I actually really like the Jiricek/Savoie trade. Finally a realistic offer. I think I would do that trade even if it required adding other lesser picks or whatever.

Agreed-ish
The CBj trade is reasonable, but idk that Jiricek should be our main target in a trade for a top4 guy
Again though, makes sense

The trade w the Avs however, is just plain dumb
Idk wtf @sabres262 is thinking
We are NOT trading Mitts for futures
Idk why this is such a hard concept for some ???

What a terrible trade for Colorado. Easy decline.

Like the 1st trade, wouldn't do the 2nd Trade and if I am retaining Half on Olofsson I need a better pick than that.

Easy no for the Avs.

Let’s breathe on the Jiricek trades for a minute.

That being said, if he’s moved, it’s for another defense prospect. Preferably a RD.

Minnesota can't afford that from a cap perspective. He'd eat up the majority of our available cap space for next year. If we're adding a defenseman with term, it won't be someone with such a large contract without future money also going the other direction.

Yeah I agree about the Colorado trade. I mostly ignored it lol. But yeah I wouldn't actually want to trade Savoie since he is touted to be at minimum a top 6 forward so the return would have to be worth it and Jiricek is almost certainly going to be a top 4 dman. Trading a high-end forward prospect, which we have an abundance of, for someone that fills our biggest need. I will say it might be a bit of a gamble but I think it would be worth the risk.

But yeah, there's no way we are trading one of our most productive players for a chance at a future productive player. We already have that with Mitts. If He gets traded, there better be a solid top4D coming back at the minimum......... like Jiricek lmao.