SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuilding from the D up

Created by: RecycleShark
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 23, 2024
Published: Mar. 24, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Adds solid veteran D UFA's. Sharks young D prospects will have to earn their icetime and break into the league more slowly. Thrun and Emberson may have been rushed this year. Roy brought in for present and future. Dillon and Martinez brought in for the short term to fix the defense and mentor prospects.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
3$900,000
3$800,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
2$900,000
2$1,100,000
2$1,100,000
1$2,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$6,000,000
3$5,500,000
2$5,250,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
3$3,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Levshunov, Artyom
3$950,000
Havelid, Hugo
3$900,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (MTL)
Additional Details:
Anderson = $5.5M x3 = $16.5m
Vlasic = $7M x 2 = $14M
Difference = $2.5M
Draft pick is for the difference
2.
SJS
  1. Schmidt, Nate
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
Pick is for cap relief
3.
SJS
  1. 2025 5th round pick (SJS)
4.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
26$83,500,000$82,281,667$0$1,250,000$1,218,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Levshunov, Artyom
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 24 at 10:32 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Canadiens don't do that, and neither do the Sharks. Not sure Vlasic would agree to it either. Brendan Dillon at $5.5m seems like a massive overpay, and no chance Pavelski comes back to a Sharks team that is almost certainly going to be in the bottom 5 again next year.
Mar. 24 at 10:34 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,150
Likes: 3,638
The signings of Dillon and Martinez long term make no sense. It clogs up the lineup even more and blocks capable young players who need time. Grier also said that they aren’t handing out contracts like that to players over 30. I’m fine with taking on Schmidt and Anderson for assets
Mar. 24 at 10:45 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,672
Habs easily decline.

Habs hace the lineup spots to have a coupke overpaid D. They dont for a bad dman
Mar. 24 at 10:56 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
RecycleShark
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 934
Likes: 261
Quoting: glarson17
The signings of Dillon and Martinez long term make no sense. It clogs up the lineup even more and blocks capable young players who need time. Grier also said that they aren’t handing out contracts like that to players over 30. I’m fine with taking on Schmidt and Anderson for assets


I didn't think 3 years for Dillon and 2 for Martinez were too long considering we probably have at least 3 years of rebuilding left. I assumed Grier was talking about giving contacts of 5 to 8 years to players over 30.
Mar. 24 at 11:12 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,150
Likes: 3,638
Quoting: RecycleShark
I didn't think 3 years for Dillon and 2 for Martinez were too long considering we probably have at least 3 years of rebuilding left. I assumed Grier was talking about giving contacts of 5 to 8 years to players over 30.


It’s long for their age and it blocks Thrun and Mukhamadullin from getting into the lineup. I’d be fine adding on the right side and waiving like Burroughs
RecycleShark liked this.
Mar. 24 at 11:18 p.m.
#6
Zamboni driver
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 124
Likes: 20
Vlasic wouldn't crack top six in Montreal probably a 7...no thanks
Mar. 24 at 11:21 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,889
Likes: 3,248
No reason for MTL to consider that.
Mar. 25 at 12:12 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,758
Likes: 7,004
It makes more sense for Winnipeg to just buy out Schmidt if necessary.
Mar. 25 at 4:05 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 449
Likes: 141
I'd accept that from the Habs' perspective.
Mar. 25 at 6:04 a.m.
#10
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2021
Posts: 6,960
Likes: 3,040
Gorton & Hughes seem to have a policy against sending established NHL veterans to the AHL. They did it briefly with Armia as a wake-up call, but then brought him back.

Burying a player like Vlasic, which is the only sensible thing for the Habs to do, would send the wrong message to veterans around the league about the dangers of signing in Montreal.

I think the Habs are gonna ride out Anderson & Gallagher contracts as the most expensive, albeit still productive, 4th line in hockey.

Edit: Sorry I should also mention that while they could do the same with Vlasic, all the Habs organizational depth is at D, and so it's harder to use one of 6 "in-demand" spots over one of 12 "hard to fill" spots on a bad contract.
Mar. 25 at 10:11 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,334
Likes: 1,855
Nashville isnt speeding up the waiver exemption status by trading for wesiblatt. We already have a ton of RW in that 21-23 year old range that we have to deal with (Evangelista, Tomasino, Afanasyev) then a couple younger ones right behind them (L'Heureux, Kemell, schaeffer). He also hasnt really done anything at the AHL level to date so seems like a waste of assets
Mar. 25 at 10:31 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1,004
Anderson has a lesser cap hit and is much younger, Montreal has room on their roster for him, and Montreal legitimately does not have a spot on their D core for Vlasic. Its a very easy pass for Montreal.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll