SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Avs 2C

Created by: dmh1
Team: 2023-24 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 14, 2024
Published: Feb. 14, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Avs solve biggest need in a badly needed 2C.

Isles giving up Nelson is tough, but they're in a weird spot with an aging roster and a barren prospect pool. Trade gives them a bit of a reset without totally gutting the NHL roster.

- Behrens is a high upside D prospect.

- Meyers can immediately be plugged into NHL roster. Would wager he looks much better in New York.

- Johansen is in trade for cap reasons, but has a better chance of returning to form with New York's style of play rather than Colorado's emphasis on skating.

Could swap Meyers out for Olausson, but I doubt he's viewed as highly. Malinski could also be in the mix, but would imagine the Isles would want a younger forward in return rather than 2 defensemen.
Trades
NYI
  1. Behrens, Sean [Reserve List]
  2. Johansen, Ryan
  3. Meyers, Ben
  4. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
  5. 2025 3rd round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2026
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$83,075,000$637,500$0$425,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,850,000$3,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$987,500$987,500
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 14 at 7:12 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 514
Likes: 328
Don’t see Lou selling personally but Nelson would certainly net quite the haul for them
Feb. 14 at 7:13 p.m.
#2
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,689
Avs are going to have a big problem vis a vis the cap next season
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 14 at 7:23 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,908
Likes: 14,586
Nelson would be an excellent target.
Feb. 14 at 7:29 p.m.
#4
Islanders Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 2,761
RyJo is negative value, Isles could get more/a better deal IMO
Nightowl26 and Altar7358 liked this.
Feb. 14 at 7:33 p.m.
#5
Nightowl26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 461
I believe Nelson gets a better package. Johansen is a negative value, Behrens is an undersized D-man (no interest in him), Meyers is a 25 yr old AHL player, The picks are fine.

Just need a better package of players
Icelander24 and HockeyManiac95 liked this.
Feb. 14 at 7:39 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 514
Likes: 328
Quoting: joshelkin
RyJo is negative value, Isles could get more/a better deal IMO


I’d agree with you there. I think a 1st 2nd and a prospect probably a little better than behrens just for Nelson and another pick to take on RyJo. I think islanders would want a forward rather than D as well
Nightowl26 and Icelander24 liked this.
Feb. 14 at 8:13 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: Altar7358
I’d agree with you there. I think a 1st 2nd and a prospect probably a little better than behrens just for Nelson and another pick to take on RyJo. I think islanders would want a forward rather than D as well


A first, second, and a prospect isn't a bad deal for a 2C
Feb. 14 at 8:15 p.m.
#8
Islanders Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 2,761
Quoting: seanrushton
A first, second, and a prospect isn't a bad deal for a 2C


Nelson is better than Elias Lindholm and has another year of term
Feb. 14 at 8:17 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 11
Quoting: Nightowl26
I believe Nelson gets a better package. Johansen is a negative value, Behrens is an undersized D-man (no interest in him), Meyers is a 25 yr old AHL player, The picks are fine.

Just need a better package of players


Think you’re underselling Meyers a bit here. He’s been much better in the NHL than his production would suggest, suffering mostly from low shooting percentages and real unlucky bounces. Has had chances. I think he specifically makes a ton of sense for the Isles if they sell. Could easily be a young replacement for Martin or Clutterbuck.
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 14 at 8:20 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: joshelkin
Nelson is better than Elias Lindholm and has another year of term


I think that the Horvat package is a lot easier of a comparison than Lindholm considering the Isles were involved in the Horvat trade and there isn't a cap dump included... A first, a second, a prospect, and maybe a midround pick isn't a bad deal for either side
HockeyManiac95 liked this.
Feb. 14 at 8:23 p.m.
#11
Nightowl26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 461
Quoting: seanrushton
I think that the Horvat package is a lot easier of a comparison than Lindholm... A first, a second, a prospect, and maybe a midround pick isn't a bad deal for either side


I disagree. Every year the FA market is set by a trade. Last year, it was the Horvat trade. This year, the market for a 2C is Lindholm's trade. Also remember Lindholm is a UFA at the end of the year. Nelson has 1 more remaining year at a reasonable 6M for a 2C who scores 30 goals.
Feb. 14 at 8:23 p.m.
#12
Islanders Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 2,761
Quoting: seanrushton
I think that the Horvat package is a lot easier of a comparison than Lindholm... A first, a second, a prospect, and maybe a midround pick isn't a bad deal for either side


Beauvillier ended up being a flop but at least he was a younger forward with a track record of 18-20 goal seasons under his belt. I wouldn’t classify him as a cap dump. I also think Raty is a better prospect than anyone coming back to NYI in this hypothetical deal

For example, if Boston wanted Nelson (no brainer for them IMO) that package starts with a 1st and Lysell. Maybe the Isles take back an expiring contract like Forbort to make the cap work, but I’d prefer that trade over this one
Feb. 14 at 8:24 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: Nightowl26
I disagree. Every year the FA market is set by a trade. Last year, it was the Horvat trade. This year, the market for a 2C is Lindholm's trade. Also remember Lindholm is a UFA at the end of the year. Nelson has 1 more remaining year at a reasonable 6M for a 2C who scores 30 goals.


I mean the inclusion of a cap dump makes the value a little murkier... The Sean Monahan trade could also be used as a baseline
Feb. 14 at 8:24 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 24
Likes: 11
Quoting: joshelkin
Nelson is better than Elias Lindholm and has another year of term


Ehhh… not sure about that. Remember the Canucks also had to pay extra to get him from Calgary.
Feb. 14 at 8:26 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: joshelkin
Beauvillier ended up being a flop but at least he was a younger forward with a track record of 18-20 goal seasons under his belt. I wouldn’t classify him as a cap dump. I also think Raty is a better prospect than anyone coming back to NYI in this hypothetical deal

For example, if Boston wanted Nelson (no brainer for them IMO) that package starts with a 1st and Lysell. Maybe the Isles take back an expiring contract like Forbort to make the cap work, but I’d prefer that trade over this one


I agree that a prospect better than Raty would be coming back but I think the combination of a better prospect plus the extra 2nd and an extra mid-round pick more than makes up for the difference between the two
Feb. 14 at 8:27 p.m.
#16
Islanders Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 2,761
Quoting: dmh1
Ehhh… not sure about that. Remember the Canucks also had to pay extra to get him from Calgary.


What VAN paid still sets the market, and again Nelson has another full season of term at a very reasonable cap hit. He 100% returns a better package than Lindholm IMO
Feb. 14 at 8:28 p.m.
#17
Islanders Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 2,761
Quoting: seanrushton
I agree that a prospect better than Raty would be coming back but I think the combination of a better prospect plus the extra 2nd and an extra mid-round pick more than makes up for the difference between the two


Not when you’re taking back Ryan Johansen’s contract for 2 years
Feb. 14 at 8:29 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: joshelkin
Not when you’re taking back Ryan Johansen’s contract for 2 years


No... just as a base trade... Nelson for a 1st, 2nd, decent prospect, and maybe an extra mid-round pick seems more than fair... paying you to take on Johansen’s contract would probably require a second or more
joshelkin liked this.
Feb. 14 at 8:30 p.m.
#19
Nightowl26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 461
Quoting: dmh1
Ehhh… not sure about that. Remember the Canucks also had to pay extra to get him from Calgary.


Show me where the Canucks had to pay more? You don't think at the deadline, there are a bunch of teams looking for a solid 2 way 2 line center who scores 30 goals. If that's the case, Isles will have plenty of suitors calling.
Feb. 14 at 8:31 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: Nightowl26
Show me where the Canucks had to pay more? You don't think at the deadline, there are a bunch of teams looking for a solid 2 way 2 line center who scores 30 goals. If that's the case, Isles will have plenty of suitors calling.


I think he's talking about the division tax when he means that he has to pay more
Nightowl26, dmh1 and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 14 at 8:31 p.m.
#21
Nightowl26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 461
Quoting: seanrushton
I mean the inclusion of a cap dump makes the value a little murkier... The Sean Monahan trade could also be used as a baseline


what cap dump?
Feb. 14 at 8:31 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 1,237
Quoting: Nightowl26
what cap dump?


Kuzmenko was a cap dump if I remember correctly
dmh1, HockeyManiac95 and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 14 at 8:33 p.m.
#23
Islanders Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 2,761
Quoting: seanrushton
No... just as a base trade... Nelson for a 1st, 2nd, decent prospect, and maybe an extra mid-round pick seems more than fair... paying you to take on Johansen’s contract would probably require a second or more


That I agree with. Thought we were taking Johansen too. But I’d just prefer a 1st and higher end prospect

Still don’t think Nelson is traded at all though
seanrushton liked this.
Feb. 14 at 8:35 p.m.
#24
Nightowl26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 461
Quoting: seanrushton
Kuzmenko


how is a 28 yr old winger who scored 39 goals last year and this year fell out of favor with Tocchet this year. Under Bruce Boudreau he was incredible a cap dump
Feb. 14 at 8:35 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 411
Quoting: joshelkin
Not when you’re taking back Ryan Johansen’s contract for 2 years


You would only take ryjo for one year and then post deadline if he went.
TJTwolf liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll