SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just ideas - please dont freak out - peace

Created by: Fran615
Team: 2023-24 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 1, 2024
Published: Feb. 1, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Can you PLEASE not freak out - these are just ideas.
They are 100% certain to not please you. That's what this site is allllll about.

You can counter the proposals.
Or let me know your team does not need that player: and that'll be fine.

But no need for insults or condescending remarks; there's less and less civility on here.

Cheers everybody.
And PEACE. This is just sports.
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
The "insiders" speak of a value hovering around a 1st round pick, which for the teams mentioned, would be between 28 and 32.

CALM DOWN PLEASE. I'm just seeing what Seravalli and Pierre Lebrun are talking about.

It's not VALUE alone; it's MARKET.
EDM
  1. Monahan, Sean
Additional Details:
The "insiders" mention Edmonton, NYRangers, Boston or Colorado as likely destinations. Can be any of those teams.
2.
MTL
  1. 2026 5th round pick (TBL)
TBL
  1. Pearson, Tanner ($1,625,000 retained)
3.
MTL
  1. 2026 4th round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
Value seems to always mention a 3rd round pick, so I'll put a 4th round pick to calm down the visceral hatred of the Habs haters.
LAK
  1. Allen, Jake
Additional Details:
I picked L.A. only because of the rumors and rumblings. Couldn't care less who picks him uup really.
4.
MTL
  1. 2026 2nd round pick (WPG)
  2. 2026 3rd round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
Value is all over the place for him - so, again, relax, breathe in, breathe out. You can share your opinion without insults.
WPG
  1. Barron, Justin
Additional Details:
Any team.
Picked Winnipeg ONLY because of brother.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$72,200,416$1,170,000$3,977,500$11,299,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$828,333$828,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 1 at 8:50 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,554
Likes: 6,146
Despite the recent rumors, I do not believe that Jake Allen is a goaltender that the Kings are actively considering. His contract is too expensive and he's not enough of an upgrade over their current options.

If the Kings are going to pursue a goaltender that makes more than ~$1M, he needs to be a bonafide #1 goaltender. I don't think Allen fits the bill.
Fran615, Fox_Czar_Cup and Shanesaw9 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 8:50 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2023
Posts: 2,813
Likes: 956
HOLY ****, ALLEN FOR A 2026 4TH? HAVE YOU LOST YOUR MIND!!!!! HE'S WORTH AT LEAST A 2026 4TH AND A 2026 7TH!!!

THIS IS THE WORST ACGM EVER!!!

:P
Fran615, Fox_Czar_Cup and Shanesaw9 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 8:51 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Despite the recent rumors, I do not believe that Jake Allen is a goaltender that the Kings are actively considering. His contract is too expensive and he's not enough of an upgrade over their current options.

If the Kings are going to pursue a goaltender that makes more than ~$1M, he needs to be a bonafide #1 goaltender. I don't think Allen fits the bill.


Makes sense.

Thanks for the civil reply.
Cheers
Fox_Czar_Cup and Shanesaw9 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 8:52 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: Victor24
HOLY ****, ALLEN FOR A 2026 4TH? HAVE YOU LOST YOUR MIND!!!!! HE'S WORTH AT LEAST A 2026 4TH AND A 2026 7TH!!!

THIS IS THE WORST ACGM EVER!!!

:P


tears of joy

Seems like this would be a typical reply on this site, right? lol
Victor24 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 8:56 p.m.
#5
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,984
Likes: 1,450
These are all ballpark, no homerism, so you Should be ok.
Fran615 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 9:00 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
These are all ballpark, no homerism, so you Should be ok.


Thank you
Feb. 1 at 9:02 p.m.
#7
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,232
Likes: 9,037
You didn't try to force an Allen to Buffalo trade, and for that I crown you King of the MTL Canadiens fans
Fran615 and Victor24 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 9:04 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: Shibbal18
You didn't try to force an Allen to Buffalo trade, and for that I crown you King of the MTL Canadiens fans


Damn, I juuuuuuuuuust finished watching "The Legend of Taro Tsujimoto Buffalo Sabres Draft Pick 1974" (on youtube). It's such an awesome story.

And as for Allen, I do think he's still got some good veteran play in him.
With a more experienced defense in front of him, he could render good services as a back up to a team whow wants to be ready.

Thank you for the crown haha, but I am just glad that it stays relaxed and chill. Just talking hockey smile
Shibbal18 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 9:06 p.m.
#9
Habs 2010
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 968
All pretty good, I think Monahan might get a touch more after seeing the Lindholm trade, like I think a 1st gets it done but whatever team throws in a sweetener like a depth prospect or late pick is gonna be the one to get him.

I'd be happy if Pearson got us anything, but I'm not too impressed with him so I'd be surprised if there was a taker, even at 50% retained. You never know though I guess.

Value seems right for Allen, but as others already mentioned I don't think his contract is a fit there. I think Philly might make more sense.

I believe that's low on Barron, say what you will about prospect rankings but Pronman had Barron ranked right in the mix with prospects like Barlow, Lucius, and Lambert from the Jets. A good comparable would be Nils Lundqvist who was traded for a 1st + 4th last offseason, Barron should hold the value of a 1st round pick, he is 15th for total points in his draft class as a defenseman.

Edit: Honestly, selling these assets would probably be the perfect trade deadline. Couldn't really ask for more. I would consider trying to sell Savard over Barron but I'm not sure what the market would be.
Fran615 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 9:09 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: Shanesaw9
All pretty good, I think Monahan might get a touch more after seeing the Lindholm trade, like I think a 1st gets it done but whatever team throws in a sweetener like a depth prospect or late pick is gonna be the one to get him.

I'd be happy if Pearson got us anything, but I'm not too impressed with him so I'd be surprised if there was a taker, even at 50% retained. You never know though I guess.

Value seems right for Allen, but as others already mentioned I don't think his contract is a fit there. I think Philly might make more sense.

I believe that's low on Barron, say what you will about prospect rankings but Pronman had Barron ranked right in the mix with prospects like Barlow, Lucius, and Lambert from the Jets. A good comparable would be Nils Lundqvist who was traded for a 1st + 4th last offseason, Barron should hold the value of a 1st round pick, he is 15th for total points in his draft class as a defenseman.


Very solid points you make there. You may be right on all these.
One thing I know for sure: it's that I DON'T know the exact value-and-market for those players.

Thanks for your input!
Shanesaw9 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 9:30 p.m.
#11
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,455
Likes: 2,169
Why is everyone trying to trade Barron? Until Mailloux prove something in the nhl, Barron is our only top 4 lock option.
Feb. 1 at 9:32 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Why is everyone trying to trade Barron? Until Mailloux prove something in the nhl, Barron is our only top 4 lock option.


Well, it's just me hehe.
I have a feeling he's not part of the Habs future plans.
But that's just a proposition; and it won't happen
GuyGuyGuy liked this.
Feb. 1 at 10:08 p.m.
#13
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 1,142
I’d be ok with that Barron trade in the off season once we know what’s going on with Dylan and Dillon.
Fran615 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 10:12 p.m.
#14
CapEvasionEnthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 781
Likes: 458
We'd need to ship more salary out to fit Pearson in, since Sergachev/Cernak are scheduled to come back post ASG break and off IR. Right side defense needs more help than the forward group.

Don't hate it, but I don't think TB would be too interested too. Reasonable offer though I suppose
Fran615 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 10:28 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 18
Likes: 5
All really well balanced thoughts. I think those are the main three subtractions and Hughes always surprises with at least one move and I'm sort of leaning towards your thought on Barron eventually being an odd man out. Would like to see some creativity from Kent there if he goes that route.
Fran615 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 10:29 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 3,255
Only thing I disagree with here is trading Barron, at all. Other than that sure seems good. The other team I've read could be interested in an Allen trade would be COL, only as a stable vet back-up to Georgiev since he's been shouldering basically the whole load of the season so far. George/Allen tandem with Francouz not an option.
ricochetii, KentMcNally and Fran615 liked this.
Feb. 1 at 10:37 p.m.
#17
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,091
If we're going to trade every puck moving defense prospect that suffers from a lack of consistency in 100 games, we will never develop our own Matheson or Petry type and forever be reliant on cast-offs and players past their best before date.
Patience with Barron.
KentMcNally and Fran615 liked this.
Feb. 2 at 9:37 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: Brolekb2b
We'd need to ship more salary out to fit Pearson in, since Sergachev/Cernak are scheduled to come back post ASG break and off IR. Right side defense needs more help than the forward group.

Don't hate it, but I don't think TB would be too interested too. Reasonable offer though I suppose


As far as retained salary, that's the most a team can retain - 50%.
I presume the Habs could take in a 1-year cap dump to balance out the books and make it work.

There's the Barron trade for RHD.
But since it's always a bit risky to trade a young defenseman with high ceiling and former 1st round pick (think Habs with Sergachev haha), I imagine the Habs would want to send it far away, in the other conference, to lessen the fan blowback if he were to start bllossoming right away.

Thanks for your insight
Brolekb2b liked this.
Feb. 2 at 9:38 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: Vanilla_Thunder_14
All really well balanced thoughts. I think those are the main three subtractions and Hughes always surprises with at least one move and I'm sort of leaning towards your thought on Barron eventually being an odd man out. Would like to see some creativity from Kent there if he goes that route.


Yeah, same here. Maybe package Barron with another B+ prospect at another position and get another 1st round pick somewhere.
Unlikely, but creative.

Thanks for your input
Feb. 2 at 9:41 a.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Only thing I disagree with here is trading Barron, at all. Other than that sure seems good. The other team I've read could be interested in an Allen trade would be COL, only as a stable vet back-up to Georgiev since he's been shouldering basically the whole load of the season so far. George/Allen tandem with Francouz not an option.


Yeah, for the right price, Allen becomes a solid backup for a contending team. Some will argue that the second year on his term is a burden, and that's fair. Not sure Habs want to retain for 2 years though.

And I am not shocked at all about the mixed reviews on the Barron trade. Like you said, trading Barron plain and simple, is a divisive move. Not everyone is on board. Some see him as a core piece of the future D, some see him as transient. I tend to fall on the latter part, but that's purely based on the games I've watched. I'd say I watch about 25% of the games, and his defensive lapses have stood out for me. Maybe those games were not a proper measuring stick for him.

Thank you for your input!
Just_A_Guess liked this.
Feb. 2 at 9:45 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: ricochetii
If we're going to trade every puck moving defense prospect that suffers from a lack of consistency in 100 games, we will never develop our own Matheson or Petry type and forever be reliant on cast-offs and players past their best before date.
Patience with Barron.


Great point there.
Glad I'm not the GM hehe.

There are so many factors in evaluating progress curve as well, some that we can't really see.
Even 'off ice' stuff - look at Carter Hart now.....
Are they surrounded by toxic family -- Galchenyuk, 3rd overall.
Do they have the perfect support system -- Suzuki, 13th overall.

Thanks for your input, and yes, patience is key.

(The Barron trade proposal I wrote there is by far the one I'd be the most surprised happening)
Feb. 2 at 9:48 a.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 499
Quoting: jgimp69
I’d be ok with that Barron trade in the off season once we know what’s going on with Dylan and Dillon.


Whatever you say, I'd give you a cheer for your profile pick !

It seems that the Barron trade is the one I proposed that is raising some eyebrows the most.
Habs are doing everyone a huge service by not hiring me as GM, and will most likely preach a bit more patience with him.

But yeah, if it was me, I'd do those trades.

Some may argue he's still worth a late 1st.

Thank you for your input!
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll