SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Alter the DNA

Created by: JDHockey
Team: 2024-25 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 9, 2024
Published: Mar. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Most will say that Carlo is untouchable, however, he is your best chip to land a true 1C this summer. I think we could see major change like this in the result of another short playoff. The reason for the bridge year was to see what you had in the cupboard and plan for the future. This lineup is a result of both. Philly fans will want to ride with Ersson, but I think grooming him behind a true #1 would be wise for a franchise that has been begging for decent goaltending. Montour, to me, is an intriguing option; I think Zito let’s both Montour and Reinhart walk. Mixed feelings on Bertuzzi, however, the chemistry with Zacha and Pastrnak is there (should Monty need to juggle up the lines like we know he does). I’m sure this will get a TON of negative feedback but fans would tune in every night to watch this roster.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$7,000,000
2$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,000,000
2$900,000
1$950,000
5$6,250,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Barkey, Denver
  2. 2024 1st round pick (FLA)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (PHI)
2.
BOS
  1. Barzal, Mathew
  2. 2024 4th round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. Carlo, Brandon
  2. Lysell, Fabian
  3. 2024 1st round pick (FLA)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,700,000$87,140,834$50,000$330,000$559,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$9,150,000$9,150,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 2
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
RW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD
RFA - 1
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 12 at 1:51 p.m.
#1
Caps fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 337
Likes: 124
NYI aren't really in a position to sell their best player for futures with basically every player on their team with a long term contract being 30+
JDHockey liked this.
Mar. 12 at 1:53 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
JDHockey
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 55
Likes: 8
Quoting: BackstromIsTheGoat
NYI aren't really in a position to sell their best player for futures with basically every player on their team with a long term contract being 30+


I would agree. But I think this makes Pulock (higher cap than Carlo) expendable for forward help, and the possibility to flip the picks if need be.
Mar. 12 at 1:55 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2024
Posts: 11
Likes: 3
I like this concept, although I dont know if NYI will move barzy as they are remaining competitive. I also think ullmark may stop a trade to philly if he stopped one to LA
JDHockey liked this.
Mar. 12 at 1:59 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
JDHockey
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 55
Likes: 8
Quoting: NB92
I like this concept, although I dont know if NYI will move barzy as they are remaining competitive. I also think ullmark may stop a trade to philly if he stopped one to LA


Very true on both points. I love a team that values hugs over business lol. Help me.
NB92 liked this.
Mar. 12 at 2:09 p.m.
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
I just couldn't hate this concept any more, and not because of my username. Carlo should be available in the right move.

Is this it though? I don't think it's close. You're moving the teams best non NHL prospect, two firsts (for a team that hasn't been drafting in the first round much) and Carlo for a guy that frankly just isn't a fit? god no. Barzal has averaged 73 points per 82 games over his career, and I don't like his two way game. Honestly, I think he really should be a winger. Overpaid, bad culture fit, heck of a player, but don't change the DNA for that.

ultimately, why would you change the DNA of this team. they're in a transition year and are second in the league. it's just a bad concept.
JDHockey liked this.
Mar. 12 at 2:14 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 168
Likes: 79
Quoting: JDHockey
I would agree. But I think this makes Pulock (higher cap than Carlo) expendable for forward help, and the possibility to flip the picks if need be.


The Isles will never trade barzal, and especially to the Bruins. I don't get this logic of trading Barzal, to then trade Pulock for another forward who would just have to fill Barzal's spot. The Isles aren't entertaining any trades for Barzal, Horvat, Dobson, or Sorokin
JDHockey and ordinarymutant liked this.
Mar. 12 at 2:18 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
JDHockey
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 55
Likes: 8
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I just couldn't hate this concept any more, and not because of my username. Carlo should be available in the right move.

Is this it though? I don't think it's close. You're moving the teams best non NHL prospect, two firsts (for a team that hasn't been drafting in the first round much) and Carlo for a guy that frankly just isn't a fit? god no. Barzal has averaged 73 points per 82 games over his career, and I don't like his two way game. Honestly, I think he really should be a winger. Overpaid, bad culture fit, heck of a player, but don't change the DNA for that.

ultimately, why would you change the DNA of this team. they're in a transition year and are second in the league. it's just a bad concept.


Organizations and coaches utilize players differently than others. I think Barzal could be the dynamic 1C we need. If not you run Bertuzzi-Zacha-Pastrnak and Marchand-Poitras-Barzal. If there is another 1C option that fits better for them then definitely. I still believe this is the package it would take.

In regards to your last comment, points are fun during the season. Sign me up for wildcard placement and deep runs every year. It blows my mind the amount of Bruins fans who are content with regular season success and then use it for their agenda. In a copycat league, is anyone copying the Bruins system ?
Mar. 12 at 2:29 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 1,187
Sure, having Ersson play behind a 1# probably won't hurt him, but paying a 1st, 3rd and Barkey in a rebuild for Ullmark who won't be there long-term and probably will skedaddle after his contract is done is a terrible move for Philly.
Mar. 12 at 3:01 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 729
Isn’t barzel better on the wing
FoxYou727 liked this.
Mar. 12 at 3:01 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 669
Likes: 235
flyers decline, not moving that much for a goalie they don't need
Mar. 12 at 3:08 p.m.
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: JDHockey
Organizations and coaches utilize players differently than others. I think Barzal could be the dynamic 1C we need. If not you run Bertuzzi-Zacha-Pastrnak and Marchand-Poitras-Barzal. If there is another 1C option that fits better for them then definitely. I still believe this is the package it would take.

In regards to your last comment, points are fun during the season. Sign me up for wildcard placement and deep runs every year. It blows my mind the amount of Bruins fans who are content with regular season success and then use it for their agenda. In a copycat league, is anyone copying the Bruins system ?


well that's just the thing - you want a playoff style player and your target is barzal? I just don't see it. to me he's a perimeter player. dependent on the powerplay etc. I think what you want is what they already have. both zacha and coyle play a big style, and both get to the net.

The point is, and I think you recognize this, Barzal isn't an ideal fit. Stylistically, he doesn't fit the mold. Am I for any team going outside of the box a little here and there to get someone that can help? absolutely. but if you're making a franchise altering trade of a core member of the team, the teams top prospect, and two firsts - that player better be a perfect fit. If you're going to offer that, go get JEE.
JDHockey liked this.
Mar. 12 at 3:11 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
JDHockey
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 55
Likes: 8
Quoting: Bcarlo25
well that's just the thing - you want a playoff style player and your target is barzal? I just don't see it. to me he's a perimeter player. dependent on the powerplay etc. I think what you want is what they already have. both zacha and coyle play a big style, and both get to the net.

The point is, and I think you recognize this, Barzal isn't an ideal fit. Stylistically, he doesn't fit the mold. Am I for any team going outside of the box a little here and there to get someone that can help? absolutely. but if you're making a franchise altering trade of a core member of the team, the teams top prospect, and two firsts - that player better be a perfect fit. If you're going to offer that, go get JEE.


That’s fair. I respect a lot of your posts on here too. Sorry if my previous post was a little forward. In the end this is most likely moot because the FO value Carlos analytics and intangibles.
Mar. 12 at 3:19 p.m.
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: JDHockey
That’s fair. I respect a lot of your posts on here too. Sorry if my previous post was a little forward. In the end this is most likely moot because the FO value Carlos analytics and intangibles.


likewise, and i certainly didn't mean to be confrontational. I get after so many years of having the centers figured out, it's tough not having that top end guy. I feel like the culture and structure of this team is so strong, that major moves shouldn't be made that shakes up the core, but that's just me!
JDHockey liked this.
Mar. 12 at 4:08 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 313
Likes: 118
Easy decline for Flyers.
JDHockey liked this.
Mar. 12 at 7:48 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 932
Likes: 534
value isn't the worst, but islanders aren't selling their best player

Philly is in a rebuild/retool so they aren't the team for Ullmark
JDHockey liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll