SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gabe Comes Back

Created by: DrFart_PhD_MD_Esq
Team: 2024-25 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 25, 2024
Published: Mar. 25, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$6,000,000
3$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$2,750,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
Trades
1.
COL
  1. Perbix, Jack [Reserve List]
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (BOS)
2.
COL
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
I have no idea if Anaheim or anyone accepts Ross in a draft day trade. I just think the Avs will need to dump his cap or Josh Mansons cap if Gabe comes back. Would love to resign walker but likely not realistic.
ANA
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (BOS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the SEA
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2026
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$87,500,000$86,920,000$0$80,000$580,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$12,600,000$12,600,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,125,000$6,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LW
UFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$898,750$898,750 (Performance Bonus$22,500$22K)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$896,250$896,250 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,250,000$7,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$850,000$850,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$800,000$800,000
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 25 at 11:42 a.m.
#1
Representing the 505
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 3,682
I like Trenin but I'm not buying him as a 3C. I also think, given his age, Mitts is either going long or just doing a 3-4 year bridge to get to UFA before he hits 30. Also would prefer they trade Manson to keep Walker but that may not be possible.
Mar. 25 at 11:45 a.m.
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 6,656
Why is Anaheim giving up a 2nd for a guy who we could have signed if we wanted to?
GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 25 at 11:46 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,410
Likes: 11,795
Can’t see Verbeek wanting to trade a 2nd for another center
Jded liked this.
Mar. 25 at 11:58 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Why is Anaheim giving up a 2nd for a guy who we could have signed if we wanted to?


How was Anaheim able to sign an rfa "if they wanted to"?
Xqb15a, Anus_McLeod, JeffW and 1 other person liked this.
Mar. 25 at 12:01 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Can’t see Verbeek wanting to trade a 2nd for another center


Replace Rico while the young guns grow? Seem to be lacking proven nhl centers. Might not be the right guy for you but I see a need at center unless you're full sending next season towards a high pick.
Mar. 25 at 12:13 p.m.
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 6,656
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
How was Anaheim able to sign an rfa "if they wanted to"?


Saw 27 and first year of contract, thought he was a UFA signing.

Either way, last thing Anaheim needs is another center.
Mar. 25 at 12:14 p.m.
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 6,656
Edited Mar. 25 at 5:16 p.m.
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
Replace Rico while the young guns grow? Seem to be lacking proven nhl centers. Might not be the right guy for you but I see a need at center unless you're full sending next season towards a high pick.


McTavish, Lundestrom, and Strome are all proven NHL centers, and we can go hunting in UFA if we specifically want a short term guy while the kids come in.
GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 25 at 12:44 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,659
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
Replace Rico while the young guns grow? Seem to be lacking proven nhl centers. Might not be the right guy for you but I see a need at center unless you're full sending next season towards a high pick.


Ducks have Carlsson, McTavish, Zegras, Strome, Lundestrom, Grouxl, Gauthier who could all very reasonably play center for ANA next year. What do you mean?
GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 25 at 2:07 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: Jded
Ducks have Carlsson, McTavish, Zegras, Strome, Lundestrom, Grouxl, Gauthier who could all very reasonably play center for ANA next year. What do you mean?


This is center depth that will win a draft loto, not a playoff birth. Strome has been good but also plays the wing, I am high on McTavish but, he isn't a full time center either. Zegras is a wing. Leo learning at 1 or 2c isnt a bad idea but that doubles back to what the Ducks plan to do. How many more seasons until you try for playoffs? I am not saying Colton is the right guy, but this isnt an nhl center depth that gives anyone concern. You've acquired some really really good prospect, would figure its about time to bring in established talent and make a run at the weak Pacific.
Mar. 25 at 3:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,659
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
This is center depth that will win a draft loto, not a playoff birth. Strome has been good but also plays the wing, I am high on McTavish but, he isn't a full time center either. Zegras is a wing. Leo learning at 1 or 2c isnt a bad idea but that doubles back to what the Ducks plan to do. How many more seasons until you try for playoffs? I am not saying Colton is the right guy, but this isnt an nhl center depth that gives anyone concern. You've acquired some really really good prospect, would figure its about time to bring in established talent and make a run at the weak Pacific.


I’m sorry but I don’t think you’ve been watching ANA games (which frankly, is a very good thing for you).

Leo has only been learning exclusively as a 1 or 2C and has looked totally solid for this being his D+1 year. He will remain in that role for ANA long-term

McTavish is undoubtedly a 2C for ANA right now. He’s almost producing .7pt/g and >52% faceoffs as a 21 year old. He’s locked in with Leo as 1/2Cs now and long/term.

That leaves 3C with Zegras (who has 2 60+ point campaigns exclusively as a center), Strome who is center capable but I agree better for the wing, Lundestrom and Grouxl who are probably more 4Cs, and Gauthier who will more likely play LW but could totally get looks at C.

I love the idea of being a contender, but I’m less convinced that the time to sell futures for a run at the division is right after back/to-back campaigns as a bottom 3 NHL team. We have a lot of issues to fix and development of our youth to be had. I actually agree that Colton would be a solid 3C, but I’m not sure it makes sense to lock up $4Mx3 at what is one of Anaheim’s least concerning positions long-term, and where our young guys need to be playing to develop. It’s not an absurd proposal though tbh, I’d actually like Colton. I just dont agree that the Ducks don’t have centers. We have like 4 <23year old Cs that I expect to be in our top 6 next year alone
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Mar. 25 at 5:18 p.m.
#11
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 6,656
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
This is center depth that will win a draft loto, not a playoff birth. Strome has been good but also plays the wing, I am high on McTavish but, he isn't a full time center either. Zegras is a wing. Leo learning at 1 or 2c isnt a bad idea but that doubles back to what the Ducks plan to do. How many more seasons until you try for playoffs? I am not saying Colton is the right guy, but this isnt an nhl center depth that gives anyone concern. You've acquired some really really good prospect, would figure its about time to bring in established talent and make a run at the weak Pacific.


Leo is our 1C, McTavish has been exclusively 2C all year. If we feel the need for a 3C, again, there is free agency, especially if we want someone short term.
Mar. 25 at 5:32 p.m.
#12
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,891
Likes: 3,128
Can NJD get in on that ross colton offer?
Mar. 25 at 6:14 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,624
Likes: 1,659
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Leo is our 1C, McTavish has been exclusively 2C all year. If we feel the need for a 3C, again, there is free agency, especially if we want someone short term.


I’ll be honest, the more I think about this the more I’m into it. Zegras doesn’t make sense as a 3C. Even if he works on his defensive game, he’ll always be offense first and not someone who should start their shifts in the dzone. Gauthier is likely a LW for us and also deserving of a better ceiling than 3C behind Leo and McT. That leaves Gaucher who disappointed this year and looks like he needs at least a year if not more, and may end up topping out on the 4th line. A Vatrano - Colton - Killorn 3rd line could start like 60% of their shifts in the dzone and play solid defense but also still contribute some pretty solid production
Mar. 26 at 10:05 a.m.
#14
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 6,656
Quoting: Jded
I’ll be honest, the more I think about this the more I’m into it. Zegras doesn’t make sense as a 3C. Even if he works on his defensive game, he’ll always be offense first and not someone who should start their shifts in the dzone. Gauthier is likely a LW for us and also deserving of a better ceiling than 3C behind Leo and McT. That leaves Gaucher who disappointed this year and looks like he needs at least a year if not more, and may end up topping out on the 4th line. A Vatrano - Colton - Killorn 3rd line could start like 60% of their shifts in the dzone and play solid defense but also still contribute some pretty solid production


If we going to bring in an upgrade at 3C, then we should send cheaper roster players the other way.

A big reason Colorado would look to do this is for cap relief, and they are still in compete mode. Lundestrom or Groulx and a long shot NHLer like Helleson makes more sense I think.
Jded liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll