially without McLeod who was our best in that area.
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 4:09 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
TerreriStepper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 138
Likes: 26
Quoting: dgibb10
I like miller enough

Hughes,Nemec,Veteran Quality LD,Marino,Bahl,Miller (Bahl+Miller replaced by Siegs and Hamilton come playoff time)

But our PK is lacking, especially without McLeod who was our best in that area.


See this is where I'm curious about your thoughts regarding Lindy. To me, if we are talking about Seig and Hamilton of last season (which I believe is who they are, I just cannot accept that they forgot how to play defense), then I'd agree. Even with one additional dman you could run out

Seig - Nemec
L Hughes - Marino
Grzelcyk - Hamilton
Bahl

At their peak guys like Seigenthaler and Marino were able to carry that. Currently though they don't quite seem there. To me I tie that in with many players regressing, which I further tie into the coaching.

Even then, with the amount that L Hughes and Nemec need, if the goal were to go all in, I'd be tempted to add a higher end player just for that top pairing. Even one year from now, L Hughes + Marino may be that, but if we are going "all in" on this season? I'd say you'd need someone a bit more established.

That said, I generally agree with you.
Jan. 26 at 4:35 p.m.
#16
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 3,224
Quoting: TerreriStepper
See this is where I'm curious about your thoughts regarding Lindy. To me, if we are talking about Seig and Hamilton of last season (which I believe is who they are, I just cannot accept that they forgot how to play defense), then I'd agree. Even with one additional dman you could run out

Seig - Nemec
L Hughes - Marino
Grzelcyk - Hamilton
Bahl

At their peak guys like Seigenthaler and Marino were able to carry that. Currently though they don't quite seem there. To me I tie that in with many players regressing, which I further tie into the coaching.

Even then, with the amount that L Hughes and Nemec need, if the goal were to go all in, I'd be tempted to add a higher end player just for that top pairing. Even one year from now, L Hughes + Marino may be that, but if we are going "all in" on this season? I'd say you'd need someone a bit more established.

That said, I generally agree with you.


I think Lindy should be fired ASAP.

Seems like he wants the devils to play a much less controlled game. Instead of holding the puck, fire it into the general area of the front of the net. Less skating involved (which is our strength). I also hate the stupid power play drop pass more than anything. The only thing that makes it even remotely viable is Jack and Bratt’s ridiculous talent. But having 4 of our guys and 4 of their guys all lined up on the blueline and hoping Jack or Bratt can find a way through is dumb. And stops everyone else from moving while they wait at the blueline.
TerreriStepper liked this.
Jan. 26 at 4:39 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
TerreriStepper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 138
Likes: 26
Quoting: dgibb10
I think Lindy should be fired ASAP.

Seems like he wants the devils to play a much less controlled game. Instead of holding the puck, fire it into the general area of the front of the net. Less skating involved (which is our strength). I also hate the stupid power play drop pass more than anything. The only thing that makes it even remotely viable is Jack and Bratt’s ridiculous talent. But having 4 of our guys and 4 of their guys all lined up on the blueline and hoping Jack or Bratt can find a way through is dumb. And stops everyone else from moving while they wait at the blueline.


From your lips to God's ears, brother. That's why I am tempted to say that if we address goaltending in a big way, plus maybe some depth here and there, then any coach worth his salt should be able to make that team a contender. There is just too much talent.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll