SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Necas

Created by: LauzonJessy
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 2, 2024
Published: Apr. 2, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
7$7,850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$7,000,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
CAR
    Necas in Montreal this summer
    2.
    MTL
    SJS
    1. Dvorak, Christian
    2. 2025 3rd round pick (VAN)
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2024
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the WSH
    2025
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the NJD
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    2026
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    24$83,500,000$81,797,083$1,022,500$3,977,500$1,702,917
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    RW, LW
    UFA
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $7,875,000$7,875,000
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
    RW, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $7,850,000$7,850,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,362,500$3,362,500
    C, RW
    RFA - 2
    $7,850,000$7,850,000
    RW
    RFA
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $835,000$835,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $2,900,000$2,900,000
    C, LW
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,100,000$1,100,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $812,500$812,500
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $4,875,000$4,875,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,150,000$3,150,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $950,000$950,000
    LD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $890,000$890,000
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LD/RD
    RFA
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $875,000$875,000
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Apr. 2 at 2:09 a.m.
    #1
    On the Rod Meal Plan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2023
    Posts: 532
    Likes: 319
    Ah yes, and I will manifest Matthews, Makar, McDavid, and Mackinnon on the Canes!
    NucksnOilers liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 2:23 a.m.
    #2
    Save Mcdavid
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 2,908
    Likes: 1,257
    So Carolina just gives Necas to the Habs for free?? No draft pick compensation??

    Habs would give up their first rounder (most likely top 8), their second rounder and a 3rd for Necas. Carolina probably allows him to walk for that if Im being honest
    Chuck54 liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 8:41 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: NucksnOilers
    So Carolina just gives Necas to the Habs for free?? No draft pick compensation??

    Habs would give up their first rounder (most likely top 8), their second rounder and a 3rd for Necas. Carolina probably allows him to walk for that if Im being honest


    Canes wouldn't take draft pick compensation. Canes are in the middle of a cup window, they'd need a replacement top six scorer, be that Caufield, Suzuki, or Slafkovsky
    Apr. 2 at 8:45 a.m.
    #4
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,457
    Likes: 3,411
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Canes wouldn't take draft pick compensation. Canes are in the middle of a cup window, they'd need a replacement top six scorer, be that Caufield, Suzuki, or Slafkovsky


    Caufield for Necas and Nikishin only way that happens

    Suzuki or Slaf only happens if Aho is coming the other way or a package that includes Nikishin, 1st and one of your top six players, Svech ideally, Jarvis or Necas would do though
    Apr. 2 at 8:55 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: Subbanator7667
    Caufield for Necas and Nikishin only way that happens

    Suzuki or Slaf only happens if Aho is coming the other way or a package that includes Nikishin, 1st and one of your top six players, Svech ideally, Jarvis or Necas would do though


    Brother, put the bong down. Necas is more valuable than Slafkovsky AND Caufield. Suzuki, fair, he'd need to be added to. But this is like me saying you'd need to add Hutson to Slafkovsky for Necas...
    Apr. 2 at 8:55 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2023
    Posts: 99
    Likes: 37
    Both sides are being delusional here..... All that to say you know there is no way these two teams are interested in doing any kind of business with the other.
    Apr. 2 at 9:01 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2023
    Posts: 1,337
    Likes: 611
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Brother, put the bong down. Necas is more valuable than Slafkovsky AND Caufield. Suzuki, fair, he'd need to be added to. But this is like me saying you'd need to add Hutson to Slafkovsky for Necas...


    Bong hell those are some serious hallucinogens if he thinks that way. No pot ever has made someone that delusional.
    Caniac2000 and ht42 liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 9:05 a.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: Justafan79
    Bong hell those are some serious hallucinogens if he thinks that way. No pot ever has made someone that delusional.


    I was trying to be nice because I get infractions like they're candy on Halloween, but it's... oh it's bad.
    Justafan79 liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 9:30 a.m.
    #9
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,457
    Likes: 3,411
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Brother, put the bong down. Necas is more valuable than Slafkovsky AND Caufield. Suzuki, fair, he'd need to be added to. But this is like me saying you'd need to add Hutson to Slafkovsky for Necas...


    Hahahaha Habs management would severely disagree and likely laugh at you when stating that opinion.

    You don't like the reality that Necas wouldn't get any of those three players in his own but it is the truth in the world we live in. And right now, when is comes to Slaf and Suzuki, there's literally not a single player on Carolina other than Aho that Habs management would give you either 1 for 1 in a trade
    Apr. 2 at 9:36 a.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: Subbanator7667
    Hahahaha Habs management would severely disagree and likely laugh at you when stating that opinion.

    You don't like the reality that Necas wouldn't get any of those three players in his own but it is the truth in the world we live in. And right now, when is comes to Slaf and Suzuki, there's literally not a single player on Carolina other than Aho that Habs management would give you either 1 for 1 in a trade


    Are you high? Jarvis, Necas and Svechnikov would all require Slafkovsky +, and that is UNDENIABLE. Necas would require Caufield +. There's a reason the Habs suck and the Canes are a cup contender, you expect the Canes to have significantly better players than the Habs, they do! Necas, Jarvis have a better P/60 than both Caufield and Slafkovsky, and Svechnikov is scoring at a better pace than Caufield AND is putting up a comparable points pace to Suzuki while being younger! You're on drugs buddy.
    Justafan79 liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 9:40 a.m.
    #11
    Bunch of Jerks
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2016
    Posts: 378
    Likes: 138
    Quoting: Cushmaker
    Both sides are being delusional here..... All that to say you know there is no way these two teams are interested in doing any kind of business with the other.


    Thank you - even if you removed the Aho - KK offersheet history, Carolina would only want to move Necas for a roster upgrade, and Montreal isn't looking to move any of the players that Carolina would consider in that move. These two teams just aren't a good match for this kind of deal.
    Apr. 2 at 12:20 p.m.
    #12
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,457
    Likes: 3,411
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Are you high? Jarvis, Necas and Svechnikov would all require Slafkovsky +, and that is UNDENIABLE. Necas would require Caufield +. There's a reason the Habs suck and the Canes are a cup contender, you expect the Canes to have significantly better players than the Habs, they do! Necas, Jarvis have a better P/60 than both Caufield and Slafkovsky, and Svechnikov is scoring at a better pace than Caufield AND is putting up a comparable points pace to Suzuki while being younger! You're on drugs buddy.


    Buddy, all those players for any of CC, Slaf or Suzuki move the Habs backwards. It's not that hard to use logic and realize that's Habs management wouldn't want to take on any player older than the on their giving up.

    It's why our teams don't make good trade partners, you have 24-28 year old players in a win now mode, Habs have all 24 and under players rebuilding. It's basic logic that you some how can't grasp.

    Slaf or Suzuki would require Aho for Habs management to dlsay yes

    Carolina wouldn't take on Slaf because he's to young and isn't useful for another two years

    Both statements are true, you're bias is comparing players who are older to younger players and thinking about potential or future because your team is in win now.

    Always fun to see you get riled up though lol
    Apr. 2 at 12:33 p.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: Subbanator7667
    Buddy, all those players for any of CC, Slaf or Suzuki move the Habs backwards. It's not that hard to use logic and realize that's Habs management wouldn't want to take on any player older than the on their giving up.

    It's why our teams don't make good trade partners, you have 24-28 year old players in a win now mode, Habs have all 24 and under players rebuilding. It's basic logic that you some how can't grasp.

    Slaf or Suzuki would require Aho for Habs management to dlsay yes

    Carolina wouldn't take on Slaf because he's to young and isn't useful for another two years

    Both statements are true, you're bias is comparing players who are older to younger players and thinking about potential or future because your team is in win now.

    Always fun to see you get riled up though lol


    LMAO, you think I'm riled up because of your delusional takes. That's funny. Habs management would jump at Slafkovsky for Jarvis. They'd jump at Slafkovsky for Svechnikov. Montreal do not have the assets for Aho, at all. You just do not LMAO.
    Justafan79 liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 12:34 p.m.
    #14
    Save Mcdavid
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 2,908
    Likes: 1,257
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Canes wouldn't take draft pick compensation. Canes are in the middle of a cup window, they'd need a replacement top six scorer, be that Caufield, Suzuki, or Slafkovsky


    I agree but I think it depends if they really like any prospects in the top 1-8, they could also free up cap to re-sgin a majority of their d-core + Guentzel + add another top 6 player through trade
    Apr. 2 at 12:39 p.m.
    #15
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: NucksnOilers
    I agree but I think it depends if they really like any prospects in the top 1-8, they could also free up cap to re-sgin a majority of their d-core + Guentzel + add another top 6 player through trade


    Canes don't like drafting D men in round one, which means this draft is probably not one they look to trade into the top 10.
    Apr. 2 at 12:44 p.m.
    #16
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,457
    Likes: 3,411
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    LMAO, you think I'm riled up because of your delusional takes. That's funny. Habs management would jump at Slafkovsky for Jarvis. They'd jump at Slafkovsky for Svechnikov. Montreal do not have the assets for Aho, at all. You just do not LMAO.


    Hahaha ya every team would jump at the chance to give up the guy who's 4+ years younger than everyone you listed and is already looking like one of the best power forwards in the league.

    Use logic for once, take off the cane coloured glasses and ask yourself, do you give up the 20 year old who looks like Rantanen for any of those players? No
    Apr. 2 at 12:46 p.m.
    #17
    Save Mcdavid
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 2,908
    Likes: 1,257
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Canes don't like drafting D men in round one, which means this draft is probably not one they look to trade into the top 10.


    Doesn't need to be a d-man, I can't remember the last time the Canes had a true sniper in the top 6 (maybe Jeff Skinner or Svech but I think he's more of an all around player). If Eiserman is available with the Habs pick they might bite
    Apr. 2 at 12:48 p.m.
    #18
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: NucksnOilers
    Doesn't need to be a d-man, I can't remember the last time the Canes had a true sniper in the top 6 (maybe Jeff Skinner or Svech but I think he's more of an all around player). If Eiserman is available with the Habs pick they might bite


    Guentzel, Svechnikov... Eiserman won't be there at 6
    Apr. 2 at 12:57 p.m.
    #19
    Save Mcdavid
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 2,908
    Likes: 1,257
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Guentzel, Svechnikov... Eiserman won't be there at 6


    Guentzel 100% is not a sniper, he is far more of just an offensive powerhouse that can maybe give you 30 goals but that's more so just due to his talent. Is Svech one either? He certainly has the skill set to be one but he has only hit 30 goals once in his career, wouldn't be shocked if he randomly drops 50 next year when healthy.

    Regardless, I think the Canes should at least consider the compensation considering it allows them to re-sign key pieces and add a potentially better player than Necas.
    Apr. 2 at 1:00 p.m.
    #20
    I Love J Boqvist
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2023
    Posts: 12,074
    Likes: 3,207
    Quoting: Subbanator7667
    Hahaha ya every team would jump at the chance to give up the guy who's 4+ years younger than everyone you listed and is already looking like one of the best power forwards in the league.

    Use logic for once, take off the cane coloured glasses and ask yourself, do you give up the 20 year old who looks like Rantanen for any of those players? No


    Slaf>Suzuki>Necas>Caufield in terms of value imo
    Subbanator7667 liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 1:03 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 19,568
    Likes: 5,047
    Quoting: NucksnOilers
    Guentzel 100% is not a sniper, he is far more of just an offensive powerhouse that can maybe give you 30 goals but that's more so just due to his talent. Is Svech one either? He certainly has the skill set to be one but he has only hit 30 goals once in his career, wouldn't be shocked if he randomly drops 50 next year when healthy.

    Regardless, I think the Canes should at least consider the compensation considering it allows them to re-sign key pieces and add a potentially better player than Necas.


    Guentzel got multiple 40+ goal seasons... he's a sniper. Svechnikov has 4 different 30 goal pace seasons. I'm not exactly concerned with him not being the sniper he was expected to be when he was drafted
    Apr. 2 at 1:38 p.m.
    #22
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,457
    Likes: 3,411
    Quoting: dgibb10
    Slaf>Suzuki>Necas>Caufield in terms of value imo


    It's honestly more to mess with this guy. One of the most bias people on the site who doesn't use logic or facts to back up his arguments. Rather discussions and arguments with people like you who use stats and useful info for your argument
    dgibb10 liked this.
    Apr. 2 at 2:30 p.m.
    #23
    Save Mcdavid
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 2,908
    Likes: 1,257
    Quoting: Caniac2000
    Guentzel got multiple 40+ goal seasons... he's a sniper. Svechnikov has 4 different 30 goal pace seasons. I'm not exactly concerned with him not being the sniper he was expected to be when he was drafted


    Them grabbing a sniper doesn't even matter imo. They grab a top 8 prospect on an elc and gain cap to re-sign a top-6 or top-4 piece. This feels like a good deal imo over keeping Necas for a price that may not even be worth it
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll